DOJ asks Ninth Circuit to make California set aside 20,000 ballots tied to suspected noncitizens
A Ninth Circuit panel heard the Justice Department's emergency request on 25 October to make California set aside about 20,000 ballots linked to suspected noncitizens. The judges questioned their own authority and the federal data, and had not ruled.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit heard the Justice Department's emergency request on Sunday 25 October to force California to set aside mail-in ballots tied to about 20,000 people the department suspects are noncitizens, and adjourned without a ruling. Fox NewsR “A federal appeals court on Sunday scrutinized the Trump administration's emergency effort to force California to set aside thousands of mail-in ballots” Read at Fox News ↗ Hindustan TimesN “The panel did not issue an immediate ruling but said it would decide the matter as quickly as possible” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2The department sued California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan on 15 October and sent letters to every county asking local officials to help identify potential noncitizen voters. Hindustan TimesN “The department sued California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan on October 15.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ New York PostR “the DOJ sent letters to every county in the state requesting local election officials to help identify any noncitizen voters and gave them 48 hours to comply” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 2It went to the appeals court after U.S. District Judge David Carter did not rule by a deadline the department had requested; a hearing before Carter is set for Tuesday, and the case returns to him if the appeal is rejected. Fox NewsR “The Justice Department sought emergency relief from the appeals court after Carter did not rule by a deadline previously requested by the department.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “If it dismisses the appeal, the case will return to US District Judge David O. Carter in Santa Ana on Tuesday.” Read at New York Post ↗
Mixed · 2Justice Department attorney Matthew Donnelly argued that a processed mail-in ballot cannot be unprocessed and that the harm would be irreversible, citing Los Angeles County's estimate that it had processed more than 500,000 ballots. New York PostR ““Once a mail-in vote is processed, it cannot be unprocessed, and the damage is irreversible and irreparable,” Donnelly said” Read at New York Post ↗ Hindustan TimesN “He cited Los Angeles County's estimate that more than 500,000 ballots had already been processed.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Right · 1Judge Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, asked how the court could issue an injunction he saw as inconsistent with California law adopted under the Constitution's Elections Clause, and Judge Gabriel Sanchez, a Biden appointee, asked why the court should act before the district court rules. Fox NewsR “"It seems to me that you want us to issue an injunction that is entirely inconsistent with the law that the California legislature has adopted pursuant to the Elections Clause,"”“Judge Gabriel Sanchez, a Biden appointee, questioned why the Ninth Circuit should weigh in when the district court has yet to rule” Read at Fox News ↗ Mixed · 2Sanchez also pressed the department on its reliance on unnamed "third party analytics" and on why a July Department of Homeland Security letter cited about 190,000 problematic registrations against 20,000 now; Donnelly said the earlier list had not been vetted and pointed to sworn declarations from two DHS employees. New York PostR ““So what changed in the intervening months to go from 190,000 to 20,000?” he asked.” Read at New York Post ↗ Hindustan TimesN “He cited sworn declarations from two DHS employees supporting the identification process.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Mixed · 2Judge Patrick Bumatay, also a Trump appointee, appeared more receptive to the department, asking California whether it could identify suspected noncitizen voters without an injunction. New York PostR ““Without an injunction, you will never know, correct?” Read at New York Post ↗ Hindustan TimesN “appeared more receptive to the DOJ's concerns” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Right · 2California's lawyer, Sam Siegel, said voters must attest to citizenship when registering and that the executive branch should ask Congress for such authority; the state's filing said the federal theory would "turn the Constitution on its head." New York PostR “if the Executive Branch wants that authority in the first instance, they need to go ask Congress for it” Read at New York Post ↗ Fox NewsR “would "turn the Constitution on its head."” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1California disputes the federal data, and Los Angeles County officials said a preliminary review of part of the list found discrepancies, including people born in the United States or not registered to vote. Fox NewsR “Los Angeles County officials have said a preliminary review of a portion of the federal government's list identified apparent discrepancies” Read at Fox News ↗
