Skip to content
Bramble

Climate

Greenland fishers and conservationists clash over culling Greenland sharks

Avannaata municipality approved then dropped a plan to cull 1,000 Greenland sharks after fishers reported lost gear. Conservationists warn the slow-breeding species could not withstand a cull.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Fishers and conservationists in Greenland are in dispute over whether to cull Greenland sharks, which tangle in fishing gear and take fish from halibut and cod fishers. Mixed · 2Earlier this year the Avannaata municipality, whose administrative seat is Ilulissat, approved a plan to cull 1,000 sharks, offering 300 Danish krone for each shark heart. Mixed · 2The plan was dropped after the Greenland government questioned its legality, but conservationists fear a cull could return.

Left · 1The municipality's mayor, Lars Erik Gabrielsen, said the aim was to safeguard fishers' income and the catch so that people can keep eating foods they have relied on for generations. Mixed · 2Henrik Jensen, a 27-year-old halibut fisher near Ilulissat, said he has lost about 6,000 hooks this year, sometimes losing 30,000 krone (£3,440) in a day, and that sharks cut his lines. Mixed · 2Timotheus Petersen, chair of the fishing association in Kullorsuaq, said a longline costs 1,599 krone and that when sharks cut lines, fishers cannot finish fishing and must buy new gear.

Left · 1The Guardian reports that Avannaata cited earlier bounty schemes: one in the former Aasiaat municipality in the early 2000s that paid 200 krone, and one in the former Uummannaq municipality from 1986 to 2001 that, according to a 2007 Danish Technical University report, brought in 19,697 hearts. Mixed · 2The Greenland shark can reach six to seven metres and live more than 400 years. It is believed to mature at about 150, and is still recovering from targeted fishing for its liver oil, which ended in the 1960s. Mixed · 2Prof Nick Dulvy of Simon Fraser University called a cull of a couple of thousand sharks "a disaster" and said the species is probably the most biologically sensitive in the ocean to overfishing. An estimated 3,500 are caught as bycatch globally each year, and the population is in decline.

Mixed · 2Oceans North Kalaallit Nunaat (ONKN) argues a cull would not solve the problem because sharks migrate long distances and removed animals would be replaced by others from elsewhere. Mixed · 2ONKN director Jenseeraq Poulsen said the underlying pressures are structural, including too many boats on a pressured quota, rising costs and no alternative employment, in an industry that accounts for about a quarter of Greenland's GDP. Mixed · 2Jensen also pointed to "ghost lines", lost or discarded gear that is too heavy to pull up, as a cause of gear damage, and blamed declining halibut size on offshore trawlers; the Guardian cites the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources as saying average halibut size is falling each year even as prices rise.

Mixed · 2Alternatives include ghost-gear clean-up, a gear-loss compensation scheme and funded trials of acoustic shark deterrents, which ONKN favours. Rebekka Nygård Bak, an adviser to Greenland's fisheries ministry, said bycatch-friendly equipment rules and better bycatch reporting could be next steps.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Guardian's on-the-ground feature presents a nuanced conflict between inshore fishers' losses and a vulnerable species, tracing the pressures behind the dispute to the fishing industry.
Emphasis
Historical bounty schemes, the fishing industry's economic strain, falling halibut size, offshore trawlers, and the mayor's and ministry adviser's views.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report any scientific evidence that sharks are depleting halibut stocks.
Charged language
“acrimonious coexistence”“misunderstood species”
For example
“This acrimonious coexistence has been documented ever since targeted fishing for the sharks’ liver oil ceased in the 1960s” — The Guardian
“conservationists and fishers clash over what to do about misunderstood species” — The Guardian

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
GB News's shorter piece leads on the prospect of a "drastic cull" of the world's slowest sharks, then relays the fishers' and conservationists' arguments in condensed form.
Emphasis
The threat of a cull, fishers' losses, the shark's vulnerability, and conservationists' alternatives.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the mayor's statement, the historical bounty schemes, and the halibut size decline and offshore trawler detail reported by the Guardian; presents the ministry's position more briefly.
Charged language
“drastic cull”“poaching fish”“bully me”
For example
“A shark species could face a drastic cull as fishers and conservationists clash” — GB News
“the sharks bully me and cut my lines” — GB News