Influencers' ethics complaint against Raman campaign prepared by Bass campaign's law firm
Two influencers filed ethics complaints alleging Nithya Raman's mayoral campaign improperly disclosed payments to influencers. The complaint was prepared by the law firm used by Mayor Karen Bass's campaign, which says it is covering the legal costs.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Influencers Kaitlyn Hennessy and Beatrice Gomberg filed complaints with the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and the Los Angeles Ethics Commission accusing Nithya Raman's mayoral campaign of paying social media influencers without proper disclosure. Los Angeles TimesLC “accusing Nithya Raman's mayoral campaign of paying influencers without proper disclosure” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ New York PostR “have filed complaints with city and state ethics watchdogs” Read at New York Post ↗ The complaint focuses on posts by comedian Adam Conover and by Eric Cheng, an influencer who became a Raman staffer, along with a number of anonymous "meme" accounts. Los Angeles TimesLC “The complaint focused on posts by comedian and TV personality Adam Conover and influencer-turned-Raman staffer Eric Cheng” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ New York PostR “several anonymous meme pages” Read at New York Post ↗ The complaint was prepared with the help of Kaufman Legal Group, the law firm used by Mayor Karen Bass's reelection campaign; the Los Angeles Times first reported this on Thursday after seeing the metadata of a draft of the filings. Los Angeles TimesLC “The metadata for a draft of their filings last week revealed that they had been created with the help of the law firm used by Bass' election campaign.” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ New York PostR “It was prepared by Kaufman Legal Group, the law firm used by Bass’ reelection campaign.” Read at New York Post ↗
The Bass campaign said it is paying for the legal work but not paying Hennessy and Gomberg themselves. Los Angeles TimesLC “Bass' campaign said it is picking up the tab for the legal work but wasn't paying Hennessy and Gomberg for their efforts.” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ The accounts of how the arrangement arose differ: the Times says Hennessy acknowledged the Bass campaign steered them to the firm, while Hennessy told the New York Post they only asked for a referral, learned of the offer to pay their bills 'with the rest of the world', and intend to pay their own legal bills. Los Angeles TimesLC “acknowledged to The Times that the Bass campaign steered them to the Kaufman Legal Group” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ New York PostR ““We have every intent of paying our own legal bills.”” Read at New York Post ↗ Legal experts told the Times the Bass campaign's payment is unlikely to raise ethics issues if it is reported in disclosure filings, which the campaign said it intends to do; Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Marymount law professor, said complaints filed this close to an election warrant extra scrutiny. Los Angeles TimesLC “provided the payments are reported by the campaign in its disclosure reports, which the campaign said it intends to do”“"Whenever I see that there's an ethics complaint filed this close to the election, I always pause for a minute,"” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗
The complaint alleges that Raman's campaign paid Conover's company, SwizzleCorp, while he posted in support of her; the payments were first labelled 'online ads' in campaign finance reports and later amended to 'video production services'. New York PostR “The complaint says Raman’s campaign paid his company, SwizzleCorp, during a period when Conover was posting in support of Raman.” Read at New York Post ↗ Los Angeles TimesLC “They initially were described in Raman's campaign filings as payments for online ads but later were amended to say they were for video production services.” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ Conover denied wrongdoing, said he has never been paid to support Raman, and said a staffer did a few weeks of hourly work for the campaign; he gave the Post invoices for five bills totalling $2,447.13, none mentioning video or social media. He also accused the influencers of secretly working for the Bass campaign. New York PostR “Invoices Conover gave the Post show five bills from March 9 to April 4 totaling $2,447.13”“accused the influencers behind it of “secretly working on behalf of the Bass campaign.”” Read at New York Post ↗ Los Angeles TimesLC “Conover also denied any wrongdoing.” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ The complaint alleges Cheng, who joined the campaign staff in September, kept posting about Raman and was hired in a way that let his posts fall under the staffer exemption; the Raman campaign says he is paid for campaign work, not personal posts, and that it sought guidance from Ethics Commission staff. New York PostR “The complaint alleges Cheng was hired in a way that allowed his posts to fall under that exemption.” Read at New York Post ↗ Los Angeles TimesLC “it had gotten guidance from L.A. Ethics Commission staff on Cheng's disclosure requirements” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗
The complaint also alleges that from about May 14 through at least Sept. 1, anonymous accounts criticised Bass and Spencer Pratt while promoting Raman, with a 'Paid for by Nithya Raman for Mayor 2026' tag but without the wording the city requires, and often not filed with the Ethics Commission within 24 hours. New York PostR “from about May 14 through at least Sept. 1, anonymous accounts bashed Mayor Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt” Read at New York Post ↗ The Raman campaign called the complaint 'frivolous' and said it has been fully transparent and compliant with state and city law. New York PostR “Raman’s campaign called it “a frivolous complaint.”” Read at New York Post ↗ Los Angeles TimesLC “The Raman campaign said it has done nothing wrong” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ Earlier complaints about Conover's posts were filed in May by former council candidate Dylan Kendall, and those investigations are ongoing; the FPPC last month cleared Tom Steyer's gubernatorial campaign of breaking the rules but said several influencers, including Cheng, had not properly disclosed payments from it. Los Angeles TimesLC “The investigations into those complaints, to the FPPC and L.A. Ethics Commission, are ongoing.”“The FPPC last month concluded its investigation into Steyer’s campaign and found that it had properly followed the rules” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗
Violations of Los Angeles rules can bring fines up to $15,000 or three times the amount at issue; new state law lets the FPPC refer alleged violators to law enforcement, with fines up to $5,000 per instance. Hennessy said the pair have also filed complaints against the campaigns of Steyer and Steve Hilton, in Michigan and with the Federal Trade Commission. Los Angeles TimesLC “violations can be penalized with a fine of up to $5,000 per instance” Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ New York PostR “filed one this week against Steve Hilton’s campaign” Read at New York Post ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads on the Bass campaign's behind-the-scenes legal role, framed as a procedural and ethics-of-the-complaint story with expert comment.
