Skip to content
Bramble

Culture

Novelist Thelyson Orelien denies AI use, admits past plagiarism 'mistakes'

Haitian-Canadian novelist Thelyson Orelien, accused of using AI to write his debut novel, denied it in a statement to AFP while apologising for earlier plagiarism. His publisher says it cannot confirm or deny the AI allegations.

2 outlets · 0L · 2C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: France 24
Image: Gulf News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Centre · 2Thelyson Orelien, a 38-year-old top-selling Haitian-Canadian writer, denied on Tuesday 13 October that he used AI to write his debut novel, in his first detailed response to the scandal. Centre · 1The French-language novel about migration, "C'etait ca ou mourir" ("It Was Either That Or Die"), was set to be translated in more than 20 countries but has been withdrawn from the shortlist for France's Goncourt prize after tests with the AI detector Pangram indicated a 100-percent probability that it contained computer-generated text. Centre · 1In a statement sent exclusively to AFP, Orelien called the claim "slander and heresy". He said he used tools "here and there" for research, particularly for foreign idioms, but that not a single sentence, nor the meaning or structure of the story, was created by a machine.

Centre · 1He said he began writing the book in late 2017 "on the corner of a table" and finished a first draft of more than 300 pages in 2019, several years before AI text generators such as ChatGPT appeared. Centre · 1Last month, at the height of the media storm, Orelien had promised to provide "proof" the book was written without AI. He has not made early drafts available, and his Canadian publisher Boreal has said it cannot categorically confirm or deny the allegations. Centre · 1AFP said Pangram is considered one of the most reliable detectors and that its own test of an excerpt also indicated a 100-percent probability of AI use. Other detection tools gave a range of results, from "very likely" human-written to "100 percent" AI-generated.

Centre · 2Orelien also addressed plagiarism evidence that emerged in media reports in the weeks after the AI claims, notably over a newspaper column and a short story written before the novel. He admitted to "unacceptable mistakes" without naming specific cases, said he was just over 20 and too impatient, and apologised "without reservation". Centre · 1AFP described the affair as one of the biggest AI scandals in the literary world, raising questions about whether AI use is acceptable for novelists and about the reliability of AI-detection apps. Orelien fled Haiti after the 2010 earthquake.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets carry the same AFP report, leading with Orelien's denial and plagiarism apology, and set it against the detector results and the lack of drafts.
Emphasis
The denial, the unreleased drafts, AFP's mixed detector tests and the publisher's non-committal position.
Leaves out or plays down
No independent expert or accuser comment; the plagiarism cases are not named.
Charged language
“slander and heresy”“shrouded in suspicion”
For example
“The book has become shrouded in suspicion” — France 24
“That's slander and heresy," Orelien wrote” — Gulf News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…