Skip to content
Bramble

Entertainment

Paris Jackson asks court to cut Michael Jackson estate executors' fee; estate calls motion meritless

Paris Jackson has asked a Los Angeles court to cut the compensation of Michael Jackson estate executor John Branca over late accountings. The estate says the motion is without merit and that executors take no compensation.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Deadline
Image: Daily Mail

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Paris Jackson, 28, filed a motion in Los Angeles Superior Court on October 23 asking the court to reduce the compensation of the Michael Jackson estate's co-executors, saying John Branca missed deadlines for filing financial accountings for 2023 and 2024. Centre · 1Her lawyers say Branca violated the court's April 24, 2026 order by missing a deadline he chose himself and then extended, and filed incomplete documents as accounts current for 2023 and 2024. They describe the 2024 filing as "nothing more than a placeholder". Mixed · 2She asks that the compensation for 2023, 2024 and each later year, until a complete 2026 account is filed, be cut by five percentage points, from 15% to 10% of gross entertainment-related income. She also asks the court to award her attorneys' fees and costs.

Mixed · 2The filing points out that Branca's documents request approval of more than $100 million in compensation for the co-executors and the Ziffren law firm. The Daily Mail gives the figure as $109,219,648.27 for the two years, covering Branca, the late co-executor John McClain and the firm. Mixed · 2The filing says "the gap between executor’s level of compensation and his persistent incompetence is intolerable", and that Branca has shown a "longstanding refusal, for the better part of a decade, to prioritize timely and complete reporting". A spokesperson for Paris Jackson said, "Enough of the smoke and mirrors", and argued that a fee cut is the only way to enforce the timeline Branca agreed to. Mixed · 2The estate's spokesperson said the motion is "completely without merit" and not argued on facts. The spokesperson said the executors waived executor compensation from the start and have never taken any, and are instead paid a separate, court-ordered management fee for running the Michael Jackson business.

Right · 1The estate also called it "nonsensical" that the motion seeks penalties over the 2023 and 2024 accountings, which it says have already been filed. It said the 2025 and 2026 accountings are not due for another six and 14 months, respectively. Centre · 1A hearing before retired Judge Mitchell Beckloff is scheduled for December 4. Deadline describes the dispute as a long-running fight in which Paris Jackson has demanded a closer look at the books, with some wins and losses, and says she has reportedly received about $65 million from the estate. Right · 1The Daily Mail adds that Branca's team has previously said the estate went from $500 million in debt to being worth more than $2 billion under his management.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Deadline presents the case as another round in a long, bitter Jackson family and estate feud, in a wry, colourful tone. It leads with Paris Jackson's "smoke and mirrors" line and the estate's rejection.
Emphasis
Quotes the filing's language on defective accountings and the $100 million request. Gives background on her reported $65 million from the estate, the film reshoots and the Chandler settlement, and her aim of controlling the estate.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the exact $109 million figure or the estate's claim that its value rose from $500 million in debt to over $2 billion.
Charged language
“Smoke & Mirrors”“Trashes”“nonsensical”“de facto Jackson civil war”
For example
“Calling the assertions and the demands for financial consequences “nonsensical,” the flush Michael Jackson Estate once again wants the deceased superstar’s daughter to beat it” — Deadline
“don’t for one second think this de facto Jackson civil war is anywhere near over” — Deadline

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Daily Mail presents the filing as a straightforward claim against Branca, led by the "persistent incompetence" quote. The paper frames it as what Paris's lawyers "claimed". It follows with a long background on Michael Jackson's death and career.
Emphasis
Gives the precise $109,219,648.27 figure and the filing's wording on mismanagement. Also includes the estate's response and Branca's team's claim that the estate rose from $500 million in debt to over $2 billion.
Leaves out or plays down
Leaves out the December 4 hearing date, the judge, and the wider history of disputes over film costs and settlements.
Charged language
“persistent incompetence”“mismanagement”
For example
“'the gap between executor’s level of compensation and his persistent incompetence is intolerable.'” — Daily Mail
“Paris's legal team claimed in the filing that as Branca has missed 'concrete deadlines' set by the court” — Daily Mail

Ask about this story

Loading…