Skip to content
Bramble

Crime

Court of Appeal increases minimum terms for parents who murdered baby Miguel Pirjani

The Court of Appeal has raised the minimum jail terms of Klevi and Nivalda Pirjani, from Wirral, for murdering their 13-week-old son Miguel in 2024, after the Attorney General referred the sentences as unduly lenient.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: BBC News
Image: Daily Mirror

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The Court of Appeal has increased the minimum jail terms of Klevi Pirjani, 38, and Nivalda Pirjani, 35, from Wirral, Merseyside, for murdering their 13-week-old son Miguel. Centre · 1They had originally been given minimum terms of 19 years (Klevi) and 15 years (Nivalda); the BBC reports the new terms as 21 years and six months for Klevi Pirjani and 17 years and nine months for Nivalda Pirjani. Left · 1The Daily Mirror says both minimum terms rose by two and a half years, though 15 to 17 years and nine months is an increase of two years and nine months, and it lists the new terms in the order 17 years and 9 months, then 21 years and 6 months.

Mixed · 2Attorney General Ellie Reeves referred the sentences to the Court of Appeal under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme, and government barristers argued the original sentences did not "meet the justice of this terrible case". Mixed · 2Lord Justice Jeremy Baker, sitting with Mr Justice Goose and Mr Justice Hilliard, said Miguel was subjected to "routine" assaults that grew in severity and ended in a "particularly callous" murder, and that the original terms "significantly underestimated the aggravating factors". Centre · 1Miguel was taken to Alder Hey children's hospital in November 2024 with severe head injuries and died five days later; the fatal assault was on 24 November 2024, at the family home in Percy Road, Seacombe.

Mixed · 2Paramedics arrived two minutes after the parents called 999 when Miguel suffered a cardiac arrest, and the Mirror says they restarted his heart, but he never regained consciousness. Mixed · 2Medical examination found 41 bone fractures across at least four separate incidents, including broken ribs, legs and a sternum (BBC) and injuries to the arm, collarbone and spine (Mirror). Mixed · 2It could not be established which parent inflicted the fatal violence, but prosecutors and the courts found each acted with the other's encouragement; at the original sentencing, Mr Justice Andrew Baker said the pair were "in this together, encouraging each other" and that who "fatally battered" Miguel "remains the guilty secret of a warped relationship".

Centre · 1Defence counsel opposed the increase: Rupert Bowers KC, for Nivalda Pirjani, accepted her sentence was lenient but said the sentencing judge "considered all of the factors", and Sarah Vine KC, for Klevi Pirjani, said it was "undoubtedly lenient, but not unduly". Left · 1Ellie Reeves said Miguel "was a defenceless baby" who suffered "appallingly cruel violence" from those who should have protected him, and welcomed the decision. Centre · 1The couple, watching from HMP Wakefield and HMP Styal respectively, showed no reaction as the sentences were increased.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Daily Mirror leads with the 'unduly lenient' increase and gives a narrative of Miguel's injuries and the Attorney General's reaction.
Emphasis
Miguel's injuries and suffering, the escalating abuse, and a full statement from Attorney General Ellie Reeves.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the defence barristers' arguments against the increase.
Charged language
“tot”“tragically”“callous”
For example
“The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP said: "Miguel Pirjani was a defenceless baby who had an entire life to live” — Daily Mirror
“The abuse continued and escalated over the following weeks” — Daily Mirror

Centre1 outlet

Framing
BBC News reports the appeal outcome in court-report style, setting out both sides' submissions.
Emphasis
The judges' reasoning, the prosecution case and the defence arguments that the sentences were lenient but not unduly so; the parents' lack of reaction.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not carry a statement from the Attorney General.
Charged language
“fatally battered”“unduly lenient”
For example
“said her client's sentence was "undoubtedly lenient, but not unduly, and leniency in itself is not a vice"” — BBC News
“showed no reaction as their sentences were increased” — BBC News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…