Jeremy Strong says he need not apologize for method acting in New Yorker Radio Hour interview
Asked by David Remnick on The New Yorker Radio Hour about his method acting, Jeremy Strong said he doesn't feel he needs to apologize if colleagues find it too intense, calling it "in service of the material".
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2Jeremy Strong said on The New Yorker Radio Hour podcast that he does not feel he needs to apologize to colleagues who think he takes his method acting approach too seriously. VarietyLC “he doesn’t feel the “need to apologize” to those he works with who may feel he is taking the process “too seriously”” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “he doesn’t believe he “need[s] to apologize” for his approach” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Left · 2Host David Remnick, editor-in-chief of The New Yorker, asked how helpful or disruptive his approach is to directors and castmates; The Hollywood Reporter says Remnick cited Strong's Oscar-nominated role in The Apprentice, where he added a scene that was not in the original script. VarietyLC “podcast host and New Yorker editor-in-chief David Remnick” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “Remnick specifically cited his Oscar-nominated turn in The Apprentice, where he added a scene to the film that wasn’t in the original script.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Left · 2Strong replied that he could not really speak to that and that it is never his intention to interfere with anyone else's way of working: "First, do no harm, right? But commit to fucking what you’re doing, and utterly." VarietyLC “First, do no harm, right? But commit to fucking what you’re doing, and utterly.” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “it is never my intention to interfere with anyone else’s experience or anyone else’s way of working” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗
Left · 2Asked whether he gets frustrated with less committed colleagues, he said no, he is "just there to commit utterly to serving the material." VarietyLC “No, just meaning that I’m just there to commit utterly to serving the material.” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “No, just meaning that I’m just there to commit utterly to serving the material.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Left · 2He added that if people feel it "changes the molecules in the room" and makes things uncomfortable, he does not feel he must apologize, because he and the directors he works with believe it is in service of the material, and he thinks many reactions to it are "of a personal nature." VarietyLC “it changes the molecules in the room in a way that makes something uncomfortable” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “I personally think that a lot of the reactions to it are of a personal nature.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Left · 1Strong plays Mark Zuckerberg in Aaron Sorkin's The Social Reckoning, out Oct. 9, which follows whistleblower Frances Haugen and Wall Street Journal reporter Jeff Horwitz; Jeremy Allen White, Mikey Madison, Bill Burr, Betty Gilpin and Billy Magnussen also star. VarietyLC ““The Social Reckoning,” out Oct. 9”“Strong, Jeremy Allen White, Mikey Madison, Bill Burr, Betty Gilpin and Billy Magnussen star in “The Social Reckoning,”” Read at Variety ↗
Left · 2Sorkin told The New York Times that Strong treated co-stars "the way he imagines Mark treats the people around him"; he said he told the other actors Strong would not socialize with them and added, "You cannot argue with the results." The Hollywood ReporterLC “He is going to treat you the way he imagines Mark treats the people around him,’” he added. “And that’s what happened. You cannot argue with the results.”” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ VarietyLC “Sorkin told The New York Times that Strong was treating his co-stars “the way he imagines” Zuckerberg would treat them” Read at Variety ↗ Left · 2Brian Cox, Strong's Succession co-star, has criticized the method approach, reportedly calling it "fucking annoying" and saying in a New Yorker profile that it is "a particularly American disease"; Variety notes he also said Strong "was wonderful to act with." VarietyLC “calling it “fucking annoying,” though he also noted in a later interview that Strong “was wonderful to act with.”” Read at Variety ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “It’s a particularly American disease, I think, this inability to separate yourself off while you’re doing the job.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Left · 1The Hollywood Reporter also recalls that Strong previously said the profile was painful and that remarks by co-stars were sometimes presented out of context, while insisting there is "deep respect and even love" among them. The Hollywood ReporterLC “But foundationally, there’s deep respect and even love.”“It was painful for it to be put out to the world” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both entertainment trade outlets lead with Strong's refusal to apologize and relay his quotes at length, setting them against Sorkin's and Brian Cox's earlier comments.
- Emphasis
- Strong's quotes, the Cox criticism, Sorkin's defence and the upcoming release of The Social Reckoning. Hollywood Reporter adds Strong's earlier reaction to the New Yorker profile.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither includes comment from Remnick or The New Yorker beyond the interview quotes, or from other co-stars on the new film.
- Charged language
- “now infamous”“method acting antics”“particularly American disease”
- For example
-
“Jeremy Strong, now infamous for his dedication to method acting” — Variety
“Strong’s method acting antics have long made headlines.” — Variety
“It’s a particularly American disease, I think” — The Hollywood Reporter
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Strong told David Remnick on The New Yorker Radio Hour that he does not feel he needs to apologize for his method acting.
- Strong said his approach is in service of the material and he thinks many reactions are personal.
- Strong plays Mark Zuckerberg in Aaron Sorkin's The Social Reckoning.
- Brian Cox has publicly criticized Strong's method acting.
Jeremy Strong person
Says he never intends to interfere with others' work but will not apologize, because he and his directors believe his commitment serves the material.
“it’s in service of the material, and I personally think that a lot of the reactions to it are of a personal nature.” — The Hollywood Reporter
“it is never my intention to interfere with anyone else’s experience” — Variety
Left2 articles
-
Mixed Presents Strong's defence as the latest in a long run of method-acting controversies, with Cox's criticism and a promotional note on the new film.

-
Neutral Reports Strong's remarks with extended background from Sorkin, Cox and Strong's earlier comments on the New Yorker profile.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 4 Oct 00:05 First VarietyLC Jeremy Strong Defends Method Acting, Says He Doesn’t Feel the Need to ‘Apologize’ to Co-Stars Who May Think ‘I’m Taking It Too Seriously’
- 4 Oct 01:58 +1h 54m The Hollywood ReporterLC Jeremy Strong Says He Doesn’t “Need to Apologize” for Method Acting: “It’s in Service of the Material”
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.