University of Kentucky administrator gets religious exemption from using AI at work
David Durman, a University of Kentucky research administrator and humanist, was granted a religious accommodation excusing him from personally using generative AI at work. He had not been required to use it and sought the accommodation in case it becomes mandatory.
Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from Breitbart.
1 / 3
The story, neutrally told
Centre · 2David Durman, a research administrator at the University of Kentucky, has been granted a religious accommodation that excuses him from personally using artificial intelligence at work, citing his humanist beliefs. NewsweekN “A University of Kentucky employee has been granted a religious accommodation allowing him to avoid personally using artificial intelligence at work after arguing that the technology conflicts with his humanist beliefs.” Read at Newsweek ↗ TechCrunchN “David Durman, a nontheistic Humanist, recently secured a religious exemption from using AI in the workplace.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 2Durman had not actually been required to use AI. Newsweek and TechCrunch both report that colleagues and leadership encouraged employees to try the tools, and that Durman sought the accommodation in advance in case that became a mandate. NewsweekN “But Durman had not actually been required to use AI. He told The Chronicle of Higher Education that he sought the accommodation preemptively because he was concerned its use could eventually become mandatory.” Read at Newsweek ↗ TechCrunchN “he has not been required to use AI at work. Like many workers across fields, some of his colleagues and leadership have recommended that employees try out these tools” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Right · 1Breitbart, the only right-leaning outlet covering the story, describes it differently: it says the university "had been asking employees to use AI tools, including ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot" and that Durman won an exemption from an "AI mandate", citing Tom's Hardware and Religion News Service. BreitbartR “The university had been asking employees to use AI tools, including ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, but Durman sought and received a Title VII religious accommodation exempting him from that requirement.” Read at Breitbart ↗
Centre · 1According to the American Humanist Association (AHA), which helped prepare the request, Durman approached it in late August, met the university's Office of Equal Opportunity in mid-September, and had the request approved on September 25 after the university found it would not impose an undue burden on his department. NewsweekN “Durman approached the AHA for help with a religious accommodation request in late August. He then met with the university's Office of Equal Opportunity in mid-September before his request was approved on September 25, according to the group.” Read at Newsweek ↗ Centre · 2The AHA says this is the first known workplace AI accommodation granted to a humanist. Durman was inspired by Erin Maus, a Unitarian Universalist software engineer in North Carolina who, according to Business Insider, received a similar accommodation in May. NewsweekN “The group says Durman's case is the first known workplace AI accommodation granted to a humanist.” Read at Newsweek ↗ TechCrunchN “He was inspired to seek them when he read that Erin Maus, a Unitarian Universalist and software engineer, was able to secure similar protections for herself.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 2Durman describes humanism as centred on human well-being and flourishing. He objects mainly to generative AI and large language models, arguing that they involve "the offloading of cognitive ability" and that relying on them diminishes people's capacity to act as moral agents. In an AHA statement he also cited AI's effects on jobs, the environment and human creativity. NewsweekN “Durman told The Chronicle that he sees a distinction between tools such as autocorrect and generative AI because the latter can involve "the offloading of cognitive ability" and decision-making.” Read at Newsweek ↗ TechCrunchN ““The way we become moral actors for ourselves and for others is through the active application of our minds, and the diminishing of that [through AI use] is going to necessarily have a negative impact on our ability to do so,” he said” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Centre · 1The accommodation has limits. Per Religion News Service, as relayed by Newsweek, Durman may still be expected to attend meetings involving AI, work with colleagues who use it, or submit materials through sites that use it, but he is excused from personally using AI to do his work. NewsweekN “Religion News Service reported that the university's approval said he may still be expected to attend meetings involving AI, work with colleagues who use the technology or submit materials through sites that use it.” Read at Newsweek ↗ Centre · 2University spokesperson Jay Blanton said religious accommodation requests are reviewed individually, considering the employee's job responsibilities and the circumstances of the request. He said the university determined an accommodation could be provided while the employee continued performing the essential functions of the position, and that accommodations may be reviewed as technology and job responsibilities evolve. TechCrunchN ““In this case, the university determined that an accommodation could be provided while allowing the employee to continue performing the essential functions of their position,” Blanton said in a statement.