Michael Smith jailed 18 months over AI-generated music streaming fraud
Michael Smith, 54, of North Carolina was sentenced to 18 months in prison and ordered to forfeit about $8 million for using AI-generated songs and bots to claim streaming royalties. The US Department of Justice says it is the first criminal case of its kind.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2Michael Smith, a 54-year-old from North Carolina, has been sentenced to 18 months in prison after pleading guilty to a scheme that used AI-generated songs and automated bots to collect millions of dollars in music streaming royalties. MetroLC “The 54-year-old man from North Carolina” Read at Metro ↗ Ars TechnicaLC “a 54-year-old North Carolina man, Michael Smith, was sentenced to 18 months in prison” Read at Ars Technica ↗ Left · 2The case was heard in a New York federal court. Metro, citing Billboard, describes Smith as the first person convicted of streaming fraud in a criminal case. Ars Technica, citing a US Department of Justice (DOJ) press release, says Smith is the first American criminally charged with AI-assisted streaming fraud. MetroLC “is the first person to ever be convicted of streaming fraud in a criminal case, according to Billboard” Read at Metro ↗ Ars TechnicaLC “Smith is the first American criminally charged with AI-assisted streaming fraud” Read at Ars Technica ↗ Left · 1According to the DOJ, from 2017 Smith used fake email accounts and fraudulently obtained debit cards to create thousands of accounts on services including Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify and YouTube Music. Software then pushed bots to stream songs that Smith claimed to own, which the DOJ said were AI-generated. Ars TechnicaLC “Starting in 2017, Smith began using fake email accounts and “fraudulently obtained debit cards” to create “thousands of fraudulent accounts”” Read at Ars Technica ↗
Left · 1By Smith's 2024 arrest, the DOJ says, Smith had created hundreds of thousands of AI-generated songs and spread billions of automated streams among them so the bots would not all target the same song at once and raise red flags. The DOJ's example was April 2023, when the fake songs were streamed 80.9 million times, against 9.3 million streams for Taylor Swift's entire catalogue that month. Ars TechnicaLC “he had created “hundreds of thousands of AI-generated songs,” then dispersed billions of automated streams among them”“Smith’s fake songs were fraudulently streamed 80.9 million times during that month, while Taylor Swift’s entire catalog only got 9.3 million streams” Read at Ars Technica ↗ Left · 1Smith was arrested in 2024 on a three-count indictment and pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy, which carries a maximum five-year sentence. Prosecutors say Smith first used bots to boost their own music before switching to mass-producing AI songs. MetroLC “Smith was arrested in 2024 on a three-count indictment”“wire fraud conspiracy – which he pleaded guilty to one count of – carries a maximum five-year sentence”“Prosecutors claimed that Smith had originally been using bots to boost his own music but then switched to mass-producing AI songs.” Read at Metro ↗ Left · 2Smith must forfeit $8,091,843.64, the amount claimed through the scheme. Metro reports the sum as more than $8 million (£6.04 million) in royalties. Ars TechnicaLC “he must forfeit the $8,091,843.64 that he claimed through his AI scheme, the court ruled” Read at Ars Technica ↗ MetroLC “Smith was sentenced to 18 months in prison and has agreed to forfeit the $8million he gained.” Read at Metro ↗
Left · 2Before sentencing, Smith's lawyers asked for no prison time, arguing that no victim suffered real harm and that the impact on any single artist was insignificant, a "drop in the ocean". Their letter said one man should not be punished for the "ills of an industry", suggested prosecutors were making an example of Smith, and said Smith did not actually pocket $8 million. They added that Smith was "profoundly sorry" and had been offered a $5,000-a-month audio production job, and that jail would delay repayment of the forfeiture. MetroLC “Ahead of sentencing, Smith’s lawyers had asked for no prison time” Read at Metro ↗ Ars TechnicaLC “the DOJ should not be punishing one man for the “ills of an industry.””“offered a job that paid $5,000 per month” Read at Ars Technica ↗ Left · 2Prosecutors disagreed. They said Smith used increasingly deceptive tactics, lied to police when confronted, and needed a stronger sentence for deterrence. Metro reports they asked the judge to consider at least three years. Prosecutor Jamie McDonald said Smith "robbed millions in royalty payments from genuine artists and their fans". The DOJ argued that the scheme cut into shared royalty pools and so reduced payments to genuine artists. Ars TechnicaLC “lied to cops when confronted, and needed a stronger sentence for deterrence”“By cutting into that pool, Smith reduced royalties across the board.” Read at Ars Technica ↗ MetroLC “The prosecutors asked the judge to consider at least a three-year sentence” Read at Metro ↗ Left · 1The Recording Industry Association of America welcomed the ruling, saying streaming fraud harms creators and deceives fans. MetroLC “Streaming fraud harms creators and deceives fans.” Read at Metro ↗
Left · 1Metro places the case in a wider context: Spotify has announced it will label AI-generated music, Deezer said about 90,000 AI-generated tracks are uploaded to it daily, Sony Music and Universal Music Group have sued the AI platform Suno, and label executives estimate streaming fraud costs the industry up to $2.2 billion a year. MetroLC “Deezer revealed earlier this year that an average of 90,000 AI-generated tracks were being uploaded to its platform every day.”“Label executives have previously estimated that streaming fraud could be costing the industry up to $2.2billion” Read at Metro ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets treat it as a landmark prosecution of AI-enabled fraud. Metro leads on the first-of-its-kind sentence and the music industry's wider AI worries. Ars Technica leads on the scale of the bot operation, comparing it with Taylor Swift's streams, and includes the defence's arguments.
