LibreOffice maker says it will not put AI in the default installation
The Document Foundation says LibreOffice will include no AI in its default install for the foreseeable future, citing privacy, user control and open standards. AI remains available through extensions.
1 / 1
The story, neutrally told
Centre · 2The Document Foundation, the nonprofit behind the open source office suite LibreOffice, said in a blog post this week that it "will not add" AI to the software for the foreseeable future. TechCrunchN “it “will not add” AI to its software for the foreseeable future” Read at TechCrunch ↗ ComputerworldN “for the time being, the software will not include any AI in the standard installation” Read at Computerworld ↗ Centre · 1The post followed the late-August release of the latest LibreOffice version, when the foundation said the software "contains no generative AI features" and called this a "deliberate design position". TechCrunchN “the nonprofit reiterated that the software “contains no generative AI features.””““deliberate design position”” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1The foundation said the aim is to ensure users' documents are not uploaded to a server and that no part of the software needs a network connection; it added that the only assurance that survives an audit for organisations handling confidential or personal data is that data does not leave the machine. TechCrunchN “the only assurance that survives an audit is that it does not leave the machine” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Centre · 2It said the decision is not a principled rejection of AI: no current integration meets its requirements, which include privacy, user control and open standards. ComputerworldN “the technology doesn't currently meet the project’s requirements for privacy, user control, and open standards” Read at Computerworld ↗ TechCrunchN ““no integration” that meets all of its requirements” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1According to Computerworld, the requirements include letting users choose where an AI model runs, no telemetry, no lock-in to a single vendor, AI output in the open document format ODF, and fully optional AI features. ComputerworldN “AI-generated content must also use the open document format ODF, and AI features must be entirely optional.” Read at Computerworld ↗ Centre · 2Users who want AI can install extensions that connect LibreOffice to local AI models, and the foundation said it will keep monitoring where the technology is heading and would consider a solution that meets all its requirements. TechCrunchN “extensions will be available for those who wish to integrate AI features” Read at TechCrunch ↗ ComputerworldN “The Document Foundation will consider it.” Read at Computerworld ↗
Centre · 1TechCrunch set the decision against an industry trend of packing in AI features, describing the "enshittification" of software and noting that AI tools often send user data to remote servers. TechCrunchN “bucks the trend of many software makers today that try to pack in as much AI as possible” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present 'no AI' as a deliberate product feature grounded in privacy and user control, not an anti-AI stance.
- Emphasis
- TechCrunch stresses privacy and the contrast with industry AI bloat; Computerworld lists the foundation's requirements (telemetry, vendor lock-in, ODF, optional).
- Leaves out or plays down
- Computerworld omits the extensions route and the August release; TechCrunch omits the ODF and telemetry requirements.
- Charged language
- “enshittification”“bucks the trend”
- For example
-
“LibreOffice says ‘no AI’ is now a software feature” — TechCrunch
“LibreOffice touts ‘no AI’ as a feature” — Computerworld
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The Document Foundation said in a blog post that LibreOffice's default installation will have no AI for now.
- The foundation says this is not a principled rejection of AI but reflects unmet requirements.
LibreOffice organisation
Says it does not reject AI outright but no integration meets its requirements, so the default install will have none; extensions are available.
“there will be no AI of any kind in the default installation” — TechCrunch
“if an AI solution emerges in the future that can meet all these requirements” — Computerworld
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre2 articles
-
LibreOffice says ‘no AI’ is now a software feature
Sympathetic Presents the decision as a privacy-minded counter to bloated, AI-stuffed software.

-
LibreOffice touts ‘no AI’ as a feature
Neutral Short, factual summary of the foundation's requirements for any future AI (republished from Computer Sweden).
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 6 Oct 16:25 First TechCrunchN LibreOffice says ‘no AI’ is now a software feature
- 7 Oct 14:41 +22h 16m ComputerworldN LibreOffice touts ‘no AI’ as a feature
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.