Skip to content
Bramble

UK

IOPC investigates officer over CCTV review in Farage home firebombing case

The police watchdog is examining whether the Met missed a chance to identify a suspect in the April 2025 attack on Nigel Farage's home, after a second look at CCTV reportedly showed the suspect and their car.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). Rewritten with the latest reporting. Previously: “IOPC examines Met handling of CCTV after Farage home firebombing”.

Image: GB News
Image: Daily Express

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is examining whether the Metropolitan Police "missed an opportunity to protect the public" in its investigation of the April 2025 firebombing attempt at Nigel Farage's home. After the original attack, police told Mr Farage that security cameras had not captured the suspect. The case was reopened during the wider inquiry into the death of Reform UK spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe at her Devon home earlier this year; the Express says there is no suggestion the two incidents are connected.

A further examination of the footage reportedly found the suspect and their car had been captured over an "extended period"; GB News attributes this to The Telegraph. According to the Express, police had taken 74 hours of footage from cameras around the property in the original investigation. The officer who first reviewed the footage is under IOPC investigation over possible discreditable conduct and whether the CCTV work met the required standard.

Counter Terrorism Policing London acknowledged that a line of inquiry was not identified or pursued at the time, and made a mandatory conduct referral to the IOPC. Vicki Evans of counter-terrorism policing said no arrests were made and the original investigation was closed pending new lines of inquiry; she said the force would engage fully with the IOPC. No one has been charged over the attack, and Mr Farage had said at the time that the fire burned itself out in the porch while he was away.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets lead on a police failure: a suspect in the attack on the Reform leader's home was on CCTV but was missed. GB News gives a short, breaking-style report relying on The Telegraph; the Express adds detail and police statements.
Emphasis
The missed CCTV evidence, the IOPC scrutiny of the original officer, and Mr Farage's security concerns.
Leaves out or plays down
GB News gives no police response or detail on the officer. The Express notes there is no suggestion of a link to the Widdecombe case; GB News does not. Neither outlet includes a comment from the Met itself beyond counter-terrorism police.
Charged language
“bludgeoned to death”“firebomb suspect caught on CCTV but police failed to spot him”
For example
“A suspect in a firebombing attack on Nigel Farage's home was caught on CCTV but police failed to spot him.” — GB News
“Nigel Farage's home firebombing investigation has been reopened after a suspect was reportedly caught on CCTV that police initially failed to identify.” — Daily Express