Hebrew University study finds eating with a loved one may lower blood sugar spikes
A Science Advances study led by Hebrew University's Shir Atzil found smaller glucose spikes and quicker recovery when people ate a standard carbohydrate meal with a close partner than when they ate alone. Atzil stresses the effect varies widely between people and the work is preliminary.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Sheba Medical Center found that blood glucose after a meal was lower when people ate in the company of someone close than when they ate alone. The Jerusalem PostRC “blood glucose after a meal is lower when eating in companionship, compared with when eating alone” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Fox NewsR “When participants ate together, researchers observed a smaller rise in glucose and a quicker return toward baseline compared with when they ate alone.” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 2Participants ate the same standardized carbohydrate meal in each condition, and those eating in company had smaller glucose spikes and faster glucose recovery. The Jerusalem PostRC “After the same standardized carbohydrate meal, participants had smaller glucose spikes and quicker glucose recovery in the social condition.” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Fox NewsR “Participants in the study were given meals containing the same amount and type of carbohydrates” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1The Jerusalem Post reported that the meal was 50 grams of carbohydrates in 102 grams of white-wheat bread, with glucose sampled over 120 minutes, and that the average change in glucose level was 23%. The Jerusalem PostRC “participants consumed 50 grams of carbohydrates contained in 102 gr. of a standardized white-wheat bread. Their glucose levels after eating were sampled over 120 minutes.”“The average change in the glucose level was 23%.” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗
Right · 2The study was published in Science Advances under the title "Social Physiology: Human homeostasis is more efficient in social proximity"; Fox News said it appeared in late September. The Jerusalem PostRC ““Social Physiology: Human homeostasis is more efficient in social proximity.”” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Fox NewsR “published in the journal Science Advances in late September” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1It was led by Prof. Shir Atzil with PhD student Monia Masalha and Dr. Shai Fuchs of Sheba, and was supported by a European Research Council Starting Grant awarded to Atzil. The Jerusalem PostRC “The research was led by HUJI Prof. Shir Atzil and her PhD student Monia Masalha, with Dr. Shai Fuchs from Sheba.”“supported by a European Research Council Starting Grant awarded to Atzil” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Right · 2The team calls the principle "social physiology": the idea that basic bodily regulation (homeostasis) works more efficiently when a person is near a close partner. The Jerusalem PostRC “the human body regulates itself more efficiently in the presence of social partners” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Fox NewsR “is actually working more efficiently when we're in proximity with a close partner” Read at Fox News ↗
Right · 1According to the Jerusalem Post, the paper also reports that social proximity improved temperature regulation during cold exposure and reduced stress responses in adults and infants, that the benefits appeared without physical touch, and that they were not explained by reduced stress. The Jerusalem PostRC “Social proximity also improved temperature regulation during cold exposure and reduced stress responses in adults and infants.”“The benefits appeared even without physical touch and were not explained by reduced stress.” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Right · 2Atzil said the effect differed greatly between individuals: some gained a large benefit, some a small one, and some regulated themselves better alone, and the reasons are unknown. Fox NewsR “some people actually regulate themselves better when they're alone.” Read at Fox News ↗ The Jerusalem PostRC “there was a huge variation. Some had a big benefit, while others had much less. I can't say now what caused the differences,” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Right · 1She told the Jerusalem Post that the researchers controlled for age, gender, body-mass index, metabolic health, touch and stress, found no difference between men and women, and describe the study as preliminary, with siblings and strangers to be studied next. The Jerusalem PostRC “We controlled for age, gender, body-mass index, metabolic health, how much they touched, stress levels, and more.”“Our next step will be to study siblings and strangers.” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗
Right · 1Atzil suggested the brain, whose main job is keeping the body running, may explain the effect, linking it to how infants learn to regulate their bodies through caregivers; this is her interpretation, not a tested finding. The Jerusalem PostRC “I think it's the brain, whose most important job is to keep the body up and running.” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Right · 1The team has not tested people with diabetes or pre-diabetes, which Atzil called the obvious direction for future research, and the researchers said social closeness is not a substitute for medical care, nutrition or exercise. The Jerusalem PostRC “The team hasn't tested glucose levels of diabetics or those who have pre-diabetes”“social closeness is not a substitute for medical care, nutrition, or exercise” Read at The Jerusalem Post ↗ Right · 1Fox News added outside context from New York-area dietitian Erin Palinski-Wade, who said the amount and type of carbohydrates matter most and that stress, sleep, activity, room temperature and noise also affect blood sugar. Fox NewsR “the amount and type of carbohydrates consumed are particularly important”“all of those things can impact blood sugar” Read at Fox News ↗
Right · 1Fox News also noted that, according to the National Institutes of Health, persistently elevated glucose can contribute to heart, kidney, eye and nerve damage. Fox NewsR “persistently elevated glucose can contribute to serious health problems over time, including heart, kidney, eye and nerve damage, according to the National Institutes of Health” Read at Fox News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present the study as an interesting, mostly positive finding. The Jerusalem Post leads with the study's claims and Atzil's interviews; Fox News frames it as lifestyle news and adds caveats and outside expert comment.
- Emphasis
- The Jerusalem Post stresses the 'social physiology' concept, methods, the 23% average change and the study's wider findings. Fox News stresses individual variation, other factors affecting blood sugar and general glucose-health context.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The Jerusalem Post gives no independent expert comment. Fox News omits the sample details, the 23% figure and the team's additional temperature and stress findings.
- Charged language
- “surprising ways”“powerful and overlooked factor”
- For example
-
“Blood sugar regulation is not just about what we eat, but who we eat with,”” — The Jerusalem Post
“Eating with a close partner may influence the body in a surprising way, new research suggests.” — Fox News
What every side reports
- Hebrew University researchers led by Shir Atzil found smaller glucose rises and faster recovery when people ate a standardized carbohydrate meal with a close partner.
- The study was published in Science Advances.
- Atzil says the effect varies between individuals and more research is needed.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem organisation
Through Prof. Shir Atzil, the university presents the work as showing that human physiology is inherently social, while acknowledging large individual variation and that the study is preliminary.
“Our findings show that human physiology is inherently social.” — The Jerusalem Post
“not everyone benefits the same amount” — Fox News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Eating with someone you love could help your body regulate blood sugar, Israeli study finds
Sympathetic Detailed, enthusiastic account built on interviews with Atzil and the paper, presenting the finding as a new insight into how relationships affect the body.
-
Dining with someone you love may help the body in surprising ways, new research suggests
Mixed Lifestyle piece that reports the finding but cautions about individual differences and adds a dietitian's note that many factors affect blood sugar.

- 3 Oct 06:56 First The Jerusalem PostRC Eating with someone you love could help your body regulate blood sugar, Israeli study finds
- 3 Oct 13:00 +6h 4m Fox NewsR Dining with someone you love may help the body in surprising ways, new research suggests
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.