Met chief Rowley defends Putney Pusher inquiry after suspect Nicholas Brandram's death
Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley told LBC he would not apologise for the pressure on suspects and did not "necessarily agree" the family's claim that Nicholas Brandram was obviously innocent. Brandram, arrested in June over the 2017 Putney Bridge bus push, was found dead in September.
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley addressed the investigation into the "Putney Pusher" case on LBC on Thursday 8 October, after the death of suspect Nicholas Brandram. Evening StandardN “Addressing the case on LBC on Thursday, Met Commissioner Sir Mark said” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MirrorL “Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley told LBC's Nick Ferrari” Read at Daily Mirror ↗ Mixed · 2Brandram, 44, a banker and former Army officer, was arrested in June in connection with a 2017 incident on Putney Bridge in which a jogger shoved a woman headfirst into the path of an oncoming bus; he was released under investigation. Evening StandardN “The former Army officer had been arrested in June in connection with an incident on Putney Bridge” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MirrorL “Nicholas Brandram, 44, was arrested in June, nine years after a jogger shoved a female pedestrian in front of a bus” Read at Daily Mirror ↗ Centre · 1He was found dead at a property in Chiswick, west London, last month; on 15 September he missed a family meal and his brother-in-law found him in an upstairs room, and he was pronounced dead at 8.58pm. Evening StandardN “His brother-in-law attended his home address and found Mr Brandram in an upstairs room.”“he was pronounced deceased at 8.58pm” Read at Evening Standard ↗
Mixed · 2At an inquest opened and suspended on 22 September at West London Coroner's Court, the coroner said the death was not considered suspicious and there was "no evidence of third-party involvement"; a full inquest will be held later. Evening StandardN “there was “no evidence of third-party involvement”” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MirrorL “The death is not believed to be suspicious, the Metropolitan Police said.” Read at Daily Mirror ↗ Centre · 1A statement on behalf of his immediate family said he "took his own life after months of immense pressure caused by a Metropolitan Police investigation"; the Met referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which said the Met should investigate itself over the arrest, including its necessity and proportionality, dealings with the media and his welfare. Evening StandardN ““took his own life after months of immense pressure caused by a Metropolitan Police investigation into whether he was the so-called ‘Putney Pusher’””“The IOPC then said the Met should investigate itself over the arrest of Mr Brandram” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2Rowley said the case had been live throughout and that new information led police to treat Brandram as a suspect. He said every criminal suspect is under pressure and "I'm not going to apologise for that". Evening StandardN “we had some new information, and that led us to treating that man as a suspect” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MirrorL “I'm not going to apologise for that.” Read at Daily Mirror ↗
Left · 1Of the family's view that the Met was unreasonable and Brandram was obviously innocent, Rowley said he was not saying he "necessarily agree[d]" but that the Met must review the complaints alongside continuing the investigation. Daily MirrorL “I'm not saying I necessarily agree with that, but we've got to review and look at their complaints alongside continuing the investigation.” Read at Daily Mirror ↗ Mixed · 2His sisters, Alexia Hicks, 40, and Sophie Voelcker, 45, say Brandram did not match the description of the attacker, citing blue eyes against the reported brown, a prominent military tattoo on his forearm, and an email sent from his Bond Street office at 8.13am on 5 May 2017, with the jogger last seen at about 7.55am. They also say he gave a DNA sample about two months before his death and never received the result. Daily MirrorL “Our brother had very clear blue eyes.”“The jogger was last seen by his victim at approximately 7.55am that morning.” Read at Daily Mirror ↗ Evening StandardN “Mr Brandram gave a DNA sample to police some two months before his death but never received the results, his sisters said.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Centre · 1Rowley said the DNA was "not as significant as has been pretended in the media", since a push may leave no recoverable DNA and its absence would not prove innocence, and that it was just one line of inquiry. It remains unclear whether the sample has been processed. Evening StandardN “I think the DNA is not as significant as has been pretended in the media”“It remains unclear if the DNA has been processed.” Read at Evening Standard ↗
Mixed · 2Asked whether the Putney Pusher could still be at large, Rowley said "We have a suspect, he died, family have complained", and when host Nick Ferrari suggested the Met did not know, replied it "could be the person we're investigating". The Met says the investigation continues. Evening StandardN “Well, or it could be the person we're investigating. So let us work it through.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MirrorL “The investigation continues.” Read at Daily Mirror ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- The Daily Mirror leads on Rowley questioning the family's claims of innocence, and gives extensive space to the sisters' evidence.
- Emphasis
- The sisters' detailed case: eye colour, tattoo, the 8.13am email, Notting Hill address, DNA sample.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the IOPC directing the Met to investigate itself or the inquest details such as the date and the brother-in-law's discovery.
- Charged language
- “Britain's top cop”“ghastly incident”
- For example
-
“Britain's top police officer has questioned claims that the prime suspect in the "Putney Pusher" case was innocent.” — Daily Mirror
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- The Evening Standard presents Rowley as breaking silence and addressing criticism of the investigation, with the procedural background.
- Emphasis
- The IOPC referral and direction, inquest findings, Rowley's DNA remarks and the point that the real pusher could be at large.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives less detail of the sisters' specific evidence of innocence.
- Charged language
- “breaks silence”
- For example
-
“Met Chief Sir Mark Rowley has addressed criticism of the Met investigation into Putney Pusher suspect Nicholas Brandram.” — Evening Standard
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Nicholas Brandram, 44, was arrested in June over the 2017 Putney Bridge bus push and was found dead last month.
- Rowley spoke to LBC's Nick Ferrari, said he would not apologise for suspects being under pressure, and did not necessarily agree Brandram was obviously innocent.
- Rowley said DNA was not as significant as the media had suggested.
- The death was not treated as suspicious and the investigation continues.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Brandram was innocent and the Met acted unreasonably
- Left
- The Mirror reports the sisters' evidence of innocence and that Rowley questioned their claims.
- Centre
- The Standard reports the family's claim and Rowley's reply that he is not saying he necessarily agrees.
-
Importance of the DNA test
- Left
- The Mirror says the sisters implied the test would have exonerated him; Rowley said DNA is not so significant.
- Centre
- The Standard says the sisters claim the test would prove innocence; it is unclear whether it has been processed.
Mark Rowley person
Defends the Met's handling: says suspects are inevitably under pressure and he will not apologise, does not necessarily accept that Brandram was obviously innocent, downplays DNA's significance, and says complaints will be reviewed alongside the continuing investigation.
“I'm not going to apologise for that.” — Evening Standard
“the absence of DNA is not going to be the most definitive issue” — Evening Standard
Nicholas Brandram person
Through his family, he is described as having died by suicide after months of pressure from the Met's investigation; his sisters say evidence cleared him and that he gave DNA in order to clear his name.
““took his own life after months of immense pressure caused by a Metropolitan Police investigation into whether he was the so-called ‘Putney Pusher’”” — Evening Standard
“They say the Metropolitan placed him under unfair pressure by not investigating the case fairly.” — Daily Mirror
Left1 article
-
Britain's top cop questions family claims 'Putney Pusher' suspect was innocent
Mixed Frames Rowley as challenging the family's innocence claims while giving the sisters' evidence in detail.
Centre1 article
-
Sir Mark Rowley breaks silence on Putney Pusher investigation after suspect's death
Neutral Procedural account of Rowley's LBC remarks with IOPC and inquest background.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 8 Oct 12:58 First Evening StandardN Sir Mark Rowley breaks silence on Putney Pusher investigation after suspect's death
- 8 Oct 12:59 +1m Daily MirrorL Britain's top cop questions family claims 'Putney Pusher' suspect was innocent
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.