Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Council rejects planning bid for 50ft Hucknall rollercoaster; firm vows to challenge

Ashfield District Council has refused a retrospective application for a 50ft test rollercoaster in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, citing its scale. Neighbours welcomed the decision; Mellors Group says it will challenge it.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Mail
Image: Daily Express

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2Ashfield District Council has rejected a retrospective planning application for a 50ft rollercoaster in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, which the Daily Mail and Daily Express say could mean the ride is taken down. Right · 2The ride is being tested by Nottinghamshire-based Mellors Group, which builds and trials rides for buyers around the world; the Express places it on Sandford Lane. Right · 2In its decision notice, published on October 20, the council said the site would be 'incongruous' and 'intrusive' because of the rollercoaster's 'excessive scale', and that the rollercoasters would create 'an overbearing and oppressive presence when viewed from nearby dwellings'.

Right · 2The authority also raised concerns that the structures would detract from the Grade II-listed RAF and Rolls-Royce hangars on the site. Right · 2Residents say they have lived for 18 months in the shadow of the unfinished ride, with test carts running yards from their homes. Locals also say it has attracted urban explorers, and some call it an 'eyesore' and complain of noise from constant testing. Right · 1Resident Jack Welsh, 45, said the carts can be seen from his living room and that loose straps left out overnight make a crashing sound in the wind. Other unnamed neighbours said they were 'thrilled', denied being NIMBYs, and said workmen repairing the ride can see into gardens and bedrooms.

Right · 2Councillor Dave Shaw, who represents Hucknall West, called the decision 'absolutely fantastic news'. Right · 2Mellors Group said it would challenge the ruling, saying there had been 'a misunderstanding of what we are seeking to achieve' and that it hoped to reach an outcome addressing the concerns. One resident predicted the company would appeal. Right · 1The Daily Mail also quotes director James Mellors, who said last month that the ride has been there longer than anticipated but is temporary, that it is 'the first one in the world', and that the site is 'a work depot', not a fairground.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Light, humorous consumer-news pieces siding with neighbours' complaints, using puns ('Taken for a ride', 'driving them loopy') and resident quotes; the refusal of planning permission is presented as the ride being 'torn down'.
Emphasis
Resident complaints, the council's strong wording, and the councillor's welcome of the ruling. The Mail adds the firm's earlier explanation.
Leaves out or plays down
The Express leaves out James Mellors' earlier comments that the ride is temporary and a work depot. Neither piece explains what an appeal would involve or confirms that demolition has been ordered.
Charged language
“Taken for a ride”“driving them loopy”“eyesore”“scrapheap”“That must’ve been doing their heads in”
For example
“Towering 50ft rollercoaster to be torn down over its 'excessive' size after neighbours complained noisy cart testing was driving them loopy” — Daily Mail
“That must’ve been doing their heads in” — Daily Express

Ask about this story

Loading…