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ NewsweekN “He added that accommodations may be reviewed as technology and employees' job responsibilities evolve.” Read at Newsweek ↗ Centre · 1Newsweek adds context: the university runs a university-wide AI framework called CATS AI and, according to a Microsoft case study, has standardised on Microsoft Copilot tools. Newsweek notes this does not mean Durman himself was required to use them. NewsweekN “The university's Commonwealth AI Transdisciplinary Strategy, or CATS AI, is a university-wide framework encompassing education, research, healthcare and operations.”“That does not mean Durman himself was required to use those tools.” Read at Newsweek ↗
Centre · 1Newsweek also sets out the legal framework. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires employers to reasonably accommodate religious practices unless doing so would cause undue hardship. The EEOC says this covers sincerely held religious, ethical or moral beliefs, including uncommon ones. Under the Supreme Court's 2023 Groff v. DeJoy ruling, an employer must show "substantial increased costs" to claim undue hardship. NewsweekN “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from religious discrimination and requires covered employers to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious observances and practices unless doing so would impose an undue hardship.”“Religious beliefs can qualify for protection even if they are uncommon, not part of a formal religious organization or held by relatively few people, according to the EEOC.” Read at Newsweek ↗ Right · 1Breitbart adds that humanism is often described as a secular philosophy rather than a religion, but that federal courts have previously ruled it qualifies as one for legal purposes. It quotes AHA attorney Alexandria Huiskens saying humanists should have room to live their way of life at work "the same way Christians do, or Muslims do." BreitbartR “federal courts have previously ruled that it qualifies as one for legal purposes”“everyone should have room to exercise this comprehensive way of life at work the same way Christians do, or Muslims do.” Read at Breitbart ↗ Centre · 2Both outlets link the case to wider religious concern about AI, including Pope Leo XIV's warnings about human dignity. Newsweek notes the pope has not called on Catholics to reject AI, and Michael Naughton of the University of St. Thomas told Business Insider it would be "probably going down the wrong alley" to read the pope's remarks as a right to refuse AI at work. Newsweek also reports that opposition to AI is not a tenet shared by all humanists. NewsweekN “But Leo has not called on Catholics to reject AI altogether.”“Opposition to AI is not a tenet shared by all humanists.” Read at Newsweek ↗ TechCrunchN “Pope Leo XIV has decried AI as a threat to human dignity” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Centre · 1Durman says he is not trying to tell others how to think. He hopes people with similar concerns will pursue a resolution, not necessarily a religious exemption. AHA staff attorney Alexandria Huiskens said she wants humanists and nontheists to know they are also protected by workplace law. TechCrunchN ““I’m obviously not trying to tell people how to think or feel… But I do hope that it encourages people who have similar concerns to pursue not necessarily religious exemption”“we want Humanists or nontheists to know that they fall into these categories — that they are also protected by the law at work,” Alexandria Huiskens, Staff Attorney at the AHA, told TechCrunch.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Right · 1Breitbart devotes its second half to commentary: it calls Durman's humanism "faith" "ironically" closer to the beliefs of AI evangelists and the Effective Altruism movement, and draws on Wynton Hall's book Code Red, which contrasts secular humanism and transhumanism with Judeo-Christian views of human nature. BreitbartR “Ironically, Durman’s humanism “faith” is much more in line with the beliefs of AI evangelists and the Effective Altruism (EA) movement” Read at Breitbart ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets treat the case as a novel test of how workplace religious protections apply to AI. Newsweek leads with the exemption and adds legal and institutional context. TechCrunch leads with the point that nontheistic beliefs can qualify.
