House Oversight opens probe into DC groups' jury nullification trainings
House Oversight Chairman James Comer asked two DC activist groups, Free DC and Harriet's Wildest Dreams, for documents on their jury nullification trainings. A Reason columnist argues jury nullification is not a crime.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 1On Tuesday 13 October 2026, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee requested documents from two Washington, DC groups, Free DC and Harriet's Wildest Dreams, about their jury nullification trainings, as part of a new investigation. Washington ExaminerR “The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee requested documents from leftist groups on Tuesday about their District of Columbia jury nullification trainings as part of a new investigation.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1Committee chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) wrote in two letters that the groups may be undermining the Constitution's requirement for impartial juries. The Washington Examiner reported that the inquiry came in response to its own story about the trainings. Washington ExaminerR “may be undermining the Constitution’s requirement for impartial juries by advocating subversive tactics against federal prosecutions”“The inquiries came in direct response to a Washington Examiner story” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1Comer alleged that the juror guidance tells activists to falsely present themselves as unbiased and to conceal information that attorneys and judges would use to assess their impartiality. Washington ExaminerR “Comer alleged that the juror guidance tells activists to falsely present themselves as unbiased and conceal information” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1The committee seeks internal communications, advertisements, presentations, recordings, attendee lists, training materials, information about outside advisers and funding records, covering 1 January 2025 to the present, with a 27 October deadline. The requests are not legally binding unless the committee later issues subpoenas. Washington ExaminerR “It requested records covering Jan. 1, 2025, through the present, with an Oct. 27 deadline. The requests are not legally binding unless the committee escalates with subpoenas later.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1The Washington Examiner said neither group responded to its requests for comment. It described Harriet's Wildest Dreams as a prison abolition group founded in 2021 by former Black Lives Matter leaders, and Free DC as a street-protest group that emerged last year in opposition to President Donald Trump's second term. Washington ExaminerR “Free DC and Harriet’s Wildest Dreams did not respond to the Washington Examiner’s requests for comment.”“Harriet’s Wildest Dreams is a prison abolition group founded in 2021 by former Black Lives Matter movement leaders” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1The Examiner quoted Harriet's Wildest Dreams co-founder Qiana Johnson telling attendees at an August training, "You have this superpower, and that superpower is you are able to nullify that godd*** jury." It also quoted Johnson saying she wanted to take 40-50% of the credit for the acquittal of Sean Dunn, charged with assault for allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal officer, because she suspected a juror had joined a training. Washington ExaminerR ““You have this superpower, and that superpower is you are able to nullify that godd*** jury,””““I want to take a little bit of credit, maybe about 40-50% of the credit for the sandwich guy,”” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1The probe also follows a September mistrial in the bribery trial of former DC Councilman Trayon White after a deadlocked jury, which Harriet's Wildest Dreams celebrated on Instagram. Washington ExaminerR “a jury deadlocked in the bribery trial of former D.C. Councilman Trayon White in September, resulting in a mistrial” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1A constitutional law expert previously told the Examiner that attending a jury nullification workshop would not automatically disqualify someone from jury service, but that lying or deliberately withholding relevant information during jury selection could cross a legal line. Washington ExaminerR “attending a jury nullification workshop would not automatically disqualify someone from jury service” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1In a 15 October column, Reason's Damon Root argued that jury nullification is not a crime and that Founders such as James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson supported jurors judging the constitutionality of laws and prosecutions. He cited The Washington Post's report that Comer called the trainings an illegal attempt to subvert federal prosecutors. ReasonRC “many prominent members of America's Founding generation would have agreed with those D.C. activists”“claiming that their instructions given to potential jurors were an illegal attempt to subvert federal prosecutors” Read at Reason ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets are right-leaning. The Washington Examiner reports the probe as an exclusive and adopts the committee's account of the groups as subversive. Reason, in an opinion column, defends jury nullification against Comer's view.
- Emphasis
- The Examiner stresses the groups' left-wing ties, trainer quotes and the document requests. Reason stresses Founding-era history and constitutional argument.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither includes a response from the groups. The Examiner's story gives no defence of the trainings, and Reason does not detail the document requests or the trainer quotes.
- Charged language
- “leftist groups”“subversive tactics”“convicted thief”
- For example
-
“requested documents from leftist groups on Tuesday” — Washington Examiner
“co-founder and convicted thief Qiana Johnson” — Washington Examiner
“I hate to break it to Comer, but many prominent members of America's Founding generation would have agreed with those D.C. activists.” — Reason
What every side reports
- Rep. James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, is investigating Free DC and Harriet's Wildest Dreams over jury nullification trainings.
- Comer said jurors should decide impartially by applying the law as instructed to the facts of the case.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the trainings are improper
- Right
- The Washington Examiner presents the trainings as an effort to subvert prosecutions and quotes Comer saying they undermine the rule of law. Reason's Damon Root argues jury nullification is not a crime and has Founding-era backing.
James Comer person
Comer says the trainings undermine the rule of law and the constitutional guarantee of an impartial jury, and that the groups want jurors to decide on personal beliefs and activist agendas.
“Jury nullification training courses undermine the rule of law, the safety of D.C.’s residents” — Washington Examiner
House Oversight Committee organisation
The committee requested documents from both groups, with an Oct. 27 deadline, and called the reports shocking and a reason for congressional oversight.
“These shocking reports underscore the necessity of congressional oversight” — Washington Examiner
Free DC organisation
Free DC did not respond to the Examiner's request for comment. The Examiner reports that its organizing director, Nee Nee Taylor, also runs Harriet's Wildest Dreams and discussed jury nullification with local media after the White trial.
“Free DC and Harriet’s Wildest Dreams did not respond to the Washington Examiner’s requests for comment.” — Washington Examiner
“Nee Nee Taylor, the executive director of Harriet’s Wildest Dreams and organizing director of Free DC” — Washington Examiner
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
House GOP investigates DC activists training jurors to undermine prosecutions
Critical Exclusive that frames the groups as leftist activists subverting prosecutions, relying on the committee's letters and trainer quotes.

-
ReasonRC · · Opinion
Jury Nullification Is Not a Crime
Critical Opinion column that criticises Comer's probe, arguing jury nullification is lawful and backed by Founding-era figures.

- 13 Oct 14:30 First Washington ExaminerR House GOP investigates DC activists training jurors to undermine prosecutions
- 15 Oct 16:02 +49h 32m ReasonRC Jury Nullification Is Not a Crime Opinion
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…