Two right-leaning opinion pieces criticise Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate campaign
Opinion columns in the Washington Examiner and JNS criticise Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Senate nominee in Michigan. One challenges his argument that ending Israel aid would pay for domestic programmes. The other accuses him of antisemitism and criticises Democrats who back him.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Abdul El-Sayed recently won the Democratic nomination for US Senate in Michigan, and two opinion columns published on 7 October criticise his campaign from different angles. Washington ExaminerR “Abdul el Sayed, who recently won the Democratic nomination in Michigan” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ JNSR “Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic candidate for Senate in her state” Read at JNS ↗ Right · 1In the Washington Examiner, Hazem Alghabra, a Washington consultant and former State Department official, writes that El-Sayed's message is that America's domestic policies are broken and that ending aid to Israel is the way to fix them. Alghabra calls this a "reductive argument" that is resonating with voters. Washington ExaminerR “America’s domestic policies are broken, and ending aid to Israel is the way to fix them.”“Hazem Alghabra, born in Damascus, Syria, is the founder and president of Frontiers Consultants” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1Alghabra cites figures to rebut it: he says combined federal, state and local spending on social insurance, welfare and education exceeds $5 trillion a year, against a fiscal 2026 foreign assistance budget of about $50 billion. He puts Foreign Military Financing for Israel at $3.3 billion a year out of a roughly $5.52 trillion federal budget. Washington ExaminerR “the enacted fiscal 2026 foreign assistance budget is approximately $50 billion.”“the $3.3 billion allocated annually to Israel through Foreign Military Financing” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1He describes Foreign Military Financing as credit used to buy US-made defence equipment rather than unrestricted cash. He says Congress raised it by about $500 million for fiscal 2027 to support joint missile-defence research, and that it began with the Camp David Accords. Washington ExaminerR “FMF generally operates as credit that recipient countries use to purchase U.S.-manufactured defense equipment and systems.”“Congress increased this funding by approximately $500 million for fiscal 2027.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1Alghabra also argues that interviewers rarely ask El-Sayed to show his work, and that more than half of the foreign assistance budget goes to development, disaster relief and global health. He compares El-Sayed's proposals to "snake oil" and invokes New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's record as a warning. Washington ExaminerR “More than half of the foreign assistance budget supports economic development, disaster relief, and global health initiatives.”“not one that offers snake oil as medicine” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1In JNS, columnist Jonathan S. Tobin focuses on Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), who is campaigning for El-Sayed. Slotkin says she wants someone on "Team Fight" rather than "Team Flight" against President Donald Trump. JNSR “a desire to help someone who would be on what she calls “Team Fight” rather than “Team Flight.”” Read at JNS ↗
Right · 1Tobin calls El-Sayed an "open antisemite". He says El-Sayed won the primary by accusing Jewish supporters of Israel of trying to buy Congress and by portraying Rep. Haley Stevens as a stooge of AIPAC. He also cites El-Sayed's use of words such as "genocide" and "apartheid" about Israel and his refusal to condemn the Muslim Brotherhood. These are Tobin's characterisations, and the article does not carry a response from El-Sayed. JNSR “But electing an open antisemite like El-Sayed would be truly momentous”“He portrayed his moderate Democratic opponent, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), as a stooge” Read at JNS ↗ Right · 1Tobin quotes Slotkin telling MS NOW, "There’s no such thing as the Jewish voters, just like there’s no such thing as the Muslim voters or the black voters." He agrees that citizens vote as individuals but argues she is in effect telling Jews who disagree to "shut up and fall in line". He also criticises Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel for putting party loyalty ahead of opposition to antisemitism. JNSR ““There’s no such thing as the Jewish voters, just like there’s no such thing as the Muslim voters or the black voters.”“essentially telling Jews who disagree to shut up and fall in line” Read at JNS ↗ Right · 2Both columns link El-Sayed to Mamdani and place the race in a wider fight over the Democratic Party's direction. Washington ExaminerR “WITH ABDUL EL SAYED WIN, MICHIGAN DEMOCRATS FALL TO THE MAMDANI LEFT” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ JNSR “El-Sayed and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani” Read at JNS ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both pieces are opinion columns critical of El-Sayed. The Washington Examiner piece attacks the fiscal logic of his Israel-aid argument. The JNS piece frames his candidacy as mainstreaming antisemitism and attacks Jewish Democrats who back him.
- Emphasis
- The Examiner stresses budget arithmetic, what Foreign Military Financing is, and the Camp David history. JNS stresses antisemitism, Jewish security and party loyalty.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither piece quotes El-Sayed's own responses or presents his supporters' case. The Examiner gives no sourcing for its figures beyond the author's assertions.
- Charged language
- “snake oil”“open antisemite”“blood libels”“red-green alliance”“telling Jews to shut up”
- For example
-
“Dr. Abdul el Sayed is prescribing snake oil as medicine” — Washington Examiner
“Electing “progressives” like El-Sayed requires more than just normalizing antisemitism and antisemitic candidates.” — JNS
What every side reports
- El-Sayed won the Democratic nomination for US Senate in Michigan.
- Both columns criticise El-Sayed and connect him to New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani.
Abdul El-Sayed person
As presented by these columnists, El-Sayed argues that ending aid to Israel would help fund education and healthcare, and he campaigns on Gaza and "genocide". The columns do not quote him directly or include a response from his campaign.
“America’s domestic policies are broken, and ending aid to Israel is the way to fix them.” — Washington Examiner
“El-Sayed won his party’s nomination not so much by excoriating Trump but by targeting Jewish supporters of Israel” — JNS
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Washington ExaminerR · · Opinion
Dr. Abdul el Sayed is prescribing snake oil as medicine — and voters are swallowing it whole
Critical Opinion piece arguing El-Sayed's claim that Israel aid could fund domestic programmes does not add up, using budget figures and a medical 'snake oil' metaphor.

-
JNSR · · Opinion
In Michigan, the issue is erasing Jewish interests, not the Jewish vote
Alarmist Opinion column casting El-Sayed as an antisemite and accusing Slotkin, Schumer and Nessel of putting party power above Jewish security.

- 7 Oct 13:00 First Washington ExaminerR Dr. Abdul el Sayed is prescribing snake oil as medicine — and voters are swallowing it whole Opinion
- 7 Oct 21:00 +8h JNSR In Michigan, the issue is erasing Jewish interests, not the Jewish vote Opinion
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.