- Emphasis
- Metro stresses the industry context (Spotify AI labelling, Deezer upload figures, Sony and Universal's lawsuit against Suno) and the RIAA's reaction. Ars Technica stresses DOJ details of the scheme and the defence's claim of being singled out.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Metro leaves out the 2017 start, the account-creation methods and the defence's claim that Smith did not pocket $8 million. Ars Technica omits the prosecutors' three-year request, the RIAA response and the industry context.
- Charged language
- “scam”“Fraudster”“ill-gotten gains”
- For example
-
“In the first-of-its-kind case, Michael Smith pleaded guilty to using AI and bots to farm millions in streaming revenue from the music platform.” — Metro
“Fraudster jailed for using 10K bots and AI songs to outstream Taylor Swift” — Ars Technica
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Michael Smith, 54, of North Carolina was sentenced to 18 months in prison after pleading guilty.
- He used AI-generated songs and bots to generate fraudulent streams and royalties of about $8 million.
- He was arrested in 2024 and is described as the first of his kind in a US criminal case.
- His lawyers sought no prison time; prosecutors sought a tougher sentence for deterrence.
Where accounts differ
-
What the case is the first of
- Left
- Metro, citing Billboard, calls Smith the first person convicted of streaming fraud in a criminal case. Ars Technica, citing the DOJ, calls Smith the first American criminally charged with AI-assisted streaming fraud.
-
How much Smith gained
- Left
- Metro says the scheme generated over $8 million in royalties that Smith earned. Ars Technica reports the defence said Smith did not actually pocket $8 million, while the court ordered forfeiture of $8,091,843.64.
Michael Smith person
Smith pleaded guilty. Through lawyers, Smith argued that no victim suffered real harm, that individual artists were barely affected, that the case punished one man for industry-wide problems, and that jail would hinder repayment. Smith said they were profoundly sorry.
“His lawyers argued the impact on individual artists was a ‘drop in the ocean’.” — Metro
“noting that he was “profoundly sorry.”” — Ars Technica
Music streaming fraud topic
Streaming fraud is framed as a long-running industry problem, now made easier by AI, that diverts royalties from real artists. Label executives put the cost at up to $2.2 billion a year.
“Now fraudsters can use AI to easily generate endless fake songs” — Metro
Spotify organisation
Metro notes Spotify recently said it would label AI-generated music after backlash from artists and listeners. Spotify is one of several platforms Smith's bots targeted.
“Spotify announced it would be labelling AI-generated music after backlash from artists and listeners” — Metro
UK and Ireland1 outlet
Metro gives the case as a news item, converting figures to pounds and tying it to Spotify, Deezer and the major labels' dispute with AI firms.
“$8,000,000 (£6,040,000)” — Metro
Metro
North America1 outlet
Ars Technica relies on DOJ court filings and the press release, focusing on the mechanics of the scheme and the sentencing arguments.
“In a press release Tuesday, the US Department of Justice said” — Ars Technica
Ars Technica
Left2 articles
-
MetroLC ·
Man jailed after $8,000,000 scam in first of its kind case
Critical Presents the sentence as a landmark case and links it to wider industry worries over AI music, quoting prosecutors and the RIAA.

-
Fraudster jailed for using 10K bots and AI songs to outstream Taylor Swift
Mixed Emphasises the scale and mechanics of the bot scheme using DOJ figures, while giving the defence's argument that the sentence is outsized and Smith is being made an example of.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 7 Oct 10:31 First MetroLC Man jailed after $8,000,000 scam in first of its kind case
- 7 Oct 18:57 +8h 26m Ars TechnicaLC Fraudster jailed for using 10K bots and AI songs to outstream Taylor Swift
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.