Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Sen. Mike Lee blocks bill barring Kennedy Center demolition without Congress

Sen. Mike Lee objected to a bipartisan bill from Sens. Merkley and Murkowski that would bar demolition of presidential memorials, including the Kennedy Center, without an act of Congress. Outlets differ on whether the building's condition or Trump's intentions are the central context.

4 outlets · 1L · 1C · 2R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from The New York Times.

Image: Washington Examiner
Image: Breitbart

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

On Monday night, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) blocked an attempt by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) to prohibit President Trump from demolishing the Kennedy Center. Merkley sought passage by unanimous consent, which skips a floor vote if no senator objects; Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski also supported the bill. The Protecting Presidential Memorials Act would bar demolition of any federally authorized presidential memorial without an act of Congress, covering the Kennedy Center, the Lincoln Memorial and the Jefferson Memorial.

Lee told the Washington Examiner that Democrats were wasting the Senate's time with "partisan scaremongering" that had not gone through the committee process. Merkley called it a "common-sense bill" and said Trump first "destroyed its programming, and now, he wants to destroy the building itself." Merkley and Rep. Chellie Pingree said they would keep pushing the bill in both chambers.

In an August court filing, Justice Department lawyers said that without Trump's renovation plan the building could become an "unsafe, decrepit structure" that might have to be taken down. Center leaders told a court the building will not be torn down, and a judge ordered 30 days' notice to the court before any demolition steps. Earlier this month a judge blocked Trump's name from being added to the building, and the venue closed in early September after part of a ceiling collapsed.

The New York Times reported that the president has entertained the idea of tearing the venue down, but analysts say any plan would face multiple daunting challenges.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Explains whether Trump could realistically demolish the Kennedy Center, stressing legal and practical hurdles rather than the Senate vote.
Emphasis
Expert analysis of obstacles to demolition.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention Lee's objection in the coverage.
For example
“Analysts say any plan would face multiple daunting challenges.” — The New York Times

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Straight report of the procedural block, led by Lee's objection and Murkowski's bipartisan support.
Emphasis
The procedure and the bipartisan backing.
Leaves out or plays down
Little on the building's condition, court filings or Lee's reasoning.
For example
“also had the support of Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska)” — The Hill

Right2 outlets

Framing
Washington Examiner reports the block with Lee's and Merkley's quotes and court background; Breitbart stresses the building's poor state and the renovation.
Emphasis
Lee's committee-process objection; the building's collapse and renovation.
Leaves out or plays down
Breitbart gives Lee no quote and leaves out Merkley's quotes on programming and Trump's name.
Charged language
“Collapsing Kennedy Center”“crumbling Kennedy Center”“partisan scaremongering”
For example
“would stop President Donald Trump from demolishing the crumbling Kennedy Center” — Breitbart
“partisan scaremongering” — Washington Examiner