Judge reduces Russell Brand indecent assault charge as prosecution closes case
At Southwark Crown Court, the judge ruled there was insufficient evidence for one indecent assault count against Russell Brand and replaced it with attempted indecent assault. The prosecution is wrapping up its case, and Brand denies all charges.
1 / 4
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2On Tuesday 27 October 2026, at Southwark Crown Court in London, Mr Justice Bennathan told jurors there was "insufficient evidence" for an indecent assault charge against Russell Brand, and the count was replaced with a lesser one of attempted indecent assault. DeadlineN “The judge told jurors there was “insufficient evidence” for the charge and it has instead been reduced to attempted indecent assault.” Read at Deadline ↗ GB NewsR “In respect of count two, I have reached the decision that there is insufficient evidence of indecent assault.” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2Jurors were directed to return a not guilty verdict on the original count, and a juror formally delivered it; the judge called this a "slightly artificial process", and Brand pleaded not guilty to the new count. GB NewsR “a male juror seated at the end of one row was selected to deliver the not guilty verdict on the original indecent assault count.” Read at GB News ↗ DeadlineN “The jury went through the formalities of finding Brand not guilty on the now-replaced charge.” Read at Deadline ↗ Right · 1The judge said his task at the close of the prosecution case was not to decide whether the evidence is accurate or whether the defendant is guilty, but whether there is evidence on which a jury could return a verdict. GB NewsR “"Not to decide whether the evidence is accurate or false, whether the defendant is guilty or not, but to review whether there is evidence that the jury could return a verdict,"” Read at GB News ↗
Mixed · 2The count concerns a woman who worked for MTV and who says that in 2001 Brand grabbed her by the arm and tried to pull her into a toilet; she has lifelong anonymity and is referred to as C2. DeadlineN “who we are calling C2 as she has a lifelong right to anonymity” Read at Deadline ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “while working at MTV with Brand in 2001, he grabbed her by the arm and attempted to drag her into a nearby toilet.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ Mixed · 2Brand was charged with three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault, based on allegations from six women dating from 1999 to 2009; he denies all charges. The Hollywood ReporterLC “initially accused of three counts of rape, three charges of sexual assault and one allegation of indecent assault, with six women alleging offenses dating from 1999 to 2009.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ GB NewsR “He denies all seven counts he faces, which include rape and sexual assault.” Read at GB News ↗ Left · 1Other allegations include a rape in a Bournemouth hotel room in 1999, an oral rape in a Soho bar toilet in 2004 and an anal rape at his Hampstead home in 2009; Brand maintains every encounter was consensual. The Hollywood ReporterLC “a woman who says Brand raped her in a Bournemouth hotel room in 1999 following a comedy gig of his.”“He maintains every encounter was consensual.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗
Mixed · 2Before the ruling, the court heard Brand's pre-prepared statements from four police interviews held between November 2023 and July 2025, in which he said he had "led a very promiscuous life" and had "sexual encounters in countless locations and scenarios", but "never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity". The Hollywood ReporterLC ““As I have repeatedly stated publicly and written about extensively, I led a very promiscuous life in the past, which I have spent years openly denouncing,” Brand told the authorities. “I have never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity.”” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ GB NewsR “the jury heard the contents of four police interviews conducted with Mr Brand between November 2023 and July 2025.” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2In those statements Brand called the September 2023 Channel 4 documentary and newspaper reports "defamatory and fictitious" and said they led to further encounters being "invented or reimagined". The Hollywood ReporterLC “a defamatory and fictitious documentary was broadcast in conjunction with the publication of two national newspapers” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗ GB NewsR “further encounters to be invented or reimagined” Read at GB News ↗ Centre · 1On the C3 allegation of oral rape, he said he had "had consensual sex in toilet cubicles at parties but have never forced anyone into a toilet or forced my penis into anyone's mouth". DeadlineN ““I have had consensual sex in toilet cubicles at parties but have never forced anyone into a toilet or forced my penis into anyone’s mouth,”” Read at Deadline ↗
Mixed · 2The prosecution case ended with a few loose ends due on Wednesday morning, after which the defence will begin; Brand could give evidence, and the defence is expected to last two to three weeks, while the trial could run up to six weeks in total. DeadlineN “His team will set out his defense from tomorrow”“This is anticipated to last another two to three weeks.” Read at Deadline ↗ The Hollywood ReporterLC “The trial could last up to six weeks.” Read at The Hollywood Reporter ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- The Hollywood Reporter pairs the charge reduction with Brand's own words, putting "I Led a Very Promiscuous Life" in the headline, and describes the wider allegations in detail.
- Emphasis
