Meta and Snap go to trial in Los Angeles over youth social media addiction claims
Jury selection began on 28 October in Los Angeles in the second trial of individual plaintiffs who say social media was designed to be addictive and harmed their mental health. Meta and, for the first time, Snap are defendants.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Jury selection was due to begin on 28 October in Los Angeles in a trial over the alleged harms of social media to young users, with Meta and, for the first time, Snap as defendants. The Straits TimesRC “Jury selection is expected to begin on Oct 28 in Los Angeles for another landmark trial about the alleged harms of social media on young users, with Meta and, for the first time, Snap as defendants.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ CNAN “The trial, which begins with the jury selection process on Wednesday, is expected to run for several weeks.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2The plaintiffs are identified in court papers as S.J., a 16-year-old from Illinois, and K.D.B., an 18-year-old from Mississippi. They allege features such as autoplay and infinite scroll drove compulsive use and led to depression, anxiety and eating disorders, and CNA reports they also describe self-harm. They sued in 2023 and seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. CNAN “They have alleged that autoplay, infinite scroll and other features drove them to compulsive use, and they developed depression, anxiety and eating disorders as a result.”“They are seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “SJ, a teen in Illinois, began to use Snapchat, the app created by Snap, compulsively and subsequently experienced mental health issues, an eating disorder and self harm, her lawyers claim.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2TikTok and YouTube were originally defendants but settled with both plaintiffs before trial. Meta also settled with the Illinois plaintiff, so the trial covers both plaintiffs' claims against Snap and the Mississippi plaintiff's claims against Meta. A California state judge consolidated the two cases into a single trial. CNAN “Wednesday's trial covers claims by both plaintiffs against Snap, and the Mississippi plaintiff's claims against Meta.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “A California state judge consolidated both cases into a single trial.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Centre · 1Meta and Snap have asked the presiding judge, Carolyn Kuhl of Los Angeles Superior Court, to split the cases into separate trials, arguing a joint trial would unfairly mix up the evidence. CNA reported that she had not yet ruled on the request. CNAN “Meta and Snap have asked Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl, presiding over the proceedings, to split the cases into separate trials, arguing that trying them together would unfairly mix up the evidence for jurors.” Read at CNA ↗ Right · 1According to AFP, opening statements are set for 4 November if no further settlements are reached, with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram head Adam Mosseri and Snap CEO Evan Spiegel expected to testify from mid-November. The Straits TimesRC “If no additional settlements are reached before opening statements kick off on Nov 4, the new trial will move forward with both Meta and Snap as defendants.”“Star witnesses are expected to testify beginning mid-November including Meta chief executive officer (CEO) Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, and Snap CEO Evan Spiegel.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2The case follows the first bellwether trial, in which a Los Angeles jury found Meta and YouTube liable for harming a young woman known as KGM (Kaley G.M.), with $6 million in damages. CNA dates that verdict to March, and Meta said it "respectfully disagree[s]" with it. Snap and TikTok had settled with KGM beforehand. The Straits TimesRC “Meta and YouTube lost the first so-called bellwether case earlier in 2026, when a jury found them collectively liable for harming a young user known by the initials KGM”“Snap and TikTok settled with KGM ahead of that trial.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ CNAN “Social media companies lost the first such trial to the tune of $6 million in damages in March.” Read at CNA ↗
Mixed · 2Other cases set for trial since then have been settled or dropped. AFP says Snap, TikTok and YouTube settled one set for August, after which that plaintiff, RKC, withdrew the remaining claims against Meta. The Straits TimesRC “that plaintiff, known as RKC, then withdrew their remaining claims against Meta, allowing the Instagram and Facebook maker to avoid trial without a settlement.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ CNAN “There have been multiple cases scheduled for trial since then, but the companies have settled the claims or, in some cases, the plaintiffs have chosen to drop them.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2Meta denies the claims. A spokesperson told CNA that a young person's mental health is shaped by many factors, that the Mississippi plaintiff "used TikTok far more than Instagram or Facebook", and that her personal circumstances were a substantial factor in her struggles. Snap says Snapchat differs from traditional social media because it does not open to a feed, and that the allegations "fundamentally misrepresent" the plaintiffs' experiences. CNAN “The plaintiff used TikTok far more than Instagram or Facebook, and her personal circumstances were a substantial factor in her struggles.”“A Snap spokesperson said its Snapchat platform is different from traditional social media because it does not open to a feed or a ranking of what other people post.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “Snap intends to argue that it is different from other apps like Meta’s Instagram and Facebook because of Snapchat’s focus on primarily being a messaging platform.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Centre · 1Emily Jeffcott, attorney for the Mississippi plaintiff, said the lawyers look forward to educating the jury about endless feeds, autoplay and streaks and how Meta, and allegedly Snap, implemented and emphasised them. CNAN “we look forward to educating the jury about the dangers of features like endless feeds, autoplay and streaks and how Meta – and allegedly Snap as well – have implemented and emphasized these features.” Read at CNA ↗