- Emphasis
- Newsweek: Title VII, the EEOC, Groff v. DeJoy, the university's AI rollout, the limits of the accommodation, and the pope's stance. TechCrunch: Durman's own explanation of humanism and the AHA attorney's message to nontheists. Both state that Durman had not been required to use AI.
- Leaves out or plays down
- TechCrunch leaves out the approval date, the limits of the accommodation, the legal framework and the university's AI programme. Newsweek relies on secondhand quotes from The Chronicle of Higher Education and Religion News Service.
- For example
-
“But Durman had not actually been required to use AI.” — Newsweek
“You don’t need to believe in a god to get a religious exemption from using AI at work” — TechCrunch
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Breitbart reports the exemption as a win against a workplace "AI mandate", sourcing it to Tom's Hardware and Religion News Service, then pivots to commentary on secular humanism, transhumanism and Silicon Valley using Wynton Hall's book Code Red.
- Emphasis
- Durman's moral-agency argument, the legal basis for treating humanism as religion, the AHA's comparison to Christians and Muslims, and the contrast between secular humanism and Judeo-Christian belief.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not say Durman was never actually required to use AI, nor give the approval date, the university's statement (Jay Blanton) or the Title VII detail such as Groff v. DeJoy that Newsweek reports.
- Charged language
- “AI mandate”“humanism “faith””“immoral Godless technological tsunami”
What every side reports
- Durman, a University of Kentucky administrator and humanist, was granted a religious accommodation excusing him from personally using AI at work.
- He had not been required to use AI and sought the accommodation in case it becomes mandatory.
- The AHA helped him, and it describes the case as the first known such accommodation for a humanist.
- Erin Maus, a Unitarian Universalist software engineer, obtained a similar accommodation earlier.
- University spokesperson Jay Blanton said requests are assessed individually and accommodations may be reviewed as technology and job duties change.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Durman was required to use AI at work
- Centre
- Newsweek and TechCrunch say he had not been required to use AI and sought the accommodation in case it became a mandate.
- Right
- Breitbart says the university had been asking employees to use AI and that he won an exemption from an "AI mandate".
-
Durman was not actually required to use AI at work; he sought the accommodation in case it became mandatory.
Mixed- Supports 2
- Newsweek, TechCrunch
- Disputes 1
- Breitbart
-
Durman is the first humanist known to receive a workplace accommodation excusing him from using AI.
Supported- Supports 2
- Newsweek, TechCrunch
- Reports 1
- Breitbart
David Durman person
Says humanism leads him to value thinking and reasoning for himself, and that AI use would erode that. He sought the accommodation for his own convictions and does not want to tell others what to do.
““For me, this was about me and my convictions,” Durman said.” — TechCrunch
““As a Humanist, promoting the wellbeing and flourishing of humanity is paramount to how I live my life, and I believe that our capacity to think and reason for ourselves is worth protecting,” he said.” — Newsweek
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre2 articles
-
Kentucky Employee Gets Religious Exemption From Using AI at Work
Neutral Explanatory news report that sets the exemption in its legal, institutional and religious context, with caveats about its limits and about what the pope has and hasn't said.

-
You don’t need to believe in a god to get a religious exemption from using AI at work
Sympathetic Feature-style piece told largely through Durman's and the AHA attorney's own words, with an angle on nontheistic beliefs qualifying for protection.

Right1 article
-
U. of Kentucky Employee Wins Religious Exemption from Mandatory AI Use
Mixed Leads with the exemption as a rebuff to an AI mandate, then turns to ideological commentary contrasting secular humanism with Christian views of AI.

- 30 Oct 01:00 First NewsweekN Kentucky Employee Gets Religious Exemption From Using AI at Work
- 30 Oct 01:20 +20m TechCrunchN You don’t need to believe in a god to get a religious exemption from using AI at work
- 31 Oct 15:03 +38h 2m BreitbartR U. of Kentucky Employee Wins Religious Exemption from Mandatory AI Use
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…