Golden Globes owners sue Golden Globe Foundation as HFPA fraud suit continues
The Penske-controlled Golden Globes has sued the Golden Globe Foundation over use of the name, two months after the HFPA sued Penske Media alleging fraud and monopolisation over the 2023 sale of the awards show.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Golden Globes LLC, the Penske Media-controlled owner of the awards show, filed a federal lawsuit in California on 30 September against the Golden Globe Foundation (GGF), alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. The Hollywood ReporterLC “the complaint filed on Sept. 30 in California federal court” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “the Penske-controlled Golden Globes is going after the Golden Globe Foundation for trademark infringement and unfair competition” Read at Deadline ↗ Mixed · 2The suit seeks an injunction barring the nonprofit from using the Golden Globe name, plus unspecified damages; Deadline describes it as a four-claim complaint filed by Sidley Austin attorneys and says the owners want a jury. The Hollywood ReporterLC “It seeks a court order that, if granted, would bar the nonprofit from continuing to do so, plus unspecified damages.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “the Golden Globes’ four-claim complaint details” Read at Deadline ↗ Mixed · 2The complaint says the GGF was created to let the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) continue charitable work after the show was sold, but that its use of the name has grown to include events, auctions, grants, publications and merchandise without authorisation. The Hollywood ReporterLC “The lawsuit claims the group’s use of the name has expanded beyond nonprofit work to include selling merchandise, hosting events featuring the brand” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “including hosting events, conducting auctions, awarding grants, publishing materials, and developing merchandise” Read at Deadline ↗
Mixed · 2It says a cease and desist was sent in 2025 and that licence negotiations broke down after Raffi Boghosian became president of the GGF board; Eldridge says Boghosian directed the firing of former CEO Gregory Goeckner and the lawyer handling the talks. Deadline dates the end of talks to July 2026. The Hollywood ReporterLC “Negotiations for a license broke down after the nonprofit elected Raffi Boghosian as the president of its board of directors earlier this year” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “cut off licensing negotiations in July 2026 when Boghosian took over the GGF” Read at Deadline ↗ Mixed · 2The owners also allege the GGF is coordinating with the HFPA: they say the two are settling the HFPA's claims against the GGF, with charitable funds going to the HFPA, and that naming the GGF as a defendant was a pretext to enable this. Deadline notes the filing makes these assertions "on information and belief". The Hollywood ReporterLC “The HFPA’s inclusion of GGF as a defendant was a pretext designed to facilitate this transfer” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “On information and belief, GGF and the HFPA have since entered into or are in the process of finalizing a settlement” Read at Deadline ↗ Mixed · 2The suit follows the HFPA's own lawsuit against Penske Media, filed about two months earlier, which accuses Penske Media and Eldridge of fraudulently acquiring the show as part of a plan to monopolise the awards market; the HFPA also accuses Penske of using its control of the Hollywood trade press to instigate a boycott that left the group vulnerable to takeover. The Hollywood ReporterLC “the HFPA alleging Penske Media and Eldridge fraudulently acquired the show as part of a larger plan to monopolize the awards market”“The HFPA has accused Penske Media of leveraging its control over the Hollywood trades to instigate a boycott of the group” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “Two months after the remnants of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association sued Penske Media Corporation” Read at Deadline ↗
Centre · 1GGF spokesperson Nate Miller called the suit "a transparent attempt to pressure the Foundation" and said the group will answer it in court. Miller said the GGF was created as part of the same deal that sold the show, that the Globes' president attended its first grants dinner, where it gave $5 million to 96 organisations, and that the company had previously promoted the Foundation's name. DeadlineN “This lawsuit is a transparent attempt to pressure the Foundation, and we will answer it in court.”“where we gave $5 million to 96 organizations” Read at Deadline ↗ Mixed · 2The Hollywood Reporter said the HFPA, Eldridge and Penske Media did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Both outlets disclose ties to Penske Media: The Hollywood Reporter says it shares ownership with Dick Clark Productions, and Deadline says Penske Media is the parent of its owner. The Hollywood ReporterLC “The HFPA, Eldrige and PMC didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ DeadlineN “PMC is the parent company of Deadline owners PMX” Read at Deadline ↗ Centre · 1The 2027 Golden Globes submission deadline is 30 October, and the ceremony, hosted by Nikki Glaser, airs on CBS and Paramount+ on 10 January 2027. DeadlineN “the submission deadline for the 2027 Golden Globes is October 30 this year” Read at Deadline ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Frames the suit as the latest escalation in a "messy" ownership fight, tying it to the HFPA's fraud and monopoly claims.
