Skip to content
Bramble

US

Kurt Olsen resigns from DOJ "grand conspiracy" probe weeks after diGenova's exit

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who backed Trump's false 2020 election claims, has resigned from a Justice Department investigation into officials who probed Trump, weeks after Joe diGenova left. Only left-leaning outlets covered it; reasons for the exit are reported differently.

4 outlets · 4L · 0C · 0R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from CBS News, The Atlantic.

Image: The Independent
Image: ABC News
Image: CBS News

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Kurt Olsen, an attorney who supported Donald Trump's false 2020 election claims, has resigned from a Justice Department investigation known as the "grand conspiracy" probe, according to anonymous sources. The Florida-based probe examines whether former officials plotted against Trump, and reaches back to the 2016 campaign and the criminal cases he later faced. Olsen's exit comes weeks after Trump ally Joe diGenova left the effort without filing a criminal charge.

DiGenova suggested to the New York Post that he was being pressured to bring charges without evidence. Olsen had no previous experience as a prosecutor and was deeply involved in litigation over Trump's 2020 election challenge. The Independent adds that Arizona courts sanctioned Olsen for false statements in litigation for Kari Lake.

The Atlantic, citing the New York Times and Washington Post, says Olsen faced security clearance difficulties and was frustrated by pressure from DOJ officials to move faster; the Independent and ABC give no reason. Olsen could not be reached for comment, and a DOJ spokesperson declined to comment to ABC. ABC says other line prosecutors have also left the South Florida office, though one source said they were temporary detailees whose terms had expired and that more attorneys have been added.

Former CIA Director John Brennan has been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury, and his lawyer said Olsen told them Brennan is also a target of a separate false-statements investigation. Current and former federal prosecutors have questioned the legal theory of charging Trump's foes under a civil rights statute, according to ABC's sources. It is unclear whether any indictments will result or what evidence supports the claim of a plot.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left4 outlets

Framing
Frames the resignation as further evidence of a troubled, weakly founded probe; the Atlantic piece is opinion and goes furthest.
Emphasis
Olsen's election-denial record, lack of prosecutorial experience, diGenova's exit, skepticism from prosecutors, and absence of charges.
Leaves out or plays down
No comment from Olsen, DOJ leadership or Trump allies defending the probe's premise or evidence.
Charged language
“crumbles”“election denier”“top loyalist”“Collapsing Probe”“revenge”
For example
“Trump deep state conspiracy probe crumbles as top loyalist and election denier quits DOJ” — The Independent
“Another top Trump loyalist tasked to help lead a controversial conspiracy probe” — ABC News
“Trump and his allies are starting with a conclusion of guilt and attempting to work backwards” — The Atlantic

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.