Skip to content
Bramble

US

Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders, Merkley introduce Ban Flock Act on license plate readers

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sens. Bernie Sanders and Jeff Merkley introduced the Ban Flock Act, which would bar federal use of automated license plate reader data and cut federal grants to governments that use the technology.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: Just the News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

RightRep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the Ban Flock Act on Friday 2 October 2026. RightAccording to the Washington Examiner, the bill would bar federal agencies from using or accessing data collected by automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and would prohibit federal grants to state and local governments that use the technology. RightSanders said: "We cannot allow America to become a surveillance state where AI oligarchs profit by giving the government the power to track our every movement." Just the News quotes him, citing Politico, with slightly different wording ("a handful of AI oligarchs").

RightOcasio-Cortez said Big Tech companies like Flock Safety "have built a mass surveillance system to harvest Americans’ private and personal data without their consent" and that the bill would enforce a constitutional right to privacy. RightThe Washington Examiner says Flock operates a nationwide network of roughly 120,000 cameras that capture license plates, vehicle characteristics, and the time and location of images. RightThe bill follows growing scrutiny of Flock. A Washington Post investigation found dozens of police officers had misused the cameras to track romantic partners and others, and in August the company announced tighter oversight, including requiring a criminal case number for every search.

RightConcern is bipartisan. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, invited the CEOs of Flock Safety, Axon Enterprise, Motorola Solutions and Verkada to a Sept. 23 hearing, and is working on his own Stop Flock Abuse Act, which would add restrictions and auditing requirements rather than ban the technology. RightJust the News reports the bill is unlikely to get a vote until after the midterms, because lawmakers are heading home to campaign.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets report the bill as a notable move by progressive lawmakers; the Examiner gives detail on provisions and context, while Just the News is brief and emphasises its political prospects and bipartisan potential.
Emphasis
Washington Examiner: bill provisions, Flock's scale, Washington Post misuse findings, Hawley's rival bill. Just the News: timing and bipartisan appeal.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither includes a response from Flock Safety. Just the News gives few details of what the bill does.
Charged language
“Progressives float a Flock camera ban”“AI oligarchs”
For example
“A group of prominent progressive lawmakers on Friday announced a bill to ban Flock cameras as backlash against the surveillance devices has swept through both parties.” — Just the News
“The bill also comes as lawmakers from both parties have raised concerns about the technology.” — Washington Examiner