Judge disqualifies Essayli from two California cases, ruling he is a "de facto" US attorney
Senior US District Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled Bill Essayli is unlawfully serving as a "de facto" US attorney for the Central District of California and disqualified him from overseeing two criminal cases. The order is not immediate, and Essayli says the Supreme Court will decide the question.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Senior US District Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled on Tuesday 27 October that Bill Essayli cannot participate in or supervise the prosecutions in two criminal cases, finding he is unlawfully serving as a "de facto" US attorney in Southern California. Fox NewsR “U.S. District Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled Tuesday that Essayli cannot participate in or supervise the prosecutions in the two criminal cases.” Read at Fox News ↗ Raw StoryL “Senior U.S. District Judge J. Michael Seabright disqualified Bill Essayli on Tuesday from serving as first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California” Read at Raw Story ↗ Mixed · 2The disqualification does not take effect immediately, which gives the Justice Department time to seek a stay pending appeal. Fox NewsR “the disqualification will not take effect immediately, giving the Justice Department time to seek a stay pending appeal.” Read at Fox News ↗ Raw StoryL “Finn noted the ruling does not take effect immediately.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Mixed · 2Essayli said in a statement, "We respectfully disagree with the court's order," and that the President and Attorney General "have every right to select supervisors within the Justice Department." He said the question "will be decided by the Supreme Court" and that he looks forward to serving in his current role until then. Raw Story reported that he said the order is automatically stayed while the government seeks a full stay pending appeal. Fox NewsR “ultimately, this question will be decided by the Supreme Court, and I look forward to serving in my current role until then.” Read at Fox News ↗ Raw StoryL “Essayli added that the order is automatically stayed while the government seeks a full stay pending appeal” Read at Raw Story ↗
Right · 1Essayli first served as interim US attorney under an appointment that expired after 120 days. Then-Attorney General Pam Bondi then appointed him a special attorney and designated him first assistant US attorney. He was never formally nominated by the president or confirmed by the Senate. Fox NewsR “Essayli originally served as interim U.S. attorney under an appointment that expired after 120 days.”“He was never formally nominated by the president or confirmed by the U.S. Senate.” Read at Fox News ↗ Mixed · 2Seabright ruled in October 2025 that Essayli was not lawfully acting US attorney but let him keep supervising prosecutions under his other titles. He wrote then that the outcome "appears to be little remedy at all," according to Bloomberg Law as cited by Raw Story. Fox NewsR “Seabright previously found that the arrangement did not lawfully make Essayli acting U.S. attorney but allowed him to continue supervising prosecutions under his other titles.” Read at Fox News ↗ Raw StoryL “appears to be little remedy at all,” Read at Raw Story ↗ Mixed · 2Seabright revisited the issue after the Ninth Circuit ruled over the summer against a similar arrangement for a federal prosecutor in Nevada, Sigal Chattah. Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a revised designation last month to narrow Essayli's authority, but Seabright found it still gave him enough authority to effectively occupy the vacant post, writing, "In sum, Essayli is unlawfully serving as a 'de facto' United States Attorney." Fox NewsR “Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a revised designation last month to narrow Essayli's authority and distinguish his situation from the Nevada case” Read at Fox News ↗ Raw StoryL “The ruling comes after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's order disqualifying Nevada prosecutor Sigal Chattah” Read at Raw Story ↗
Right · 1The ruling came as Essayli helps lead a Justice Department effort over more than 20,000 California registered voters the administration says are likely noncitizens. Judge David O. Carter said he would rule Wednesday on the department's request to have their ballots separated while eligibility is reviewed. Fox NewsR “U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said he would issue a ruling Wednesday on the administration's request.” Read at Fox News ↗ Left · 1Reaction split along political lines. Allies of President Trump criticised the judiciary: RedState's Jennifer Van Laar sarcastically wrote "We don't have activist judges here, no, sir" and urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to scrap the blue slip custom, and Ed Martin said "Impeaching Judges is Necessary at Times." Journalist Marcy Wheeler mocked Essayli, saying he "was playacting." Raw StoryL “"Impeaching Judges is Necessary at Times," he declared.”“Not everyone was upset. National security journalist Marcy Wheeler mocked Essayli” Read at Raw Story ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Raw Story casts Essayli as a "MAGA", "scandal-plagued" prosecutor and focuses on the right's angry reaction to the ruling.
- Emphasis
- Online backlash from Trump allies, the Nevada precedent, and defence lawyers likely to renew challenges to Essayli.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not detail the revised Blanche designation or the 20,000-ballot case in the text available.
- Charged language
- “MAGA erupts”“scandal-plagued”“trying to obstruct California voters”
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Fox News reports the ruling straight, leading with Essayli's statement that the Supreme Court will decide, and ties him to the election-integrity ballot case.
- Emphasis
- Essayli's response, the legal history of his appointment, Blanche's revised designation, and the ballot dispute.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not cover the online reaction to the ruling or defence-lawyer challenges.
- Charged language
- “election integrity”“illegal voting”
- For example
-
“Bill Essayli says the Supreme Court will ultimately decide his fate after a federal judge ruled he is unlawfully serving as a de facto U.S. attorney.” — Fox News
What every side reports
- Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled Tuesday that Essayli is disqualified from overseeing cases.
- The ruling does not take effect immediately.
- Essayli disagrees and says the Supreme Court will decide the question.
- The ruling follows a Ninth Circuit decision against a similar arrangement for a Nevada prosecutor.
Where accounts differ
-
Meaning of the ruling and the reaction
- Left
- Portrays Essayli as a MAGA loyalist obstructing voters and highlights backlash against an 'activist' judge.
- Right
- Presents it as a legal dispute over appointment authority that Essayli says the Supreme Court will settle, alongside an election-integrity effort.
Bill Essayli person
Disagrees with the order, says the President and Attorney General may choose Justice Department supervisors, expects the Supreme Court to decide, and plans to keep serving until then.
“"The President and the Attorney General have every right to select supervisors within the Justice Department,"” — Fox News
Left2 articles
-
Judge disqualifies MAGA prosecutor trying to obstruct California voters
Critical Headline attributes to Essayli an effort to obstruct California voters and labels him MAGA.

-
MAGA erupts after ‘activist’ judge boots Trump’s hand-picked prosecutor
Mixed Reports the ruling and Essayli's reply, then focuses on right-wing outrage, with the 'activist' judge in scare quotes.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Federal judge rules Bill Essayli unlawfully serving as de facto US attorney in California
Neutral Straightforward account of the ruling and appointment history, giving Essayli's election-integrity rationale for the ballot case.

- 28 Oct 01:48 First Raw StoryL Judge disqualifies MAGA prosecutor trying to obstruct California voters
- 28 Oct 01:57 +9m Raw StoryL MAGA erupts after ‘activist’ judge boots Trump’s hand-picked prosecutor
- 28 Oct 05:22 +3h 33m Fox NewsR Federal judge rules Bill Essayli unlawfully serving as de facto US attorney in California
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…