Skip to content
Bramble

UK

GB News presenter and commentator apologise, will pay Green deputy leader damages

GB News presenter Alex Armstrong and commentator Bernadette Spofforth apologised at the High Court and agreed to pay "substantial damages" to Green deputy leader Mothin Ali over posts wrongly suggesting he took part in the 2024 Harehills riot.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Evening Standard
Image: Arab News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2GB News presenter Alex Armstrong and social media commentator Bernadette Spofforth have apologised and agreed to pay "substantial damages" to Mothin Ali, deputy leader of the Green Party of England and Wales. Mixed · 2Ali sued the pair for defamation over posts on X that accused him of taking part in the 2024 Harehills riots in Leeds. Mixed · 2The High Court in London heard on Friday that Ali, a Leeds City Council councillor, had attended the disturbances in July 2024 to assist police and emergency services and appeal for calm.

Mixed · 2Samantha Thompson, representing Armstrong and Spofforth, told the court that they apologised to Ali for the serious harm to his reputation and for his distress. Centre · 1Ali has been deputy leader of the Green Party of England and Wales since 2025. Right · 1Arab News also reported that Ali said he received death threats on social media after the claims circulated, and that West Yorkshire Police confirmed they had received reports of threatening messages and were making enquiries.

Right · 1Arab News separately described a related row over claims that Ali attended a rally in support of the Iranian government: Conservative MP Alec Shelbrooke said in the Commons he was "appalled", and Sir Keir Starmer, described as former prime minister, said "we're all shocked", while Ali said he had attended a Stop the War protest, was "proudly anti-war and anti-racist", and that attending did not mean he supported the Iranian regime. Right · 1Ali has demanded apologies from Starmer and Shelbrooke over those comments; the report does not say they have given them.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Short court report centred on the apology and damages, describing the posts as wrongly suggesting Ali took part in a riot.
Emphasis
The apology, the damages and Ali's role helping police.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the death threats, police inquiry or the separate Iran rally row covered by Arab News.
For example
“after wrongly suggesting he participated in a riot” — Evening Standard

Right1 outlet

Framing
Frames the settlement as a response to "false" claims, then widens to threats against Ali and the separate row over his alleged support for Iran.
Emphasis
Death threats, the police inquiry, and Starmer and Shelbrooke's Commons remarks with Ali's rebuttal.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not note that the Harehills claims and the Iran claims are separate matters beyond saying 'separately'.
Charged language
“false riot claims”“anti-police Harehills riots”
For example
“over false riot claims” — Arab News
“Separately, West Yorkshire Police are investigating threatening messages” — Arab News

Ask about this story

Loading…