Kushner publishes "fact check" rebutting New Yorker article on his business dealings
Jared Kushner, a Trump envoy and Affinity Partners CEO, published a 14-point rebuttal of a September New Yorker article alleging conflicts of interest between his diplomacy and his firm's investments. The New Yorker had not responded in the coverage reviewed.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law and a Middle East negotiator, published a lengthy response on 8 October to a September New Yorker article about his business dealings. Washington ExaminerR “published a lengthy response Thursday to a September article disputing several of its central claims” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ New York PostR “In an Oct. 8 post on his personal website” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1The New York Post describes the response as a 14-point "fact check" of a nearly 5,000-word piece titled "Dollar Diplomacy", which links his diplomatic work to the bottom line of his private equity firm, Affinity Partners. New York PostR “The Affinity Partners CEO’s 14-point fact check begins by addressing allegations”“the nearly 5,000-word article going through the magazine’s “storied fact-checking process.”” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 2Kushner said he had long left such stories unanswered but chose to respond because false claims repeated often enough get believed; he said he wanted people to be able to judge for themselves. New York PostR “when false claims get repeated enough, people start believing them.” Read at New York Post ↗ Washington ExaminerR “allowing claims to go unanswered can cause them to become accepted as fact through repetition” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1He rejected the claim that he was "discreetly raising another five billion dollars" during Iran talks, saying he ended fundraising conversations once he was asked to extend his volunteer role and that Affinity has not raised additional capital while he has volunteered for the government. New York PostR “The instant the actions in Iran began and I was asked to extend my volunteer role, I ended all conversations about additional fundraising”“while I have been volunteering for the government, Affinity has not raised additional capital.” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 2On foreign investment, Kushner said the investments came well before Trump's 2024 run: the Examiner reports he noted that 2021 investments preceded Trump's campaign announcement by two years, and the Post quotes him saying Saudi Arabia's PIF invested after he left government with no plans to return. He also said the New Yorker contradicted itself, since a cited source complained the investments produced returns but no influence over US policy. Washington ExaminerR “noting that the investments came two years before Trump announced his 2024 presidential campaign”“failed to produce influence over U.S. policy” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ New York PostR “PIF’s investment in Affinity was made after I left government” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1Kushner said he has never taken a diplomatic action to benefit Affinity, himself or any investor, that he consulted private ethics counsel and later the White House Counsel's Office on investment moves, and that he receives no government salary and pays his own expenses. New York PostR “I have never taken a diplomatic action to benefit Affinity, myself, or any investor.”“I receive no salary or other compensation from the government for this work and pay my own expenses” Read at New York Post ↗
Right · 1The Post says he also rebutted conflict-of-interest suggestions over a planned Albanian island resort and Affinity's purchase of stock in Israel's Phoenix Financial, and defended his "intentionally unconventional" diplomacy by pointing to the 2020 Abraham Accords and recent efforts including the return of Gaza hostages and a tentative cease-fire. New York PostR “the purchase of an Albanian island to build a luxury resort and his firm’s buying up of stocks in an Israeli financial services company called Phoenix Financial”“intentionally unconventional” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1The Examiner reports Kushner also criticised a similar CNN report from the previous week on his Middle East work and Israeli investments, saying Phoenix is one of Israel's largest publicly traded financial institutions, managing about $220 billion, that Affinity does not choose its underlying investments or own the defense companies CNN highlighted, and that the Phoenix investment was disclosed before Trump's re-election. Washington ExaminerR “Think of Phoenix as the Israeli equivalent of Fidelity or Vanguard”“its investment in Phoenix was publicly disclosed before Trump was reelected” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 2Critics in Congress have raised the same concerns: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) has called Affinity's investments, which the Post says now exceed $6 billion in assets under management, "a glaring and incurable conflict of interest", and Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said the House Oversight Committee was investigating how Trump's family profited from access to power. New York PostR “a glaring and incurable conflict of interest” Read at New York Post ↗ Washington ExaminerR “investigating the unprecedented and dangerous way in which President Trump and his family have profited directly from their access to power” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1The Examiner says Kushner could face a congressional hearing in the coming months if Democrats take power in November, and that the New Yorker did not immediately respond to its request for comment. Neither article reports the New Yorker's reply to the rebuttal. Washington ExaminerR “he could face a congressional hearing in the coming months”“The New Yorker did not immediately respond to a request for comment” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present Kushner's rebuttal as the main story, relaying his points largely in his own words and framing it as his own 'fact check' of the New Yorker.
- Emphasis
- Kushner's denials, his unpaid volunteer role, his investing record and diplomatic achievements; the Examiner adds the CNN rebuttal and possible congressional scrutiny.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither carries a New Yorker response or an independent check of Kushner's 14 points; the New Yorker's own claims are summarised mainly through Kushner's account.
- Charged language
- “My own fact check”“excoriated”“Dollar Diplomacy”
- For example
-
“arguing that the story relies on misleading claims and overlooks documents and other evidence that contradict its conclusions” — Washington Examiner
““People can judge for themselves”” — New York Post
What every side reports
- Kushner published a lengthy response on 8 October disputing a September New Yorker article on his business dealings.
- Kushner says he has never acted diplomatically to benefit his firm and that the foreign investments predated Trump's 2024 campaign.
- Democratic lawmakers including Rep. Jamie Raskin have raised conflict-of-interest concerns.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Kushner's fundraising and investments created a conflict of interest with his diplomatic role
- Right
- Kushner says he ended fundraising talks when his role extended, took no diplomatic action to benefit Affinity and consulted ethics counsel; critics such as Raskin call it an incurable conflict of interest.
Jared Kushner person
Says the New Yorker's claims are false or misleading, that he has never used diplomacy to benefit Affinity, and that people should judge from the documents.
“I have never taken a diplomatic action to benefit Affinity, myself, or any investor.” — New York Post
“People should at least have access to the facts before they come to any conclusions about me” — Washington Examiner
The New Yorker organisation
No response reported; the Examiner says it did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“The New Yorker did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Washington Examiner.” — Washington Examiner
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Kushner pushes back against accusations of improper business dealings: ‘My own fact check’
Neutral Reports Kushner's pushback as a news item, adding the CNN report and Democratic scrutiny, and notes the New Yorker had not responded.
-
Sympathetic Interview-led piece that gives Kushner's rebuttal, motives and record extensively, with little challenge.
- 8 Oct 18:12 First Washington ExaminerR Kushner pushes back against accusations of improper business dealings: ‘My own fact check’
- 9 Oct 00:35 +6h 23m New York PostR Jared Kushner releases lengthy ‘fact check’ against New Yorker story on his ‘dollar diplomacy’ — tells The Post, ‘People can judge for themselves’
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.