Council rejects planning bid for 50ft Hucknall rollercoaster; firm vows to challenge
Ashfield District Council has refused a retrospective application for a 50ft test rollercoaster in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, citing its scale. Neighbours welcomed the decision; Mellors Group says it will challenge it.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Ashfield District Council has rejected a retrospective planning application for a 50ft rollercoaster in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, which the Daily Mail and Daily Express say could mean the ride is taken down. Daily MailR “Ashfield District Council has rejected a retrospective planning application which sought to 'formalise the land as a testing and repair depot'.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “the ride could finally be heading for the scrapheap after Ashfield District Council rejected a retrospective planning application” Read at Daily Express ↗ Right · 2The ride is being tested by Nottinghamshire-based Mellors Group, which builds and trials rides for buyers around the world; the Express places it on Sandford Lane. Daily MailR “The attraction is being tested by Nottinghamshire-based Mellors Group, which builds and trials rides for buyers around the world.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “in Sandford Lane, Hucknall, Nottinghamshire” Read at Daily Express ↗ Right · 2In its decision notice, published on October 20, the council said the site would be 'incongruous' and 'intrusive' because of the rollercoaster's 'excessive scale', and that the rollercoasters would create 'an overbearing and oppressive presence when viewed from nearby dwellings'. Daily MailR “Planners ruled the site would be 'incongruous' and 'intrusive' because of the rollercoaster's 'excessive scale'.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “the rollercoasters would create an overbearing and oppressive presence when viewed from nearby dwellings.” Read at Daily Express ↗
Right · 2The authority also raised concerns that the structures would detract from the Grade II-listed RAF and Rolls-Royce hangars on the site. Daily MailR “The authority also raised concerns that the structures would detract from the Grade II-listed RAF and Rolls-Royce hangars on the site.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “detract from the Grade II-listed RAF and Rolls-Royce hangars on the site” Read at Daily Express ↗ Right · 2Residents say they have lived for 18 months in the shadow of the unfinished ride, with test carts running yards from their homes. Locals also say it has attracted urban explorers, and some call it an 'eyesore' and complain of noise from constant testing. Daily MailR “Residents in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, told of spending the last 18 months living in the shadow of the unfinished ride” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “Locals claim the attraction has become a magnet for urban explorers.” Read at Daily Express ↗ Right · 1Resident Jack Welsh, 45, said the carts can be seen from his living room and that loose straps left out overnight make a crashing sound in the wind. Other unnamed neighbours said they were 'thrilled', denied being NIMBYs, and said workmen repairing the ride can see into gardens and bedrooms. Daily MailR “'It is a menace when they leave the straps out overnight. The wind catches them and the straps make a crashing sound, which can be annoying.”“'When the workmen are repairing it they can see right into your gardens and bedrooms which is a bit intrusive.'” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Right · 2Councillor Dave Shaw, who represents Hucknall West, called the decision 'absolutely fantastic news'. Daily MailR “Councillor Dave Shaw, who represents Hucknall West on Ashfield District Council, hailed the decision as 'absolutely fantastic news'.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Daily ExpressR “Councillor Dave Shaw, who represents Hucknall West on Ashfield District Council, hailed the decision as "absolutely fantastic news".” Read at Daily Express ↗ Right · 2Mellors Group said it would challenge the ruling, saying there had been 'a misunderstanding of what we are seeking to achieve' and that it hoped to reach an outcome addressing the concerns. One resident predicted the company would appeal. Daily ExpressR “Mellors Group vowed to challenge the ruling.” Read at Daily Express ↗ Daily MailR “'The company will dig its heels in and appeal but the council were pretty damning in their ruling.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1The Daily Mail also quotes director James Mellors, who said last month that the ride has been there longer than anticipated but is temporary, that it is 'the first one in the world', and that the site is 'a work depot', not a fairground. Daily MailR “'It's the first one in the world, and it's just not quite been going together as well as it should.”“It's not a fairground, it's a work depot.'” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Light, humorous consumer-news pieces siding with neighbours' complaints, using puns ('Taken for a ride', 'driving them loopy') and resident quotes; the refusal of planning permission is presented as the ride being 'torn down'.
- Emphasis
- Resident complaints, the council's strong wording, and the councillor's welcome of the ruling. The Mail adds the firm's earlier explanation.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The Express leaves out James Mellors' earlier comments that the ride is temporary and a work depot. Neither piece explains what an appeal would involve or confirms that demolition has been ordered.
- Charged language
- “Taken for a ride”“driving them loopy”“eyesore”“scrapheap”“That must’ve been doing their heads in”
- For example
-
“Towering 50ft rollercoaster to be torn down over its 'excessive' size after neighbours complained noisy cart testing was driving them loopy” — Daily Mail
“That must’ve been doing their heads in” — Daily Express
What every side reports
- Ashfield District Council rejected a retrospective planning application for the rollercoaster; the decision notice was published on October 20.
- The ride is being tested by Mellors Group and stands about 50ft high.
- The council called the scale 'excessive' and the site 'incongruous' and 'intrusive'.
- Mellors Group said it would challenge the ruling.
- Residents welcomed the decision.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the ride will definitely be torn down
- Right
- Headlines say it is 'to be torn down', while the text says it 'could finally be heading for the scrapheap' and the company says it will challenge the ruling.
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Mixed Playful, pun-led report that favours neighbours' view but includes Mellors Group's response and James Mellors' earlier explanation.

-
Towering 50ft rollercoaster built in UK town to be torn down
Mixed Shorter, jokey rewrite of the same story, with resident and council quotes and a brief company response.

- 27 Oct 12:37 First Daily MailR Taken for a ride: Towering 50ft rollercoaster to be torn down over its 'excessive' size after neighbours complained noisy cart testing was driving them loopy
- 28 Oct 22:04 +33h 26m Daily ExpressR Towering 50ft rollercoaster built in UK town to be torn down
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…