Skip to content
Bramble

World

Israeli embassy denies Netanyahu ordered diplomats to back Argentina on Falklands

The Israeli embassy in London denied a Telegraph report that Prime Minister Netanyahu directed diplomats to back Argentina's Falklands position. The report cited unnamed Israeli sources and a UN speech by envoy Danny Danon.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: JNS
Image: The Jerusalem Post

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 1The Israeli embassy in London on Saturday 24 October denied a British newspaper report that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered Israel's diplomatic corps to back Argentina's position on the Falkland Islands. Right · 1Embassy spokesman Alex Gandler wrote on X: "I categorically deny this allegation. No such directive exists." Right · 1The Telegraph had reported earlier that day that Netanyahu told diplomats to join Argentina in calling for direct talks on the islands' future, and, citing unnamed Israeli government sources, to recognise Argentina's "historical connection" to the territory.

Right · 1According to JNS, the Telegraph linked the alleged move to a decision last month by British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband to impose economic sanctions on Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, and pointed to a UN speech the previous week by Israeli envoy Danny Danon calling for direct negotiations between Britain and Argentina. Right · 1The reported shift comes as Argentine President Javier Milei, described by JNS as a close ally of Netanyahu, has launched a renewed diplomatic push for Buenos Aires's claim to the islands. Right · 1A Jerusalem Post editorial said Danon urged talks at the UN, but stressed that the embassy's denial of any Netanyahu-ordered policy shift "must remain part of the account".

Right · 1The editorial gave qualified support to Israel backing Britain-Argentina negotiations, citing Milei's support during the war after the October 7 massacre and UN General Assembly Resolution 2065 of 1965, which invited both countries to negotiate. Right · 1It also stressed that 99.8% of voters in the 2013 referendum favoured keeping British overseas territory status, and argued Israel should insist that islanders take part in any talks and that sovereignty change needs their consent. Right · 1The Post called on the Israeli government to publish a clear account of its Falklands policy, including whether its position on sovereignty has changed, and said Britain should understand that its choices toward Israel affect the wider relationship.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both Israeli right-leaning outlets lead with or foreground the embassy's denial. JNS reports the denial as news; the Jerusalem Post editorial treats Israel's call for talks as defensible while urging safeguards for islanders.
Emphasis
The embassy's categorical denial, Milei's friendship with Israel, and the need for islanders' consent and a clearer Israeli policy statement.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither outlet includes a Telegraph, British government or Argentine response, or the content of the Telegraph's unnamed sources beyond JNS's summary. JNS does not mention Danon's UN speech beyond the Telegraph's reference to it.
Charged language
“categorically deny”“October 7 massacre”
For example
“"I categorically deny this allegation. No such directive exists," embassy spokesman Alex Gandler wrote on X.” — JNS
“That denial must remain part of the account.” — The Jerusalem Post

Ask about this story

Loading…