Leiden study: Dutch royal house profited from colonialism and backed slavery
A Leiden University study commissioned by King Willem-Alexander found the House of Orange-Nassau actively supported Dutch colonialism and slavery for centuries and profited from it. The king called the findings painful and said they affected him personally.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2A Leiden University study commissioned by King Willem-Alexander found that the Dutch royal house actively supported colonialism and slavery for centuries and profited from the colonial system. It was presented on Friday 2 October 2026. Arab NewsRC “a study that said the royal family reaped huge profits from colonialism and slavery” Read at Arab News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “actively supported Dutch colonialism for centuries, but only rarely determined colonial policy” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Mixed · 2Arab News described it as a five-volume study that the king commissioned in 2022. Al Jazeera described it as a three-year study covering the period from 1600 to the present, carried out by Dutch historians and human rights experts. Arab NewsRC “The five volume Leiden University study, that Willem-Alexander commissioned in 2022” Read at Arab News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “after a three-year study looking at the period from 1600 to the present” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Mixed · 2Arab News reported that the royal family made a sum equivalent to 500 million euros ($565 million) through its links to the Dutch East India Company and the colonies. Al Jazeera reported that profits came mostly from trade in the Dutch East Indies, now Indonesia, and that in the 19th century they accumulated to about $650m in modern terms. Arab NewsRC “a sum equivalent to 500 million euros ($565 million)” Read at Arab News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “profits accumulated to about $650m in modern terms” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Left · 1According to Al Jazeera, the research found the family earned "almost nothing" from the slave trade itself. The study said the House of Orange shares responsibility for the survival of the Dutch slave trade and slavery over the centuries, and noted that most rulers showed no objection to slavery. Al JazeeraLC “the royal family earned “almost nothing” from the slave trade”“the House of Orange shares responsibility for the survival over the centuries of the Dutch slave trade and slavery” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Right · 1Commission head Gert Oostindie, a historian, said the royal family gave "active and unscrupulous" support to the colonial system, including slavery. The researchers also said the family only rarely shaped colonial policy and mainly gave symbolic legitimacy to the empire in the eyes of the public. Arab NewsRC “said the royal family provided “active and unscrupulous” support for the colonial system”“primarily contributed to symbolically legitimizing the Dutch colonial empire for the public” Read at Arab News ↗ Mixed · 2The 59-year-old king called the conclusions "explicit and striking" and said: "It is a painful and confronting conclusion. A conclusion that affects me, even though I am three generations removed." He pointed to his ancestors' lack of "counter-current leadership" and said he was determined to pursue "healing" and "reconciliation". He had apologised in 2023 for his ancestors' lack of action against slavery. Arab NewsRC “The 59-year-old king called the findings “explicit and striking” as he accepted the study at the university.”“determined to pursue “healing” and “reconciliation”” Read at Arab News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “It is a painful and confronting conclusion. A conclusion that affects me, even though I am three generations removed” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Left · 1Al Jazeera added that the findings could revive the debate over reparations in the Netherlands. The government apologised in 2022 for the Dutch state's responsibility for transatlantic slavery but ruled out reparations, creating a 200 million euro fund for social initiatives that anti-racism campaigners have dismissed as insufficient. Al JazeeraLC “The findings could stir up the debate around reparations in the Netherlands.”“creating a 200 million euro ($238m) fund for social initiatives, which anti-racism campaigners have dismissed as insufficient” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Left · 1The National Institute for the Dutch Slavery Past and Heritage (NiNsee) praised the king for commissioning the study but said it should lead to a next phase. Its director, Bianca Groen Gallant, cited school curriculum changes and the conversation about "reparatory justice". Al JazeeraLC “lauded the king for commissioning the study but said it should lead to a next phase” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads with the royal house helping the slave trade survive, then adds the reparations debate and NiNsee's reaction.
- Emphasis
- The study's conclusion on shared responsibility for slavery, the reparations debate and the 200 million euro fund.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not give the 500 million euro total or quote Gert Oostindie.
- Charged language
- “helped the slave trade to survive”
- For example
-
“The research leaves us in no doubt that the House of Orange shares responsibility” — Al Jazeera
“The findings could stir up the debate around reparations in the Netherlands.” — Al Jazeera
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads with the royal family's huge profits from colonialism and the king's personal reaction.
- Emphasis
- The money figure, the king's words and the commission head's remarks, including that the family rarely shaped policy.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Leaves out the reparations debate, NiNsee's reaction and the finding that the family earned almost nothing from the slave trade.
- Charged language
- “huge profits”“active and unscrupulous”
What every side reports
- Leiden University produced the study, commissioned by King Willem-Alexander.
- The king said he was personally affected by the "explicit" conclusions, "even though I am three generations removed".
- The study found the royal family profited from colonialism and supported it, but only rarely determined colonial policy.
- The king apologised in 2023 for his ancestors' lack of action against slavery.
Where accounts differ
-
Size and source of the royal family's profits
- Left
- Al Jazeera: profits came mostly from the Dutch East Indies, about $650m in modern terms in the 19th century, and almost nothing from the slave trade.
- Right
- Arab News: a sum equivalent to 500 million euros ($565 million) through links to the Dutch East India Company and the colonies.
King Willem-Alexander person
Accepted the study, called its conclusions painful and confronting, said they affect him personally, and said he is determined to pursue healing and reconciliation.
“He said the study was just the latest stage of the family’s recognition of its past” — Arab News
“We know the effects of colonialism and slavery are still being felt today.” — Al Jazeera
Leiden University organisation
Its researchers concluded the House of Orange-Nassau actively supported colonialism for centuries but only rarely determined colonial policy.
“actively supported Dutch colonialism for centuries, but only rarely determined colonial policy” — Al Jazeera
Left1 article
-
Dutch royal house helped slave trade to survive, study finds
Mixed Leads with responsibility for the slave trade's survival, adds the finding of almost no slave-trade profit, and frames the findings in the reparations debate.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Dutch study says royal family made huge profits from colonialism
Neutral Straight news report that leads with the profit figure and the king's reaction, and includes the researchers' caveat about limited policy influence.

- 2 Oct 17:53 First Arab NewsRC Dutch study says royal family made huge profits from colonialism
- 3 Oct 00:43 +6h 51m Al JazeeraLC Dutch royal house helped slave trade to survive, study finds
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.