Skip to content
Bramble

US

Musk and America PAC agree to settle two class actions over 2024 $1 million voter giveaway

Elon Musk and America PAC told a federal judge in Austin they have settled two proposed class actions over the 2024 daily $1 million giveaway to swing-state petition signers. Terms are undisclosed and the settlements need court approval.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Straits Times
Image: The Verge

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 1Elon Musk and his political action committee America PAC said on Thursday 15 October 2026 that they had agreed to settle two proposed class actions over the daily $1 million giveaway they offered before the 2024 US election. Mixed · 2The plaintiffs, Musk and America PAC told the judge overseeing the two related lawsuits in federal court in Austin, Texas, that the settlements are subject to court approval. Mixed · 2The settlement terms have not been made public: the filings did not include them, and lawyers involved declined to comment or did not respond to requests for information, according to Reuters.

Right · 1The plaintiffs are Arizona residents who said Musk and America PAC misled voters in seven swing states into signing a petition supporting the US Constitution by promising $1 million daily to randomly selected signatories. Left · 1The Verge reports the plaintiffs say Musk falsely claimed the prizes would be awarded randomly, that they would not have signed had they known otherwise, and that the petition was a ploy to obtain user data with no limits on America PAC's use or sale of that data. Right · 1The defendants denied the allegations.

Left · 1The Verge adds that Philadelphia's District Attorney sued to stop the giveaway as an illegal lottery, and that at a hearing America PAC representative Chris Gober told the judge the recipients were 'not chosen by chance', which the outlet says contradicted Musk's claim that drawings were random. Right · 1Musk founded America PAC to support Donald Trump's successful 2024 presidential run, and a federal judge said in June that Musk must testify in the lawsuits.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Recounts the giveaway's backstory and the evidence against Musk, centring on the claim that the drawings were not random.
Emphasis
Gober's courtroom statement, the Philadelphia DA suit, and the data-collection allegation.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention that the defendants denied the allegations, or the June ruling that Musk must testify.
For example
“That directly contradicted Musk’s claim that the drawings were random.” — The Verge

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Short Reuters wire report on the settlement filing, focused on procedure and the defendants' denial.
Emphasis
Settlement subject to court approval, undisclosed terms, defendants' denial, June order that Musk testify.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the Philadelphia DA suit, Gober's statement and the data-use allegation.
For example
“The defendants denied the allegations” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…