Skip to content
Bramble

Business

NFL files amicus brief backing states' power to regulate prediction markets

The NFL filed an amicus brief on Thursday supporting New Jersey's Supreme Court petition, arguing states should regulate sports prediction markets such as Kalshi. Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC pushed back.

5 outlets · 3L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Breitbart
Image: The Independent
Image: ABC News
Image: CBS News

1 / 4

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The National Football League filed an amicus brief on Thursday 8 October 2026 arguing that prediction markets such as Kalshi fall under sports gambling and should be regulated by states. Mixed · 2The brief backs a petition from New Jersey, which is challenging a federal appeals court ruling that favoured Kalshi's position that federal commodities law overrides state gambling rules. Mixed · 2The NFL said that on the opening Sunday of the season, $1.8 billion of a $3.3 billion total prediction-market volume, more than half, was tied to its games.

Right · 2The league wrote that "any delay from the Court will result in increasing consumer harm and risk to game integrity," and its concerns include insider information, such as a player deliberately dropping a pass or missing a kick. Left · 1The brief says the Sixth and Ninth Circuits got it right in siding with states, while the Third Circuit ruled for Kalshi earlier this year; about 20 states are in litigation over prediction markets. Left · 1The NFL also questioned the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's capacity, noting it has 543 staff covering many derivatives, and said its requests to bar certain wagers and raise the minimum age from 18 to 21 were rejected.

Mixed · 2Kalshi said the CFTC is actively policing sports markets, that its rulemaking addresses many NFL concerns, and that MLB, the NHL and others partner with it; it also said it tried to work with the NFL and got no reply. Right · 1Polymarket said it shares the NFL's commitment to game integrity but prefers a harmonised federal framework to a "patchwork of disconnected state laws." Right · 1The CFTC's public affairs director, Brooke Nethercott, said the NFL declined to sign a memorandum of understanding with the agency; an unnamed CFTC source said the brief aims at "regulating the regulator" and that NFL staff weeks ago said they were close to commercial deals with prediction market operators. An NFL source said the issue is game integrity and consumers, not opposition to prediction markets.

Mixed · 2On Wednesday Ohio filed a brief backing New Jersey, joined by a bipartisan coalition of 38 states; Breitbart describes the NFL as supporting New Jersey and 40 other states. Other leagues differ: the NHL, UFC, MLS and MLB have deals with prediction market sites, while the NFL, PGA and NBA have not.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left3 outlets

Framing
The Independent frames the filing as the NFL going against the federal government and leans on the legal context of circuit splits and state coalitions.
Emphasis
Court rulings, the 38-state Ohio filing, the NFL's brief on CFTC staffing and rejected proposals.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the CFTC's MOU and 'regulatory capture' comments and the claim that NFL staff said they were near commercial deals.
For example
“NFL goes against federal government and asks Supreme Court to rule on prediction markets” — The Independent
“conflicting federal appellate decisions have increased the likelihood of Supreme Court review” — The Independent

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Breitbart and Fox News (OutKick) present the NFL's move as a league-versus-industry-and-regulator fight, with heavy space for Kalshi, Polymarket and CFTC rebuttals.
Emphasis
Game-integrity risks, Kalshi and CFTC pushback, other leagues' partnerships, and the CFTC's accusation of bullying.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither mentions the circuit split or the 38-state Ohio brief; Breitbart does not report the CFTC's side.
Charged language
“stiff-armed”“bullying tactic”“regulatory capture”“Gambling Apps”
For example
“The NFL, PGA, and NBA, however, have stiff-armed any involvement with the growing industry.” — Breitbart
“While this bullying tactic may work in the states, the CFTC will not be subject to regulatory capture” — Fox News