O'Loan tells Omagh Inquiry RUC was slow to share information; Flanagan warned of peace process harm
Former police ombudsman Nuala O'Loan told the Omagh Bombing Inquiry that the RUC was slow and incomplete in providing intelligence to her 2001 investigation, and that she believes "something could have been done" to prevent the 1998 bombing.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Baroness Nuala O'Loan, Northern Ireland's first police ombudsman, gave evidence to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry in Belfast on 14 October 2026 about her 2001 investigation into the RUC's handling of the Omagh bomb inquiry. Evening StandardN “The inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is holding evidential hearings in Belfast.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “Northern Ireland’s first police ombudsman, Nuala O’Loan” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Mixed · 2The inquiry is examining whether the Real IRA car bombing of 15 August 1998 could reasonably have been prevented by UK authorities; its current phase looks at how the bomb was carried out and who was responsible. The Irish TimesLC “is examining whether the atrocity could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities.” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Evening StandardN “will examine how it was carried out and who was responsible.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2The reported death toll differs: the Evening Standard (using Press Association copy) says 29 people were killed, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, while the Irish Times says 31 died, including unborn twins. Evening StandardN “which killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “A total of 31 people, including unborn twins, died” Read at The Irish Times ↗
Mixed · 2O'Loan began her probe after a 2001 Sunday People article claimed undercover agent Kevin Fulton had told his RUC handlers that a car bomb was being prepared three days before the attack; she said her team found "nothing to indicate he was unreliable". Evening StandardN “She said her investigation team spoke to Kevin Fulton and there was “nothing to indicate he was unreliable”.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “told his RUC handlers a car bomb was being prepared three days before the attack on Omagh.” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Centre · 1She said she had understood "all relevant material" would be made available by the RUC, and agreed the information first provided was incomplete; early intelligence was redacted and access to the police intelligence database was only eventually granted. Evening StandardN “Baroness O’Loan said she had understood that “all relevant material” would be made available by the RUC.”““When we received intelligence in the beginning, it was redacted” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2She described getting information as "profoundly difficult" and said they were "trying to almost draw teeth". Evening StandardN “it really was profoundly difficult… we were trying to almost draw teeth in terms of getting information out of the police.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “profoundly difficult ... we were trying to almost draw teeth in terms of getting information out of the police” Read at The Irish Times ↗
Mixed · 2Her team learned in September 2001 of an RUC review of the Omagh investigation by Chief Superintendent Brian McVicker; she was told the only copy was in a senior officer's safe and unlikely to be released, and she expressed "astonishment" at not being told of it. A copy was later delivered to her personally by then chief constable Sir Ronnie Flanagan. Evening StandardN “she was told there was only one copy, it was in the safe of a senior officer and was not likely to be made available.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “was later personally delivered to O’Loan by the then chief constable, Ronnie Flanagan.” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Mixed · 2O'Loan said that at a private meeting at Hillsborough Castle on 10 December 2001 Flanagan told her she would "destroy the peace process" and that her office would never recover, and that he later urged her not to publish; she said she was "shocked". Evening StandardN ““He, among other things, told me that I was going to destroy the peace process, that my office would never recover.”” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “Flanagan subsequently urged her not to publish the report.” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Mixed · 2She also described Northern Ireland Office intervention before publication, a leak of her draft to the Sunday Times that she said did not come from her office, little NIO support ("Not particularly, no"), and outrage among some unionists; she said Ken Maginnis's Newsnight remarks on 6 December 2001 called her a "suicide bomber" who had "outlived my usefulness". Evening StandardN “Asked if she felt supported by the Northern Ireland Office, Baroness O’Loan said: “Not particularly, no.”” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “comments made by the former Ulster Unionist MP Ken Maginnis on the BBC’s Newsnight on December 6th, 2001.” Read at The Irish Times ↗