- Emphasis
- The owners' allegations of GGF-HFPA coordination and the HFPA's boycott accusation against Penske Media.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Includes no GGF response; mentions shared ownership with Dick Clark Productions but not Penske Media's tie to The Hollywood Reporter.
- Charged language
- “Messy”“New Salvo”“embattled association”
- For example
-
“the latest escalation in a legal battle over ownership of the awards show” — The Hollywood Reporter
“the Golden Globes’ messy divorce from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association” — The Hollywood Reporter
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Light, wry tone treating the dispute as a courtroom skirmish over a confusingly similar name and money, with a disclosure of Penske Media's tie to Deadline.
- Emphasis
- The complaint's trademark claims, Boghosian's role, and the GGF's rebuttal; awards-season dates.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives little detail on the HFPA's boycott accusation.
- Charged language
- “Shindig Skirmish”“legal loggerheads”“trophy cabinet of unspecified damages”
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Golden Globes LLC sued the Golden Globe Foundation on 30 September in federal court over use of the Golden Globe name.
- The suit seeks an injunction and unspecified damages.
- The HFPA has separately sued Penske Media over the sale of the Golden Globes.
- The complaint alleges coordination between the GGF and the HFPA and a settlement that would move charitable funds to the HFPA.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the GGF's use of the name is unauthorised and in bad faith
- Left
- Reports the owners' complaint that the use has expanded into commercial work and is part of coordination with the HFPA, without a GGF response.
- Centre
- Reports the same allegations, then carries the GGF's reply that the owners promoted the Foundation's name and that the suit is a transparent attempt at pressure.
-
Whether the HFPA-GGF settlement is real and a pretext
- Left
- Presents the pretext and fund-transfer claims as the complaint's allegations.
- Centre
- Notes they are made on information and belief and gives the GGF's rejection of the owners' characterisation.
Penske Media organisation
Through the Penske-controlled Golden Globes, says the GGF is using the name without authorisation, has expanded into commercial activity and acts in alignment with the HFPA. It had not commented to The Hollywood Reporter.
“without authorization from Plaintiff and over Plaintiff’s express demand that Defendant cease such use” — Deadline
“The HFPA, Eldrige and PMC didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.” — The Hollywood Reporter
Hollywood Foreign Press Association organisation
Alleges in its own suit that Penske Media and Eldridge fraudulently acquired the show and used trade-press control to provoke a boycott. It did not comment on the new suit.
“The HFPA has accused Penske Media of leveraging its control over the Hollywood trades to instigate a boycott of the group” — The Hollywood Reporter
Eldridge Industries organisation
Co-plaintiff-side party that says it sent the cease and desist and that Boghosian's actions signalled intent to keep using the mark; accused with Penske of fraud in the HFPA suit.
“Eldridge says Boghosian directed the termination of former CEO Gregory Goeckner” — The Hollywood Reporter
Left1 article
-
Messy Golden Globes Legal Battle Heats Up With New Salvo
Neutral Straight business-news account of the new suit as an escalation of the wider ownership fight, relaying the owners' complaint without GGF comment.

Centre1 article
-
Mixed Wry, colourful retelling of the complaint with the GGF's rebuttal and a disclosure of Penske Media's link to Deadline.

Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 13 Oct 19:34 First The Hollywood ReporterLC Messy Golden Globes Legal Battle Heats Up With New Salvo
- 14 Oct 00:39 +5h 6m DeadlineN Golden Globes Vs Golden Globe: Infringement & Money Are Latest Legal Battlefields In Shindig Skirmish
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…