Right · 1Bill Essayli, the senior federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, told the New York Post that noncitizens are "actively voting" and that California's counting would "corrupt the integrity" of the midterms, and said the state may be trying to run out the clock. New York PostR ““Our concern is that noncitizens are actively voting in this election and California has confirmed they will count their votes. This will corrupt the integrity of the upcoming midterm election.”” Read at New York Post ↗ New York PostR ““Our biggest fear is they’re just going to try to run out the clock until all the ballots have been processed” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1Essayli pointed to the arrest of 28 people in what authorities called the state's biggest such takedown, charged with fraudulently registering to vote; the New York Post says they were drawn from the 20,000 list, while Governor Gavin Newsom called the DOJ's effort a "clown show". New York PostR “federal agents arrested 28 alleged illegal voters in a sprawling operation that netted targets across California, drawn from the list of 20,000 suspected noncitizens” Read at New York Post ↗ New York PostR “Gov. Gavin Newsom, who blasted the DOJ’s attempts as a desperate “clown show”” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 2More than 3 million people have already cast ballots statewide, including more than 500,000 in Los Angeles County, according to figures cited in the litigation; the election is on 3 November. Fox NewsR “More than 3 million people have already cast ballots statewide, including more than 500,000 in Los Angeles County” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “ahead of the November 3 elections” Read at New York Post ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Hindustan Times gives a procedural account of the hearing, largely relaying New York Post reporting, with attention to the judges' questions on data reliability.
- Emphasis
- Judges' questions about data, the 190,000 versus 20,000 figures, and both sides' arguments.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the 28 arrests or Newsom's reaction.
- For example
-
“The panel did not issue an immediate ruling but said it would decide the matter as quickly as possible, according to the New York Post.” — Hindustan Times
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- The New York Post leads with Essayli's warnings about election integrity and the arrests; Fox News reports the hearing with emphasis on judges' scepticism toward the DOJ.
- Emphasis
- Essayli's quotes, the 28 arrests, calls for voter ID; Fox stresses the jurisdiction and Elections Clause questions.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The Post gives little of California's evidence of discrepancies in the list; Fox gives Essayli no space.
- Charged language
- “scorches”“corrupted”“clown show”“Fraud King”
- For example
-
“LA’s top federal prosecutor scorches California after noncitizen voters battle” — New York Post
“The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit raised questions about both the government's legal arguments” — Fox News
What every side reports
- The Ninth Circuit heard arguments on 25 October and had not ruled.
- The Justice Department wants ballots linked to about 20,000 suspected noncitizens set aside.
- Judges questioned whether the appeals court has authority to act before Judge Carter's Tuesday hearing.
- DOJ attorney Matthew Donnelly and California's Sam Siegel argued the case.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the list of 20,000 is reliable
- Centre
- Hindustan Times reports Sanchez questioned the data's reliability and the drop from 190,000.
- Right
- NY Post quotes Essayli saying "this is not a theory" and citing 28 arrests; Fox says California disputes the data.
-
How the panel leaned
- Centre
- Hindustan Times says judges questioned authority and the data, with Bumatay more receptive to DOJ.
- Right
- NY Post says the judges "appeared sympathetic toward the state’s argument"; Fox says the panel questioned both the government's legal arguments and jurisdiction.
-
About 20,000 California voters are suspected by the federal government to be noncitizens.
Reported- Supports 1
- New York Post
- Reports 2
- Hindustan Times, Fox News
-
The Ninth Circuit panel questioned whether it has authority to act given the Tuesday district hearing.
Reported- Reports 3
- Hindustan Times, Fox News, New York Post
-
The federal list of suspected noncitizens is reliable.
Reported- Reports 2
- Hindustan Times, New York Post
- Earlier 1
- Fox News
Department of Justice organisation
Says noncitizens are voting, that processed ballots cannot be recalled, and that the list is vetted by DHS.
“Once a mail-in vote is processed, it cannot be unprocessed” — New York Post
Bill Essayli person
Says noncitizen votes will corrupt the midterms and that California is trying to run out the clock.
““So what percentage is acceptable? I’d like to know from California,” Essayli said.” — New York Post
California place
Says the federal government has no power over election administration without Congress and that its data is flawed; safeguards against noncitizen voting exist.
“California has disputed the federal government's underlying data while emphasizing that it has robust safeguards against noncitizen voting.” — Fox News
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals organisation
The panel questioned jurisdiction and the merits and said it would rule as quickly as possible.
“Bennett said the three-judge panel would try to issue a ruling as quickly as possible.” — Fox News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
US Justice Department challenges California over 20,000 ballots linked to suspected noncitizens
Neutral Summary of the hearing and Essayli's concerns, citing the New York Post.
Right3 articles
-
LA’s top federal prosecutor says California elections already in jeopardy
Alarmist Pre-hearing interview giving Essayli's fears that noncitizens already voted.

-
Ninth Circuit questions Trump DOJ's emergency request to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots
Neutral Hearing report stressing judges' doubts about jurisdiction and the Elections Clause.

-
LA’s top federal prosecutor scorches California after noncitizen voters battle
Mixed Hearing account framed around Essayli's attack on California, with detailed judges' quotes and voter ID advocates.

- 25 Oct 12:00 First New York PostR LA’s top federal prosecutor says California elections already in jeopardy
- 26 Oct 01:26 +13h 26m Fox NewsR Ninth Circuit questions Trump DOJ's emergency request to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots
- 26 Oct 02:25 +14h 26m New York PostR LA’s top federal prosecutor scorches California after noncitizen voters battle
- 26 Oct 05:44 +17h 44m Hindustan TimesN US Justice Department challenges California over 20,000 ballots linked to suspected noncitizens
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…