Skip to content
Bramble

Crime

Judge reduces Russell Brand indecent assault charge as prosecution closes case

At Southwark Crown Court, the judge ruled there was insufficient evidence for one indecent assault count against Russell Brand and replaced it with attempted indecent assault. The prosecution is wrapping up its case, and Brand denies all charges.

4 outlets · 2L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Deadline
Image: The Hollywood Reporter
Image: GB News
Image: Variety

1 / 4

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2On Tuesday 27 October 2026, at Southwark Crown Court in London, Mr Justice Bennathan told jurors there was "insufficient evidence" for an indecent assault charge against Russell Brand, and the count was replaced with a lesser one of attempted indecent assault. Mixed · 2Jurors were directed to return a not guilty verdict on the original count, and a juror formally delivered it; the judge called this a "slightly artificial process", and Brand pleaded not guilty to the new count. Right · 1The judge said his task at the close of the prosecution case was not to decide whether the evidence is accurate or whether the defendant is guilty, but whether there is evidence on which a jury could return a verdict.

Mixed · 2The count concerns a woman who worked for MTV and who says that in 2001 Brand grabbed her by the arm and tried to pull her into a toilet; she has lifelong anonymity and is referred to as C2. Mixed · 2Brand was charged with three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault, based on allegations from six women dating from 1999 to 2009; he denies all charges. Left · 1Other allegations include a rape in a Bournemouth hotel room in 1999, an oral rape in a Soho bar toilet in 2004 and an anal rape at his Hampstead home in 2009; Brand maintains every encounter was consensual.

Mixed · 2Before the ruling, the court heard Brand's pre-prepared statements from four police interviews held between November 2023 and July 2025, in which he said he had "led a very promiscuous life" and had "sexual encounters in countless locations and scenarios", but "never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity". Mixed · 2In those statements Brand called the September 2023 Channel 4 documentary and newspaper reports "defamatory and fictitious" and said they led to further encounters being "invented or reimagined". Centre · 1On the C3 allegation of oral rape, he said he had "had consensual sex in toilet cubicles at parties but have never forced anyone into a toilet or forced my penis into anyone's mouth".

Mixed · 2The prosecution case ended with a few loose ends due on Wednesday morning, after which the defence will begin; Brand could give evidence, and the defence is expected to last two to three weeks, while the trial could run up to six weeks in total.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
The Hollywood Reporter pairs the charge reduction with Brand's own words, putting "I Led a Very Promiscuous Life" in the headline, and describes the wider allegations in detail.
Emphasis
Brand's police statements, the other complainants' allegations and the length of the trial.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the judge's explanation of his legal test, or the formal not guilty verdict by a juror.
Charged language
“disgraced star”
For example
“The court heard from Russell Brand on Tuesday in the disgraced star’s ongoing rape and sexual assault trial, where the judge also reduced one of his charges.” — The Hollywood Reporter

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Deadline reports the reduction as a procedural step in a continuing trial, drawing on its live video feed of the courtroom, and sets out Brand's statements to police.
Emphasis
The complainant's account of the MTV incident, Brand's statements and what happens next in the defence case.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote the judge's reasoning, and its count of remaining charges is unclear.
For example
“An indecent assault charge against Russell Brand has been reduced as the prosecution wraps its case at London’s Southwark Crown Court.” — Deadline

Right1 outlet

Framing
GB News leads with Brand being "found not guilty" of one of seven charges, and spends the most space on the judge's reasoning and the courtroom procedure.
Emphasis
The legal test applied, the juror's formal verdict, and that Brand was not shown photographs of the complainants before the police interviews.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not describe the other complainants' allegations or Brand's "promiscuous" remarks as prominently as the other outlets.
Charged language
“found not guilty”
For example
“A judge at Southwark Crown Court has directed jurors to acquit Russell Brand of an indecent assault charge at the midway point of his trial, replacing it with a lesser allegation of attempted indecent assault.” — GB News

Ask about this story

Loading…