Centre · 1The two cases are bellwethers among more than 3,000 lawsuits consolidated in Los Angeles Superior Court, and CNA says more than 3,800 suits by states, school districts and individuals are pending in federal court in California. The companies have argued Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields them; the trial judge ruled it does not bar claims over how the sites are designed. Meta is appealing the March verdict on that ground, and CNA says a win could derail thousands of lawsuits. CNAN “Their cases are among more than 3,000 lawsuits brought by individuals and others that have been consolidated in Los Angeles Superior Court.”“The trial judge disagreed that Section 230 bars claims over how the sites are designed, and allowed the suits by the two plaintiffs to go to trial.”“Meta is appealing the verdict in the case decided in March, arguing that Section 230 should have barred the claims by plaintiff Kaley G.M.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2Both outlets note Meta's August settlement worth up to $18 billion with state attorneys general, which required changes to teen access to Instagram and Facebook. AFP adds that a New Mexico jury found Meta liable for harms to children with a $942 million penalty, and that a New Mexico judge ordered it to pay $25 billion in a separate data-deception case in October. CNAN “In August, Meta reached settlements worth up to $18 billion to resolve claims made by nearly every US state and territory over the impact of its platforms on teen mental health.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “A New Mexico jury previously found the social media giant liable for harms to children, leading to a combined penalty of US$942 million.”“Earlier in October, a New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay US$25 billion” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- CNA frames the trial as a major legal test, leading with the plaintiffs' allegations and the companies' defences, then the procedural and legal stakes.
- Emphasis
- Section 230, the pending request to split the trials, Meta's appeal of the March verdict, and the volume of pending litigation.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the New Mexico rulings or the RKC settlement detail, or give opening-statement dates.
- Charged language
- “major US legal test”
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- The Straits Times, running AFP copy, presents the case as another in a series of trials and rulings against social media companies, stressing Meta's losses and settlements.
- Emphasis
- Meta's string of adverse outcomes (KGM verdict, New Mexico penalties, $18 billion settlement), the trial schedule and expected star witnesses.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention Section 230, Meta's appeal, the request to separate the trials, or Meta's argument that the plaintiff used TikTok more.
- Charged language
- “landmark trial”“star witnesses”
- For example
-
“Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media’s harms” — The Straits Times
“Meta and YouTube lost the first so-called bellwether case earlier in 2026” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- Jury selection in Los Angeles was due to start on 28 October.
- Meta and Snap are defendants; TikTok and YouTube settled before trial.
- The plaintiffs are S.J. (Illinois) and K.D.B. (Mississippi).
- Zuckerberg, Mosseri and Spiegel are expected to testify.
- Meta settled with state attorneys general in August in a deal worth up to $18 billion.
- The first bellwether trial ended with a $6 million verdict against Meta and YouTube.
Where accounts differ
-
Dollar figure and date of the first verdict
- Centre
- CNA says social media companies lost the first trial for $6 million in damages in March.
- Right
- AFP says Meta and YouTube were ordered to pay US$6 million (S$7.7 million) 'earlier in 2026', though its subheading gives '$7.7 million'.
-
Who is defending which claims
- Centre
- CNA says the trial covers both plaintiffs' claims against Snap and only the Mississippi plaintiff's claims against Meta.
- Right
- AFP says the cases are consolidated with Meta and Snap as defendants and that Meta settled with SJ but not KDB.
-
When the plaintiffs began using social media
- Centre
- CNA says they began using YouTube as early as age 3 or 4 and other platforms around age 9.
- Right
- AFP says court documents say they started using the apps at 13 and 15.
Meta organisation
Meta denies the claims, says it has built protections for a decade, and argues the Mississippi plaintiff used TikTok more and had personal circumstances behind her struggles. It is appealing the March verdict on Section 230 grounds.
“The plaintiff used TikTok far more than Instagram or Facebook, and her personal circumstances were a substantial factor in her struggles.” — CNA
““We will not back away from defending ourselves against baseless lawsuits,” Meta told AFP in July.” — The Straits Times
Snap Inc. organisation
Snap says Snapchat is primarily a messaging platform, not a feed-based one, that it has built safeguards, and that the allegations misrepresent the plaintiffs' experiences.
““We believe the evidence will support that we have put our community first, and that these allegations fundamentally misrepresent the plaintiffs’ experiences on Snapchat and how our platform was designed,” a Snap spokesperson said in a statement.” — The Straits Times
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
CNAN ·
Meta and Snap face major US legal test of youth social media addiction claims
Neutral Explains the plaintiffs' claims, both companies' responses and the legal stakes, including Section 230 and Meta's appeal.
Right1 article
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via AFP
Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media’s harms
Neutral AFP wire copy run by The Straits Times; a rundown of the litigation's history, penalties against Meta, and the trial schedule.
- 28 Oct 02:06 First The Straits TimesRC Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media’s harms via AFP
- 28 Oct 10:06 +8h 1m CNAN Meta and Snap face major US legal test of youth social media addiction claims
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…