Murdaugh defense and prosecutors clash over evidence and a police chief ahead of retrial
Ahead of a Friday pretrial hearing in Lexington County, Alex Murdaugh's lawyers are seeking DNA, ballistics, crime scene data and information about a possible accomplice. Prosecutors call some requests speculative; his retrial is set for April 2027.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Alex Murdaugh's defense team and prosecutors were due back in a South Carolina court on Friday 16 October 2026 for a pretrial hearing on evidence, ahead of his retrial on charges of murdering his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Fox NewsR “A hearing is scheduled for Friday morning at 10 a.m. to discuss several evidentiary items as both the prosecution and Murdaugh's defense prepare for a retrial next year.” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “Murdaugh, 58, is expected back in a South Carolina courtroom Friday as prosecutors and defense attorneys clash over DNA evidence” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2Murdaugh was convicted in 2023, but the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned the convictions after finding that former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill improperly influenced the jury; he has maintained his innocence. Fox NewsR “The South Carolina Supreme Court later overturned the convictions after finding that former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill improperly influenced the jury.” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “The clerk had instructed jurors to scrutinize Murdaugh's body language and warned them against being deceived by his testimony.” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, in Sumter County, about 80 miles from the Colleton County estate where the killings happened on June 7, 2021; Judge Debra McCaslin ordered the venue change over publicity concerns, and pretrial hearings are being held in Lexington County. A further hearing is set for Nov. 13. Fox NewsR “His retrial is scheduled to begin April 5, 2027.”“A separate hearing will be held on Nov. 13, where more motions will be heard.” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “The retrial will take place in Sumter County, approximately 80 miles from the Colleton County estate where Maggie and Paul were killed.” Read at The Independent ↗
Right · 1Friday's motions concern DNA evidence from Maggie Murdaugh's fingernail clippings and phone swabs, ballistics evidence, raw data from seized cellphones, and raw crime scene data including a FARO laser scan. Fox NewsR “At the center of Friday's hearing are several motions relating to DNA evidence tied to Maggie Murdaugh's fingernail clippings and her cellphone swabs, ballistics evidence, raw data from the cellphones seized during the investigation” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1The defense says the state crime lab identified a male DNA profile under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails that was not fully investigated, and it wants further testing after earlier analysis by Othram, Inc.; attorney Dick Harpootlian argued a partial DNA profile from swabs on her phone should also be tested. Fox NewsR “the defense contended that further analysis is necessary to recover a male DNA profile that, according to the defense, the state crime lab identified but did not fully investigate.”“Murdaugh defense attorney Dick Harpootlian argued that the partial DNA profile from swabs on Maggie Murdaugh's phone should be further tested as well.” Read at Fox News ↗ Mixed · 2The defense also asked for records of shootings in surrounding counties involving .300 Blackout cases or projectiles, which prosecutors called a "speculative fishing expedition for public consumption"; The Independent describes the shootings as spanning eight neighboring counties. Fox NewsR “Prosecutors also called Murdaugh's ballistics request a "speculative fishing expedition for public consumption."” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “Another dispute concerns ballistics evidence from shootings across eight neighboring counties involving the same type of firearm as one of the weapons used to kill Maggie and Paul.” Read at The Independent ↗
Mixed · 2On the crime scene scan, the defense says it needs raw data to reconstruct the scene after receiving only a read-only viewer file in 2022; prosecutors said in a filing the state is happy to provide the original scans, and the defense replied that it wished the state had said so a month earlier. Fox NewsR “Prosecutors handed over a read-only viewer file in 2022, but the defense says it needs the raw data to reconstruct the scene.” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “"The defense is glad to hear it. It wishes only that the State had said so a month ago," they wrote.” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2Prosecutors said the phone data the defense says was withheld was produced in 2022, and accused the defense of "brazen falsehoods" in its public filings. Fox NewsR “The state also said the phone data they requested was produced to them in 2022, and accused Murdaugh's defense of spreading "brazen falsehoods" in its motion.” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “"It is stunning, really. Facts matter."” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2The most contested issue is a late-September defense motion citing press reports, including The Post and Courier, that a state grand jury heard testimony that Yemassee Police Chief Greg Alexander was seen with the murder weapons after the killings, and that a second Yemassee officer is under investigation for transporting and concealing weapons and clothing. The defense seeks a witness statement given to SLED in 2023 that the chief spoke of arriving early and providing Murdaugh a change of clothes, plus interview reports and grand jury material. Fox NewsR “witnesses have testified that the Chief of Police of the Town of Yemassee, Greg Alexander, was seen with the murder weapons in the immediate aftermath of the June 7, 2021, killings”“a Lowcountry police chief spoke of arriving early at the scene and of providing Defendant Murdaugh a change of clothes” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “Among the most contentious issues is whether prosecutors have convened a grand jury to investigate a police officer who was friends with Murdaugh.” Read at The Independent ↗