Mixed · 2Her report concluded that even with reasonable action on the Fulton intelligence the bombing was unlikely to have been prevented, and found that police received an anonymous call on 4 August 1998 with detailed information about an attack in Omagh on 15 August that was not acted upon. Evening StandardN “it was unlikely that the Omagh bombing could have been prevented.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC “which contained detailed information that an attack would be made in Omagh on the 15th, but it was not acted upon.” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Mixed · 2Asked by lead counsel Paul Greaney KC whether the bombing could have been prevented, she said that was for the inquiry to decide, but argued earlier Real IRA bombs were investigated individually rather than linked, and that linking them with phone analysis could possibly have hindered the group, making "a very cogent argument" that "there must be something that could have been done". Evening StandardN “it seems to me that there is a very cogent argument for saying that there must be something that could have been done.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ The Irish TimesLC ““now for the inquiry to decide”” Read at The Irish Times ↗ Centre · 1Ian Skelt KC, representing Flanagan, challenged her account, suggesting the RUC had not made a secret of the McVicker review and that the Hillsborough meeting was "much more conciliatory" than she described; she said her team was unaware the report existed. Evening StandardN ““not made any secret””“Mr Skelt suggested it was “much more conciliatory” than she had described.” Read at Evening Standard ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Irish Times leads on the preventability question, that "something could have been done", and the possible benefit of linking earlier Real IRA bombings.
- Emphasis
- Her view on prevention, with the RUC co-operation problems and Flanagan meeting as supporting detail.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not report Flanagan's counsel's challenge or the Sunday Times leak and NIO pressure detail.
- Charged language
- “atrocity”
- For example
-
“The inquiry into the Omagh bombing has been told “there must be something that could have been done” to prevent the atrocity.” — The Irish Times
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Evening Standard ran Press Association-style updating reports, moving from the RUC information difficulties to the Flanagan peace-process warning, with detail on counsel's questioning and the cross-examination.
- Emphasis
- Chronology of her evidence, direct quotes, the NIO and political pressure, and Flanagan's counsel challenging her account.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not carry the Irish Times's different casualty figure of 31.
- Charged language
- “pulling teeth”“destroy the peace process”
- For example
-
“Getting access to sensitive information from police in Northern Ireland about the Omagh bomb investigation was almost like “pulling teeth”” — Evening Standard
“Baroness Nuala O’Loan has said former RUC chief constable Sir Ronnie Flanagan told her that her report into the Omagh bomb investigation would “destroy the peace process”” — Evening Standard
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- O'Loan gave evidence to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry in Belfast on 14 October 2026.
- She described RUC provision of intelligence as 'profoundly difficult' and said they were 'trying to almost draw teeth'.
- Flanagan personally delivered a copy of the McVicker review to her.
- She said Flanagan told her at Hillsborough Castle she would destroy the peace process and later urged her not to publish.
- She said there was a 'very cogent argument' that 'something could have been done'.
Where accounts differ
-
Number killed in the Omagh bombing
- Left
- Irish Times says 31 people, including unborn twins, died.
- Centre
- Evening Standard says 29 people were killed, including a woman pregnant with twins.
Nuala O'Loan person
Says the RUC was slow and incomplete in giving her team intelligence, that Flanagan warned her against publishing, and that earlier Real IRA bombs should have been linked; leaves the question of prevention to the inquiry.
“I think that is now a matter for the inquiry to decide.” — Evening Standard
““he, among other things, told me that I was going to destroy the peace process, that my office would never recover”” — The Irish Times
Omagh Bombing Inquiry event
Public inquiry chaired by Lord Turnbull examining whether UK authorities could have prevented the bombing; currently hearing evidence in Belfast on how it was carried out and who was responsible.
“is examining whether the atrocity could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities.” — The Irish Times
Left1 article
-
‘Something could have been done’ to prevent Omagh bombing, Nuala O’Loan tells inquiry
Neutral Leads on O'Loan's view that something could have been done to prevent the bombing, with RUC co-operation issues as context.

Centre3 articles
-
Getting information from RUC about Omagh like pulling teeth – Nuala O’Loan
Neutral Early report focused on RUC obstruction of the ombudsman's information requests.

-

-
Flanagan told me Omagh report would destroy the peace process – Nuala O’Loan
Neutral Fullest account, leading on Flanagan's warning and adding the preventability evidence and cross-examination by Flanagan's counsel.

Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 14 Oct 12:40 First Evening StandardN Getting information from RUC about Omagh like pulling teeth – Nuala O’Loan
- 14 Oct 14:19 +1h 39m Evening StandardN I was told Omagh report would destroy the peace process – Nuala O’Loan
- 14 Oct 17:31 +4h 50m Evening StandardN Flanagan told me Omagh report would destroy the peace process – Nuala O’Loan
- 14 Oct 20:45 +8h 4m The Irish TimesLC ‘Something could have been done’ to prevent Omagh bombing, Nuala O’Loan tells inquiry
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…