Skip to content
Bramble

World

Norwegian parliament opens hearings on ministers' Epstein ties

Norway's Storting began public hearings with 11 current and former foreign and development ministers, including Prime Minister Stoere, over ties between Jeffrey Epstein and Norwegian officials. Police investigations and a separate independent inquiry continue.

5 outlets · 1L · 2C · 2R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from Al Jazeera, Anadolu Agency, Arab News. Previously: “Norwegian parliament begins hearings on ministers' Epstein ties”.

Image: South China Morning Post
Image: Al Jazeera
Image: The Straits Times
Image: Anadolu Agency
Image: Arab News

1 / 5

The story, neutrally told

Norway's parliament began public hearings on Wednesday 30 September into ties between the late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Norwegian diplomats and politicians. Eleven people who have been foreign or development ministers since 2005, including Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere, will appear before the committee on scrutiny and constitutional affairs. The hearings follow the US Justice Department's January release of millions of Epstein-related documents, which Reuters says revealed connections to politicians, royals and the wealthy worldwide.

AFP and Al Jazeera say the foreign ministry paid more than 130 million kroner to the International Peace Institute between 1997 and 2018; the institute was headed by Terje Rod-Larsen from 2005 to 2020. Testifying, Stoere, foreign minister from 2005 to 2012, said the institute funding had no link to Epstein and that there was no information Epstein took part in carrying out Norwegian foreign or development policy. He called the problems isolated lapses rather than a systemic culture, said civil servants recommended a 2006 framework agreement with the institute, and denied political instructions to secure funding.

Committee member Jonas Andersen Sayed questioned a rise in annual funding from 4 million to 11 million kroner between 2006 and 2007, and said the documents raise questions of abuse of office and accountability failures. Former foreign minister Borge Brende, who resigned as head of the World Economic Forum, says he did not know of Epstein's past when they met in 2018; former development minister Erik Solheim calls the probe an overreaction. Rod-Larsen, his wife Mona Juul and former prime minister Thorbjorn Jagland are under police investigation over alleged corruption, which they deny, and were not summoned.

The hearings cannot impose sanctions, and a separate independent inquiry with a broader remit is due to report by 31 January 2028.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Frames it as an investigation of 11 senior officials over Epstein-linked state grants, leading with the money and Rod-Larsen's alleged conduct.
Emphasis
The $13.5m in grants, illicit loans and visa fraud allegations, and Stoere's denials.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report Stoere's answers on the 2006 funding increase or Brende's explanation.
Charged language
“launches probe”“illicit loans and visa fraud for sex-trafficked women”
For example
“Norway investigates over $13m in state grants linked to Epstein and top ministers.” — Al Jazeera
“illicit loans and visa fraud for sex-trafficked women” — Al Jazeera

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Anadolu leads with the prime minister's defence of the funding; SCMP (AFP) gives a procedural account of the hearings and the investigations.
Emphasis
Stoere's testimony on oversight and funding decisions (Anadolu); the 130 million kroner and the parliamentary process (SCMP).
Leaves out or plays down
Anadolu omits the police investigations and the independent inquiry; SCMP omits Stoere's testimony.
Charged language
“aggravated corruption”
For example
“Overall, our experience with IPI was positive, and therefore we entered into new agreements,” — Anadolu Agency
“The hearings themselves will not result in any sanctions.” — South China Morning Post

Right2 outlets

Framing
Reuters copy in the Straits Times presents a scandal that has 'shaken the nation's elite', stressing the institutional fallout and the parallel commission.
Emphasis
Fallout for the elite, including Brende's resignation, the Queen's apology, and the rare parliamentary commission.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the 130 million kroner in funding to the International Peace Institute or Stoere's testimony.
Charged language
“a scandal that has shaken the nation's elite”“very poor judgement”
For example
“in a scandal that has shaken the nation's elite” — The Straits Times
“Queen Mette-Marit, wife of King Haakon, has apologised for her friendship with Epstein” — The Straits Times