Skip to content
Bramble

World

Netanyahu asks army, Shin Bet and attorney-general to prosecute participants in Gaza film "NAZA"

Prime Minister Netanyahu asked the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet head and the attorney-general to investigate and prosecute those who took part in the Venice-awarded documentary "NAZA", calling it false and defamatory.

3 outlets · 1L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from ABC News (Australia).

Image: The Jerusalem Post
Image: ABC News (Australia)
Image: Arab News

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2On Sunday 11 October 2026, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked the IDF Chief of Staff, the Shin Bet director and the legal authorities to open a thorough investigation into the participants in the documentary "NAZA" and to prosecute them. Right · 1According to the Jerusalem Post, which cited a letter released by the Prime Minister's Office, the letter was addressed to Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir, Shin Bet Director David Zini and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, and cited severe information security offenses, criminal defamation and damage to Israel's diplomatic and security interests. Right · 2Netanyahu said the film "spins a false, misleading, and biased narrative" that defames Israel and the army worldwide; AFP, carried by Arab News, reports the same statement and names the state attorney as the recipient.

Right · 1AFP describes the film as based on testimony from 24 unnamed Israeli military whistleblowers who accuse the army of killing numerous civilians in Gaza using AI-powered targeting systems; its title is the military term for expected civilian casualties, short for the Hebrew for "collateral damage". Right · 1The film won a special jury prize at the Venice Film Festival, received a 25-minute standing ovation, and has caused a political storm in Israel. Right · 1The Israeli army has "categorically" rejected the film's accusations and doubted the reliability of the anonymous contributors, and Netanyahu has previously said he would back legislation to strip citizenship from people who "defame" soldiers.

Left · 1ABC News (Australia) names the film's directors as Oscar-winning Israeli filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, who it says faced allegations of treason and threats against them and their families; it also reports that NAZA is due to screen in some Australian cinemas later this week. Left · 1ABC adds that Reporters Without Borders and other organisations condemned the Netanyahu government's attacks on NAZA and its team as an example of attacks on the media ahead of the Israeli election on 27 October, and that Netanyahu challenger Gadi Eisenkot had echoed the government's criticism of the film. Right · 1Separately, three Israeli creators released a rebuttal documentary, "NAZA: The Real Story", with English subtitles; the Prime Minister's Office said its makers received certificates of appreciation from public diplomacy directorate head Tzipi Hotovely, and that it features soldiers' testimonies and refutes "blood libels" against troops.

Right · 1AFP adds context that Israel's Gaza campaign, launched after Hamas's 7 October 2023 attacks, has killed more than 74,000 people according to the Hamas-run health ministry, whose figures the UN considers reliable.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
ABC News (Australia) leads with the demand to prosecute any soldiers who took part, and places it in the context of the filmmakers' treason accusations, press-freedom criticism and the 27 October election.
Emphasis
Treason allegations and threats against the directors, Reporters Without Borders' criticism, the election timing, and the film's Australian screenings.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the rebuttal documentary 'NAZA: The Real Story' or Hotovely's certificates (it refers only to a government counter-documentary), nor the casualty toll.
Charged language
“explosive documentary”“war-ravaged strip”
For example
“Israel's prime minister is demanding a sweeping investigation and prosecution of any soldiers who took part in an explosive documentary about his country's conduct in Gaza.” — ABC News (Australia)
“arguing it was an example of attacks against the media ahead of the Israeli election on October 27.” — ABC News (Australia)

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both right-leaning outlets report the demand as a news item built on the PMO statement. The Jerusalem Post stresses the legal grounds and the rival pro-army documentary; Arab News (AFP wire) stresses the film's whistleblowers, its Venice prize and the Gaza toll.
Emphasis
JPost: security offenses, defamation, the counter-film and Hotovely's certificates. Arab News/AFP: anonymous sources, awards, citizenship-stripping legislation, casualty figures.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither mentions the treason accusations against the filmmakers, press-freedom criticism or the election context reported by ABC.
For example
“Three Israeli creators have released a documentary designed to directly counter and discredit NAZA” — The Jerusalem Post
“Awarded a special jury prize at the Venice Film Festival, the film received a historic 25-minute standing ovation, but it has triggered a political storm in Israel.” — Arab News