- Brand's police statements, the other complainants' allegations and the length of the trial.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not give the judge's explanation of his legal test, or the formal not guilty verdict by a juror.
- Charged language
- “disgraced star”
- For example
-
“The court heard from Russell Brand on Tuesday in the disgraced star’s ongoing rape and sexual assault trial, where the judge also reduced one of his charges.” — The Hollywood Reporter
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Deadline reports the reduction as a procedural step in a continuing trial, drawing on its live video feed of the courtroom, and sets out Brand's statements to police.
- Emphasis
- The complainant's account of the MTV incident, Brand's statements and what happens next in the defence case.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not quote the judge's reasoning, and its count of remaining charges is unclear.
- For example
-
“An indecent assault charge against Russell Brand has been reduced as the prosecution wraps its case at London’s Southwark Crown Court.” — Deadline
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- GB News leads with Brand being "found not guilty" of one of seven charges, and spends the most space on the judge's reasoning and the courtroom procedure.
- Emphasis
- The legal test applied, the juror's formal verdict, and that Brand was not shown photographs of the complainants before the police interviews.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not describe the other complainants' allegations or Brand's "promiscuous" remarks as prominently as the other outlets.
- Charged language
- “found not guilty”
- For example
-
“A judge at Southwark Crown Court has directed jurors to acquit Russell Brand of an indecent assault charge at the midway point of his trial, replacing it with a lesser allegation of attempted indecent assault.” — GB News
What every side reports
- The judge found insufficient evidence for the original indecent assault count and it was replaced by attempted indecent assault.
- The count relates to a 2001 allegation by an MTV worker.
- Brand denies all charges and told police his encounters were consensual.
Where accounts differ
-
Timing of the ruling
- Left
- The Hollywood Reporter says it came on Tuesday afternoon after a delay in court.
- Centre
- Deadline says it came on the final full day of the prosecution case, without giving a time.
- Right
- GB News says the judge ruled on Tuesday morning.
-
How many charges remain
- Left
- The Hollywood Reporter says the indecent assault charge was reduced and gives the original total as seven.
- Centre
- Deadline says "There are five other charges", though it also lists seven original counts.
- Right
- GB News says Brand denies all seven counts and faces the replacement charge.
-
There was insufficient evidence for the original indecent assault charge against Brand, so it was replaced with attempted indecent assault.
Reported- Reports 3
- The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, GB News
-
Brand's sexual encounters, which were numerous and in many locations, were all consensual.
Reported- Reports 3
- The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, GB News
-
In 2001 Brand tried to pull a female MTV worker into a toilet.
Reported- Reports 3
- The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, GB News
Russell Brand person
Brand denies all charges and has pleaded not guilty. In police statements he said he led a promiscuous life but never engaged in non-consensual activity, and that media reports led to consensual encounters being reframed.
““I have never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity.”” — The Hollywood Reporter
“he denies all charges and has pleaded not guilty.” — Deadline
Southwark Crown Court organisation
At the court, Mr Justice Bennathan ruled there was insufficient evidence for the original count and said the decision was his, not the jury's.
“That is my decision, not yours. You will be directed to return a not guilty verdict in count two.” — GB News
North America3 outlets
Deadline and The Hollywood Reporter cover it as an entertainment-industry court story, emphasising Brand's statements and the allegations.
“Deadline has been reporting daily from a live video feed of the courtroom since the trial began.” — Deadline
“the actor, presenter and comedian (St Trinian’s, Forgetting Sarah Marshall)” — The Hollywood Reporter
Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, Variety
UK and Ireland1 outlet
GB News, based in the UK, concentrates on the judge's legal reasoning and the formal verdict.
“The judge described the procedural steps as a "slightly artificial process"” — GB News
GB News
Left2 articles
-
Critical Foregrounds Brand's admissions of promiscuity and details the allegations against him, calling him a "disgraced star".

-

Centre1 article
-
Russell Brand Indecent Assault Charged Reduced By Judge: Trial Continues
Neutral Procedural, courtroom-based report of the reduction, with extended quotes from Brand's police statements and a content warning.

Right1 article
-
GB NewsR ·
Russell Brand found not guilty of one of seven charges against him, judge rules
Neutral Leads with a not guilty headline and gives a detailed account of the judge's reasoning and the courtroom formalities.

- 27 Oct 15:49 First DeadlineN Russell Brand Indecent Assault Charged Reduced By Judge: Trial Continues
- 27 Oct 15:50 +1m The Hollywood ReporterLC Russell Brand Trial: Judge Reduces One Charge to Attempted Indecent Assault as Star Says “I Led a Very Promiscuous Life”
- 27 Oct 15:57 +8m GB NewsR Russell Brand found not guilty of one of seven charges against him, judge rules
- 27 Oct 16:18 +29m VarietyLC Russell Brand Trial: Judge Drops Indecent Assault Charge, Replaces It With Attempted Assault Count
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…