Medvedev disqualified from China Open semi-final after ball hits spectator
Daniil Medvedev was disqualified from his China Open semi-final against Novak Djokovic after a ball he hit into the stands struck a front-row spectator. Djokovic, who was serving for the match, will meet Alex de Minaur in Tuesday's final.
1 / 3
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Daniil Medvedev was disqualified from his China Open semi-final against Novak Djokovic on Monday after he hit a ball into the stands that struck a spectator in the front row. Gulf NewsN “Daniil Medvedev was disqualified from his semifinal against Novak Djokovic at the China Open after he hit a ball into the stands that struck a spectator in the front row on Monday.” Read at Gulf News ↗ Irish IndependentRC “Daniil Medvedev was disqualified from his China Open semi-final clash with Novak Djokovic after hitting a rebounding ball into the crowd, hitting a spectator in the eye.” Read at Irish Independent ↗ Mixed · 2Djokovic led 7-5, 5-3 and was serving for the match when the incident happened; AP said Medvedev hit the ball in apparent frustration, while the Irish Independent said he had lost a point and hit a ball coming off the wall. Gulf NewsN “Djokovic was serving for the match at 7-5, 5-3 when Medvedev hit the ball into the stands in apparent frustration.” Read at Gulf News ↗ Irish IndependentRC “World number 5 Medvedev was trailing the match 7-5 5-3 and had lost a point when he hit the ball coming off the wall.” Read at Irish Independent ↗ Mixed · 2The spectator was helped out of the arena holding a hand over his left eye; no information on the extent of any injury was given. Gulf NewsN “The spectator was helped out of the arena holding a hand over his left eye.” Read at Gulf News ↗ Irish IndependentRC “The spectator, who was sitting in the first row, clutched his left eye and appeared to be in pain as he walked out of the gallery, assisted by stadium staff.” Read at Irish Independent ↗
Right · 1Speaking on court, Djokovic, 39, called it "a bit of a shock", said he was sorry for the spectator and for Medvedev, and said he was sure Medvedev did not do it intentionally. Irish IndependentRC ““It is a bit of a shock, to be honest. I am sorry for the person.”““I’m sure he didn’t want to do this intentionally.”” Read at Irish Independent ↗ Mixed · 2Both outlets recalled that Djokovic was himself defaulted at the 2020 US Open for hitting a line judge with a ball. Gulf NewsN “The incident was reminiscent of when Djokovic was kicked out of the 2020 US Open for accidentally hitting a line judge in the throat with a ball.” Read at Gulf News ↗ Irish IndependentRC “Djokovic, defaulted at the 2020 US Open for hitting a line judge with a ball” Read at Irish Independent ↗ Mixed · 2Djokovic extended his career record at the China Open to 33-0, and will face ninth-ranked Alex de Minaur in Tuesday's final, as he seeks a 102nd career title. Gulf NewsN “Djokovic extended his perfect career record at the China Open to 33-0.” Read at Gulf News ↗ Irish IndependentRC “will meet Alex De Minaur in Tuesday’s final as he looks to clinch a 102nd career title” Read at Irish Independent ↗
Centre · 1De Minaur reached the final when Hubert Hurkacz retired with an apparent injury midway through the second set, with De Minaur leading 6-4, 3-2. Gulf NewsN “De Minaur led 6-4, 3-2 when Hurkacz - who was barely able to run for balls in the second set - stopped playing.” Read at Gulf News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre2 outlets
- Framing
- AP copy carried by Gulf News: a straight match report on the disqualification, followed by wider tournament results.
- Emphasis
- Medvedev's disqualification, Djokovic's 33-0 China Open record, De Minaur's walkover-style win and other tournament results.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No comment from Djokovic or Medvedev.
- Charged language
- “kicked out”
- For example
-
“Medvedev hit the ball into the stands in apparent frustration.” — Gulf News
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- The Irish Independent leads with the 'shock' of the disqualification and the spectator's eye injury, with Djokovic's reaction.
- Emphasis
- The spectator's pain, Djokovic's quotes and his title chase.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention Hurkacz's retirement or the 33-0 record.
- Charged language
- “shock disqualification”
- For example
-
“Watch: Daniil Medvedev’s shock disqualification at the China Open after a ball hits a spectator’s eye” — Irish Independent
What every side reports
- Medvedev was disqualified from the China Open semi-final against Djokovic after a ball he hit struck a front-row spectator.
- Djokovic was ahead 7-5, 5-3 at the time.
- The spectator left holding his left eye.
- Djokovic will face Alex de Minaur in Tuesday's final.
Where accounts differ
-
How the ball was hit
- Centre
- AP says Medvedev hit the ball into the stands in apparent frustration.
- Right
- The Irish Independent says he hit a rebounding ball coming off the wall after losing a point, and quotes Djokovic saying he was sure it was not intentional.
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre2 articles
-
Gulf NewsN · · via AP
Medvedev disqualified from China Open for hitting spectator with a ball during match vs. Djokovic
Neutral Wire-style factual report of the incident followed by tournament round-up.
-
Right1 article
-
Sympathetic Dramatic account centred on the spectator's injury and Djokovic's sympathetic remarks on Medvedev.
- 5 Oct 15:27 First Irish IndependentRC Watch: Daniil Medvedev’s shock disqualification at the China Open after a ball hits a spectator’s eye
- 5 Oct 15:52 +26m Gulf NewsN Medvedev disqualified from China Open for hitting spectator with a ball during match vs. Djokovic via AP
- 5 Oct 17:13 +1h 47m The NationalN Daniil Medvedev disqualified from China Open after hitting spectator in face with ball
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.