Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Two right-leaning opinion pieces criticise Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate campaign

Opinion columns in the Washington Examiner and JNS criticise Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Senate nominee in Michigan. One challenges his argument that ending Israel aid would pay for domestic programmes. The other accuses him of antisemitism and criticises Democrats who back him.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: JNS

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2Abdul El-Sayed recently won the Democratic nomination for US Senate in Michigan, and two opinion columns published on 7 October criticise his campaign from different angles. Right · 1In the Washington Examiner, Hazem Alghabra, a Washington consultant and former State Department official, writes that El-Sayed's message is that America's domestic policies are broken and that ending aid to Israel is the way to fix them. Alghabra calls this a "reductive argument" that is resonating with voters. Right · 1Alghabra cites figures to rebut it: he says combined federal, state and local spending on social insurance, welfare and education exceeds $5 trillion a year, against a fiscal 2026 foreign assistance budget of about $50 billion. He puts Foreign Military Financing for Israel at $3.3 billion a year out of a roughly $5.52 trillion federal budget.

Right · 1He describes Foreign Military Financing as credit used to buy US-made defence equipment rather than unrestricted cash. He says Congress raised it by about $500 million for fiscal 2027 to support joint missile-defence research, and that it began with the Camp David Accords. Right · 1Alghabra also argues that interviewers rarely ask El-Sayed to show his work, and that more than half of the foreign assistance budget goes to development, disaster relief and global health. He compares El-Sayed's proposals to "snake oil" and invokes New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's record as a warning. Right · 1In JNS, columnist Jonathan S. Tobin focuses on Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), who is campaigning for El-Sayed. Slotkin says she wants someone on "Team Fight" rather than "Team Flight" against President Donald Trump.

Right · 1Tobin calls El-Sayed an "open antisemite". He says El-Sayed won the primary by accusing Jewish supporters of Israel of trying to buy Congress and by portraying Rep. Haley Stevens as a stooge of AIPAC. He also cites El-Sayed's use of words such as "genocide" and "apartheid" about Israel and his refusal to condemn the Muslim Brotherhood. These are Tobin's characterisations, and the article does not carry a response from El-Sayed. Right · 1Tobin quotes Slotkin telling MS NOW, "There’s no such thing as the Jewish voters, just like there’s no such thing as the Muslim voters or the black voters." He agrees that citizens vote as individuals but argues she is in effect telling Jews who disagree to "shut up and fall in line". He also criticises Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel for putting party loyalty ahead of opposition to antisemitism. Right · 2Both columns link El-Sayed to Mamdani and place the race in a wider fight over the Democratic Party's direction.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both pieces are opinion columns critical of El-Sayed. The Washington Examiner piece attacks the fiscal logic of his Israel-aid argument. The JNS piece frames his candidacy as mainstreaming antisemitism and attacks Jewish Democrats who back him.
Emphasis
The Examiner stresses budget arithmetic, what Foreign Military Financing is, and the Camp David history. JNS stresses antisemitism, Jewish security and party loyalty.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither piece quotes El-Sayed's own responses or presents his supporters' case. The Examiner gives no sourcing for its figures beyond the author's assertions.
Charged language
“snake oil”“open antisemite”“blood libels”“red-green alliance”“telling Jews to shut up”
For example
“Dr. Abdul el Sayed is prescribing snake oil as medicine” — Washington Examiner
“Electing “progressives” like El-Sayed requires more than just normalizing antisemitism and antisemitic candidates.” — JNS