Johnson calls peaceful-transfer question "silly," says Republicans will keep House
Asked at a New York campaign stop whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the 3 November midterms, House Speaker Mike Johnson said yes but called the question "a little silly" and said Republicans will keep the majority. Both outlets covering it note his role in efforts to contest the 2020 result.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said on Tuesday 27 October that it was "a little silly" to ask whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power if Republicans lose the House in the 3 November midterm elections. Raw StoryL “called it “a little silly” to ask whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power if Republicans lose the House next week” Read at Raw Story ↗ The IndependentLC ““It’s a little silly you have to ask the question,” the Louisiana Republican responded.” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 1The exchange took place in Orangeburg, New York; Raw Story identifies the reporter as Mychael Schnell of MS NOW. Raw StoryL “Johnson made the remark Tuesday in Orangeburg, New York”“MS NOW reporter Mychael Schnell asked” Read at Raw Story ↗ Left · 2Johnson answered, "Of course, we'll have a peaceful transfer of power, but it will not be transferring because we are going to keep the majority, and I'm gonna be the Speaker of the House." Raw StoryL ““Of course, we’ll have a peaceful transfer of power, but it will not be transferring because we are going to keep the majority” Read at Raw Story ↗ The IndependentLC “I will keep steady hands at the wheel.” Read at The Independent ↗
Left · 2He added that, as a constitutional attorney, he would follow the Constitution: once a state certifies its House members, he would administer the oath on 3 January. He said, "I may not like some of those outcomes, but that's our system, and for anybody to suggest otherwise is absurd." The IndependentLC ““I may not like some of those outcomes, but that’s our system, and for anybody to suggest otherwise is absurd,” he added.” Read at The Independent ↗ Raw StoryL “That’s what I’ll be doing on January 3 to everybody who’s there.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Left · 1The Independent reports that multiple polls indicate Republicans could lose heavily on 3 November, potentially costing them House and Senate majorities, as voters express frustration over the cost of living and the Iran war. The IndependentLC “Multiple polls indicate Republicans could sustain heavy losses on November 3” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2Both outlets recall Johnson's part in efforts to contest the 2020 election: he organised an amicus brief signed by more than 100 House Republicans backing a Texas lawsuit that asked the Supreme Court to throw out Biden-won states' results, and he voted on 6 January 2021 to reject Electoral College votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania (the latter detail from The Independent). Raw StoryL “organized a brief, signed by 125 other Republicans, backing a Texas lawsuit that asked the Supreme Court to throw out results in states won by then-candidate Joe Biden” Read at Raw Story ↗ The IndependentLC “Johnson voted to reject the Electoral College votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania.” Read at The Independent ↗
Left · 2The Independent notes that in 2024 Johnson rejected the label "election denier" and told CBS News that Biden was the "certified" victor of 2020. It also notes that he defended Trump's 2025 pardons of January 6 rioters, saying "We believe in redemption." Raw Story quotes him as saying he doesn't "second-guess" the pardons. The IndependentLC “he rejected the label of “election denier,” telling CBS News that Biden was the “certified” victor of the 2020 election”“We believe in redemption. We believe in second chances,”” Read at The Independent ↗ Raw StoryL “The president’s made his decision. I don’t second-guess those,”” Read at Raw Story ↗ Left · 1Raw Story adds recent context on the Justice Department: on 23 October it sued to block certification of Alaska's Senate race if Sen. Dan Sullivan loses, according to the Wall Street Journal. Attorney General Todd Blanche said the suit aims to prevent voter confusion with a second Dan Sullivan on the ballot, and Trump told reporters he directed it. Blanche also declined to rule out trying to stop certification after the election, saying the department did not intend to "improperly interfere." Raw StoryL “the Justice Department sued to block certification of Alaska’s Senate race if Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) loses”“Blanche said on CNN on Oct. 25 that the suit aims to keep voters from confusing the senator with a second Dan Sullivan on the ballot.”“Blanche also refused to rule out trying to stop certification after the election, NBC News reported.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Left · 1The Independent says Trump was also asked on Tuesday about respecting the midterm results and said he would abide by them on condition that "they're honest elections." It cites an Ipsos survey released this month finding that a majority of Americans do not believe he will accept the results if Republicans suffer losses. The IndependentLC “He said he would abide by the results on the condition that “they’re honest elections.””“A majority of Americans do not believe the president will accept the election results if Republicans suffer losses, according to an Ipsos survey released this month.” Read at The Independent ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets cast Johnson's reply as evasive or irritated and place it against his record on the 2020 election and January 6. Raw Story leads with the unease the answer causes; The Independent leads with him being 'annoyed' and calls him a 'Jan 6 defender'.
- Emphasis
- Johnson's 2020 and January 6 record, the pardons, and the January 6 footage. Raw Story also stresses Justice Department moves on certification; The Independent stresses poll losses and Trump's conditional pledge.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither outlet includes a Republican or Johnson-side response beyond his own quotes, and neither explains why he thinks the question is unnecessary beyond his stated confidence of keeping the majority.
- Charged language
- “sends chills”“swats away”“Jan 6 defender”“baselessly characterized as fraudulent”
- For example
-
“Mike Johnson sends chills as he swats away 'peaceful transfer' question” — Raw Story
“Jan 6 defender Mike Johnson is annoyed when asked if Republicans will have peaceful transition of power” — The Independent
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Johnson was asked on Tuesday 27 October in Orangeburg, New York, whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power.
- He replied that it was 'a little silly' to ask and that there would be a peaceful transfer, but that Republicans would keep the majority.
- He said he would follow the Constitution and swear in members whose states certify results on 3 January.
- Johnson helped organise a brief backing a suit to overturn 2020 results in Biden-won states.
Mike Johnson person
Johnson says he will honour a peaceful transfer, calls the question silly and the suggestion otherwise absurd, cites his constitutional-law background, and says Republicans will keep the majority so no transfer will occur.
“We’re going to follow the Constitution.” — The Independent
““Of course, we’ll have a peaceful transfer of power, but it will not be transferring because we are going to keep the majority” — Raw Story
Left2 articles
-
Mike Johnson sends chills as he swats away 'peaceful transfer' question
Critical Treats the answer as unsettling and surrounds it with a long catalogue of Johnson's 2020, January 6 and DOJ-certification context.
-
Critical Presents Johnson as irked by the question and sets his reassurance against his record backing 2020 fraud claims and defending January 6 rioters.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 27 Oct 21:08 First Raw StoryL Mike Johnson sends chills as he swats away 'peaceful transfer' question
- 28 Oct 14:07 +16h 59m The IndependentLC Jan 6 defender Mike Johnson is annoyed when asked if Republicans will have peaceful transition of power
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…