- Emphasis
- Metadata discovery, expert views that disclosed legal payments are not inherently improper, caution about late-cycle complaints, and legal background on rules and fines.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not carry Conover's accusation that the influencers work for Bass, nor the invoice detail or Hennessy's dispute of the referral account.
- For example
-
“Their complaints, it turns out, received a legal assist from the campaign of L.A. Mayor Karen Bass.” — Los Angeles Times
“there's nothing inherently wrong for a campaign to have its lawyers file an ethics complaint” — Los Angeles Times
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads on the allegations of secret payments to influencers, with the Bass link as a later development in an 'increasingly bitter' race.
- Emphasis
- Conover's invoices, the Raman campaign's 'frivolous' response, a consultant's 'fake moral superiority' quote, and Hennessy's dispute of the Times's account.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the legal experts' view that covering the costs is unlikely to be an ethics issue, and the earlier Kendall complaints.
- Charged language
- “social media lovefest”“secretly paying”“Fake moral superiority”“influencer industrial complex”
- For example
-
“Nithya Raman’s campaign has been accused of secretly paying social media stars to promote her” — New York Post
“the complaint itself has become part of the increasingly bitter mayoral battle.” — New York Post
What every side reports
- The complaint was prepared by Kaufman Legal Group, the law firm used by Bass's campaign.
- The Bass campaign referred the influencers to the firm and said it would cover legal costs, per the Times.
- Raman's campaign and Conover deny wrongdoing.
- Campaign finance reports first labelled Conover-linked payments 'online ads' and later amended them to 'video production services'.
Where accounts differ
-
How the Bass campaign's legal help arose
- Left
- The Times reports Hennessy acknowledged the Bass campaign steered them to the firm, which the campaign is paying.
- Right
- Hennessy told the Post they only asked for a referral, learned of the payment offer publicly, and intend to pay their own bills.
-
Whether the complaint is independent
- Left
- Legal experts say covering costs is unlikely to be an ethics issue if disclosed; Levinson urges scrutiny of late filings.
- Right
- Conover calls it a political attack and says the influencers secretly work for the Bass campaign; the Raman campaign calls it frivolous.
Nithya Raman person
Her campaign calls the complaint frivolous, says it is transparent and compliant, and that it sought Ethics Commission staff guidance.
““Nithya’s campaign has been fully transparent and in compliance with state and city law,”” — New York Post
Karen Bass person
Her campaign says it is paying for the legal work but not the influencers, and intends to report the expense.
“Bass' campaign said it is picking up the tab for the legal work but wasn't paying Hennessy and Gomberg for their efforts.” — Los Angeles Times
Left1 article
-
Influencers filed ethics complaint against Raman campaign — with help from Bass lawyers
Neutral Explanatory account of the Bass campaign's legal assistance, with expert context on whether it is improper.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Nithya Raman’s social media lovefest under fire over secret payment claims: ‘Fake moral superiority’
Critical Presents the payment allegations against Raman prominently, with strong quotes from critics and Conover's rebuttal.

- 1 Oct 11:00 First Los Angeles TimesLC Influencers filed ethics complaint against Raman campaign — with help from Bass lawyers
- 2 Oct 02:03 +15h 3m New York PostR Nithya Raman’s social media lovefest under fire over secret payment claims: ‘Fake moral superiority’
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.