Mixed · 2The Post and Courier could not corroborate the allegations. Alexander, through attorney Joe McCulloch, denied them and called them "ridiculous rumors and gossip"; prosecutors, in an Oct. 8 filing, neither confirmed nor denied an investigation, citing grand jury confidentiality, and said they will turn over information when legally obligated. Fox NewsR “Notably, the allegations couldn't be corroborated by The Post and Courier.”“"That truth will outlive any ridiculous rumors and gossip."” Read at Fox News ↗ The IndependentLC “Prosecutors have declined to confirm whether such evidence exists, citing legal restrictions surrounding grand jury proceedings.” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2The defense argues that evidence of another person's involvement could undermine the prosecution's theory, which at the first trial was that Murdaugh acted alone and that the weapons and bloody clothing were never recovered; The Independent notes the claims do not establish that the officer was involved or that any accomplice existed. The IndependentLC “Murdaugh's lawyers argue that any evidence suggesting another person was involved could undermine the prosecution's account of the murders.”“The defense's claims do not establish that the officer was involved in the killings or that any accomplice existed.” Read at The Independent ↗ Fox NewsR “Prosecutors had previously acknowledged that the weapons were never recovered by police.” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1Former prosecutor Joshua Ritter told Fox News Digital he sees the police chief allegation as a "wild goose chase" and the filings as "borderline delay tactics", though he expects the judge to ensure the defense gets what it is owed and does not expect a delay to the retrial. Fox NewsR “I don't see any reason for the judge to allow for this essentially wild goose chase in regards to an uncorroborated report about law enforcement perhaps being in possession of the murder weapon.”“I don't see this causing any kind of delay moving forward,” Read at Fox News ↗
Left · 1Murdaugh pleaded guilty to stealing about $12 million from clients and is serving a 40-year federal sentence and a concurrent 27-year state sentence, so he will remain in prison whatever the retrial outcome. The IndependentLC “He subsequently pleaded guilty to stealing approximately $12 million and is serving a 40-year federal prison sentence alongside a concurrent 27-year state sentence for financial crimes.”“Regardless of the outcome of his second murder trial, Murdaugh will remain behind bars.” Read at The Independent ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads with the defense raising questions about a possible accomplice and a bitter, escalating courtroom fight, while noting the claims prove nothing.
- Emphasis
- The hostile tone of filings, the grand jury question, the no-accomplice prosecution theory, and Murdaugh's financial crimes and continued imprisonment.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not name Yemassee Police Chief Greg Alexander or report his denial, nor that the press reports could not be corroborated.
- Charged language
- “explosive questions”“bitter courtroom battle”
- For example
-
“Alex Murdaugh's legal team is demanding answers about a police officer who may have helped conceal evidence in the murders of his wife and son” — The Independent
“The defense's claims do not establish that the officer was involved in the killings or that any accomplice existed.” — The Independent
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Frames the defense push on the police chief as a long shot, led by a former prosecutor's 'wild goose chase' assessment.
- Emphasis
- The chief's name and denial, the lack of corroboration, prosecutors' criticism of defense requests, and the expert's view that the filings are delay tactics.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention that Murdaugh's financial-crime sentences keep him in prison regardless of the retrial; the defense was not quoted beyond its filings.
- Charged language
- “wild goose chase”“borderline delay tactics”“grasping at straws”
What every side reports
- Murdaugh's 2023 murder convictions were overturned after the South Carolina Supreme Court found a court clerk improperly influenced jurors.
- His retrial is scheduled for April 2027 and a pretrial hearing was due on Friday 16 October 2026.
- The murder weapons have never been recovered.
- Prosecutors have neither confirmed nor denied a grand jury investigation, citing confidentiality.
- Prosecutors and defense lawyers are in dispute over DNA, ballistics, cellphone and crime scene scan evidence.
Where accounts differ
-
Significance of the police chief allegation
- Left
- The Independent presents it as raising 'explosive questions' about a possible accomplice, while noting the claims do not establish involvement.
- Centre
- No centre outlet covered the story.
- Right
- Fox News, via former prosecutor Joshua Ritter, calls it an uncorroborated 'wild goose chase' and the defense filings 'borderline delay tactics'.
-
Whether the defense was denied cellphone data
- Left
- Reports the defense accused the state of withholding cellphone information and prosecutors called the claims 'brazen falsehoods'.
- Centre
- No centre outlet covered the story.
- Right
- Reports the state said the phone data was produced in 2022 and accused the defense of 'brazen falsehoods'.
Alex Murdaugh person
Through his lawyers, Murdaugh maintains his innocence and seeks DNA testing, raw scan data, ballistics records and any evidence of an accomplice, arguing prosecutors may hold evidence contradicting their own theory.
“His attorneys said "if the reports are accurate," prosecutors have held evidence that contradicts their own theory.” — Fox News
“Murdaugh has maintained his innocence in the killings.” — Fox News
Left1 article
-
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers raise explosive questions about possible accomplice
Mixed Highlights the defense's accomplice questions and escalating hostility between the sides, while cautioning that nothing establishes an accomplice.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Alex Murdaugh's 'wild goose chase' for missing murder guns targets police chief: expert
Dismissive Presents the defense's police chief claims as uncorroborated and likely fruitless, relying on a former prosecutor's critique.

- 16 Oct 05:00 First Fox NewsR Alex Murdaugh's 'wild goose chase' for missing murder guns targets police chief: expert
- 16 Oct 10:03 +5h 3m The IndependentLC Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers raise explosive questions about possible accomplice
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…