Skip to content
Bramble

Climate

Oxfam: richest 0.1% emit more than poorest 3.5bn and profit from climate disaster recovery

A new Oxfam report says the richest 0.1% of people cause more carbon emissions than the poorest 3.5 billion combined and also gain from investment in climate adaptation and rebuilding. Oxfam is urging higher taxes on the rich and more public climate finance.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: Anadolu Agency

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Oxfam published a report on Tuesday 27 October 2026 saying the world's richest 0.1%, about 8 million people, are responsible for more carbon emissions than the poorest 3.5 billion people combined. Left · 1The Guardian reports that Oxfam also found this group heavily invested in disaster preparedness, recovery and reconstruction, a market projected to grow from $70bn to $92bn a year by 2029. Oxfam calls this a "double dividend" from the climate crisis and says it gives the wealthy an incentive to delay or disrupt climate action. Left · 1Oxfam's new "destroy and rebuild index" lists 217 corporations that either fuel climate breakdown or profit from adapting to it. Last year they made an average of US$1.8bn and paid out $1bn in dividends. BlackRock and Vanguard hold shares in 92% of them, worth more than $1tn, according to Oxfam.

Left · 1The report also says crises tend to boost the profits of food trading companies dominated by billionaires, whose wealth has risen by $120bn since 2020. It cites a 231% surge in cocoa prices after extreme weather in west Africa in 2024, from which it says local farmers gained nothing. Centre · 1Anadolu Agency says the report found the richest 1% responsible for 20% of global warming since 1990. It estimates that one year of their emissions could cause 1.9 million excess heat-related deaths, 78% of them in low- and lower-middle-income countries, which account for just 8% of global emissions. It also projects nearly $53 trillion in economic damage by 2050. Mixed · 2Both outlets cite Oxfam's finding that private jets emit more CO2 in two seconds than most people, or a person in the poorest half, emit in a year.

Mixed · 2The two outlets give different figures for how much more an individual in the richest 0.1% contributes to extreme heat. The Guardian says 125 times more than the average person. Anadolu says nearly 400 times more than someone in the poorest 50%. Mixed · 2Oxfam officials describe the situation as one of unequal responsibility. Executive Director Amitabh Behar said: "This is not a tragedy of shared fate; it is a crime of extreme inequality." Jean McLean, chief influencing officer, accused billionaires of turning chaos into profit. Lead author Alex Maitland told the Guardian "This is deliberate", saying the evidence of political influence is "pretty damning". Mixed · 2Oxfam says the wealthy are insulated from climate harm and so less likely to use their lobbying power for climate action. It also says disasters are used to push privatisation, land grabs, deregulation and tax breaks for the super-rich.

Mixed · 2Oxfam calls on governments attending COP31 to make wealthy polluters pay through higher taxes, to increase public climate finance for the Global South, and to triple adaptation funding by 2035. The Guardian adds that it wants the UK government to base climate finance on grants rather than loans.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Leads on the profit side: the wealthy gain a "double dividend" from polluting industries and from the adaptation and rebuilding economy, with a motive to delay climate action.
Emphasis
The index of 217 companies, BlackRock and Vanguard holdings, food-trader profits, and the claim that the wealthy deliberately shape outcomes.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report the $53 trillion damage projection, the 20% share of warming since 1990, or the COP31 asks.
Charged language
“double dividend”“pretty damning”“turning chaos into profit”
For example
“This gives the planet’s wealthiest and most powerful people a “double dividend” from the climate crisis” — The Guardian

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Leads on the emissions inequality statistics, then Oxfam's argument that the super-rich also profit from disasters.
Emphasis
Emissions shares, health and economic damage projections, displacement of up to 1 billion people by 2050, and the COP31 policy asks.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the destroy and rebuild index, the adaptation market size or the named asset managers.
Charged language
“crime of extreme inequality”“setting the planet on fire”
For example
““The ultra-rich are setting the planet on fire and then charging the rest of us for the extinguishers,” Behar said” — Anadolu Agency

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…