Skip to content
Bramble

Economy

London business groups warn Chancellor Healey against £1bn office business rates rise

Business and property bodies have warned Chancellor John Healey against a reported £1bn increase in business rates on expensive London offices ahead of his 28 October Budget. The Treasury declined to comment on speculation.

3 outlets · 0L · 1C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Evening Standard
Image: City A.M.
Image: Daily Mail

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Business and property groups have warned Chancellor John Healey not to raise about £1bn through higher business rates on expensive office buildings, ahead of his first Budget on 28 October. Mixed · 2The proposal was first reported by The Telegraph: business rates would rise for commercial buildings with a rateable value above £500,000, raising about £1bn for the Treasury. Mixed · 2The change would fall hardest on London, particularly the Square Mile and Canary Wharf, with about 9,000 properties in London and the South East affected, according to experts (City A.M. names the tax firm Ryan); the high street, hospitality and warehouses might be protected.

Centre · 1John Dickie, chief executive of BusinessLDN, said hiking taxes on large offices risked undermining the UK's ability to attract international investment, and urged the government to deliver its manifesto commitment to replace the business rates system instead of making piecemeal changes. Right · 1City A.M. also quoted Vanessa Hale of Real Estate UK, who called it an "attack on growth policy" that masks the failure to reform business rates properly, and Nikki Dibley, chair of the City Property Association, who warned of "less investment, fewer jobs and lower tax revenues for the whole country". Right · 1A Treasury spokesperson said decisions on tax are a matter for the Chancellor at fiscal events, rather than routinely commenting on rumour, speculation or proposals.

Centre · 1The Evening Standard places the story in the context of a slowing economy: Healey, speaking at an IMF summit in Bangkok, said the Budget would be tough and that departments must "manage with the budgets we’ve got", while the IMF praised the UK's deficit management but warned war-driven inflation may worsen.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Frames the story as a warning to the Chancellor from London business chiefs, set within a tough Budget and slowing economy.
Emphasis
BusinessLDN's quote, risk to international headquarters, the wider fiscal backdrop (IMF, NHS pay, Iran-war costs).
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the Treasury's response or the property trade bodies' comments.
Charged language
“hammered”“raid”“hit City”
For example
“Talk of the “office tax” highlights how London could be in the Chancellor’s sights as he seeks to raise billions more for the Treasury rather than cutting spending.” — Evening Standard

Right2 outlets

Framing
Frames the plan as a "tax raid" and "attack on growth" threatening the City, relaying property industry alarm.
Emphasis
Multiple property-sector quotes, City fears about bank profits, and the Treasury's non-comment.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the wider Budget and economic context, such as the IMF assessment and NHS funding dispute, that the Evening Standard reports.
Charged language
“raid”“attack on growth”“tax raid threat”“alarm bells”
For example
“The tax raid threat will raise alarm bells for the City, with bank bosses already fearing Healey could launch an assault on their profits.” — City A.M.

Ask about this story

Loading…