Skip to content
Bramble

Science

Northwestern team holds a single positron for months to test matter–antimatter differences

Physicists at Northwestern University, led by Gerald Gabrielse, kept a single positron trapped for months in a device they call a one-positron quantum cyclotron. They say it could make measurements of antimatter about 30 times more precise.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: New York Post
Image: Wired

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Researchers at Northwestern University, led by Gerald Gabrielse, trapped a single positron, the antimatter counterpart of the electron, and kept it for months. Mixed · 2The team built a device called a single-positron quantum cyclotron, which uses electric and magnetic fields to hold the particle in a vacuum at a temperature close to absolute zero, so it never touches a wall. Left · 1Antimatter annihilates on contact with ordinary matter, releasing energy, which is why it has to be isolated in vacuum chambers and electromagnetic fields.

Right · 1The New York Post, citing the findings in Physical Review Letters, reports that the team caught the positron as it shot out of radioactive material and cooled it to 0.3 degrees above absolute zero; Gabrielse said the hardest part was slowing the fast particle enough to catch it. Mixed · 2The particle was held in its lowest energy state, which let the researchers induce controlled changes in its quantum behaviour without destroying it, so measurements could be repeated. Left · 1The aim is to compare the magnetic properties of positrons and electrons, which have the same mass but opposite charge. Electrons have been measured very precisely, but positrons have been harder to match.

Mixed · 2According to the American Physical Society, the new device could make such antimatter measurements about 30 times more precise than before. Mixed · 2So far no unexpected difference between positron and electron has been found. Gabrielse said current theories predict none, and that if the two proved unequal, "that would be the biggest discovery in physics in the last century". Mixed · 2The work bears on why the universe is made almost entirely of ordinary matter, although theory suggests the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of both.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Explanatory science piece (translated from WIRED en Español) on what the method means for testing matter–antimatter differences.
Emphasis
Why antimatter is hard to study, the method, and what a future difference would mean for physical laws.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the 0.3-degree temperature or quote Gabrielse.
Charged language
“taming antimatter particles”
For example
“If future measurements find that a positron responds to magnetic fields differently than an electron, scientists would have to revise some of the laws they use” — Wired

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Dramatic, lab-explosion angle with direct quotes from Gabrielse, relayed from Interesting Engineering.
Emphasis
Risk of blowing up the lab, the cooling temperature, and Gabrielse's quotes about the stakes.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives less explanation of the magnetic-property comparison.
Charged language
“This will blow your mind”“fearless physicists”
For example
“This will blow your mind.” — New York Post
“The fearless physicists at Northwestern University” — New York Post

Ask about this story

Loading…