Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Kent man appeals third refusal of bungalow with care suite for wife with dementia

David Marks, 78, is appealing Ashford Borough Council's third refusal of a bungalow in Smarden, Kent, where he wants to care for his wife Yvonne, who has dementia and Parkinson's disease. The council says it cannot comment while the appeal is live.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Mail
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Ashford Borough Council has refused planning permission three times for a single-storey bungalow with an attached care suite in Smarden, Kent. The applicant is David Marks, 78, a property developer who lives in Wateringbury. He wants to care personally for his wife Yvonne, who has dementia and Parkinson's disease and has been in a care home in Maidstone for nearly three years. Mr Marks says he fears time is running out, describing his wife's condition as "end of life". He has appealed the latest refusal, issued in June, to the Planning Inspectorate.

Earlier proposals for a five-bedroom, off-grid eco-house were rejected. Smarden Parish Council called one of them an unsuitable "overdevelopment", and planners said the design was not "exceptional" and would encroach on the countryside. The scaled-back third proposal drew no objection from the parish council and letters of support from neighbours. The planning officer still refused it as "unacceptable" because it would develop a greenfield site, although the officer said they had taken the "human rights issues" into account. In his appeal, Mr Marks argues the home would help the council meet housing delivery targets. He also says self-build rules cannot reasonably apply, because his wife's "end of life" may come before a self-build could be finished.

An Ashford Borough Council spokesman said the council cannot comment further while the appeal is under way.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets tell it as a human-interest story: an elderly husband blocked three times by planners while his wife's condition worsens. Both lead with the repeated refusals, with "THREE times" capitalised in the headlines.
Emphasis
Mr Marks's own statements about his wife's "end of life", neighbour support, the parish council's lack of objection, and the gap between that local support and the council's refusal.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither outlet gives the council's detailed planning reasoning beyond the greenfield and countryside points, and neither has comment from Mr Marks's wife's care providers or from the Planning Inspectorate. Both give little weight to the fact that he is a professional developer seeking housing-target arguments, beyond noting his company.
Charged language
“THREE times”“Planning row erupts”“madness”
For example
“Husband's bid to build bungalow with care suite so he can look after his dying dementia-hit wife is turned down by council THREE times” — Daily Mail
“Planning row erupts after bid to build bungalow for dying wife turned down THREE times by council” — GB News