Northwestern team holds a single positron for months to test matter–antimatter differences
Physicists at Northwestern University, led by Gerald Gabrielse, kept a single positron trapped for months in a device they call a one-positron quantum cyclotron. They say it could make measurements of antimatter about 30 times more precise.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Researchers at Northwestern University, led by Gerald Gabrielse, trapped a single positron, the antimatter counterpart of the electron, and kept it for months. WiredLC “researchers at Northwestern trapped a positron, the antimatter counterpart of electrons” Read at Wired ↗ New York PostR “A team of physicists recently trapped a single antimatter particle for months” Read at New York Post ↗ Mixed · 2The team built a device called a single-positron quantum cyclotron, which uses electric and magnetic fields to hold the particle in a vacuum at a temperature close to absolute zero, so it never touches a wall. WiredLC “used electric and magnetic fields to hold the positron in a vacuum at a temperature close to absolute zero” Read at Wired ↗ New York PostR “keeping it from ever touching a single wall” Read at New York Post ↗ Left · 1Antimatter annihilates on contact with ordinary matter, releasing energy, which is why it has to be isolated in vacuum chambers and electromagnetic fields. WiredLC “When an antiparticle comes into contact with ordinary matter, the two annihilate each other and release energy.” Read at Wired ↗
Right · 1The New York Post, citing the findings in Physical Review Letters, reports that the team caught the positron as it shot out of radioactive material and cooled it to 0.3 degrees above absolute zero; Gabrielse said the hardest part was slowing the fast particle enough to catch it. New York PostR “first snagged the particle as it shot out of radioactive material, then froze it to just 0.3 degrees above absolute zero”“The hardest part, Gabrielse said, was getting the speedy particle to slow down enough to catch it.” Read at New York Post ↗ Mixed · 2The particle was held in its lowest energy state, which let the researchers induce controlled changes in its quantum behaviour without destroying it, so measurements could be repeated. WiredLC “The researchers were therefore able to keep the single antiparticle trapped for months, allowing them to repeat measurements.” Read at Wired ↗ New York PostR “put the particle into its lowest possible energy state” Read at New York Post ↗ Left · 1The aim is to compare the magnetic properties of positrons and electrons, which have the same mass but opposite charge. Electrons have been measured very precisely, but positrons have been harder to match. WiredLC “researchers want to compare the magnetic properties of both particles” Read at Wired ↗
Mixed · 2According to the American Physical Society, the new device could make such antimatter measurements about 30 times more precise than before. WiredLC “the new device could enable measurements of antimatter particles about 30 times more precise” Read at Wired ↗ New York PostR “the new device could make those measurements about 30 times more precise, according to the American Physical Society” Read at New York Post ↗ Mixed · 2So far no unexpected difference between positron and electron has been found. Gabrielse said current theories predict none, and that if the two proved unequal, "that would be the biggest discovery in physics in the last century". New York PostR ““If it turns out they are not equal, that would be the biggest discovery in physics in the last century,”” Read at New York Post ↗ WiredLC “So far, the experiment has not revealed any unexpected differences between the two particles.” Read at Wired ↗ Mixed · 2The work bears on why the universe is made almost entirely of ordinary matter, although theory suggests the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of both. WiredLC “The universe should therefore contain similar amounts of both, but almost everything we observe is made up of ordinary matter” Read at Wired ↗ New York PostR “when the Big Bang should have created equal amounts of both” Read at New York Post ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Explanatory science piece (translated from WIRED en Español) on what the method means for testing matter–antimatter differences.
- Emphasis
- Why antimatter is hard to study, the method, and what a future difference would mean for physical laws.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not give the 0.3-degree temperature or quote Gabrielse.
- Charged language
- “taming antimatter particles”
- For example
-
“If future measurements find that a positron responds to magnetic fields differently than an electron, scientists would have to revise some of the laws they use” — Wired
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Dramatic, lab-explosion angle with direct quotes from Gabrielse, relayed from Interesting Engineering.
- Emphasis
- Risk of blowing up the lab, the cooling temperature, and Gabrielse's quotes about the stakes.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives less explanation of the magnetic-property comparison.
- Charged language
- “This will blow your mind”“fearless physicists”
- For example
-
“This will blow your mind.” — New York Post
“The fearless physicists at Northwestern University” — New York Post
What every side reports
- Northwestern physicists led by Gerald Gabrielse trapped a single positron for months.
- The device holds the particle in a vacuum with electric and magnetic fields near absolute zero.
- The American Physical Society says it could make measurements about 30 times more precise.
- No difference from the electron has been found so far.
Northwestern University organisation
Its team, led by Gabrielse, presents the result as a first-of-its-kind way to hold and measure a positron repeatedly.
“We actually coaxed this very fast positron to sit there and behave for months at a time” — New York Post
Left1 article
-
WiredLC ·
Scientists Trapped an Antimatter Particle for Months to Study Its Secrets
Neutral Measured explainer on the method and its implications for physics.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Alarmist Sensationalised account stressing danger to the lab, with an aside about the Big Bang theory.

- 25 Oct 12:00 First WiredLC Scientists Trapped an Antimatter Particle for Months to Study Its Secrets
- 25 Oct 21:07 +9h 7m New York PostR Scientists trapped antimatter particle for months — but studying it without blowing up lab was a challenge
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…