Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Two men seen near Harry and Meghan's children's school; Sussexes call it 'extraordinarily reckless'

Two men carrying backpacks were seen looking into the grounds of the school attended by Archie and Lilibet and are understood to be international photographers. A spokesman for the Sussexes called it an unacceptable intrusion into children's privacy.

13 outlets · 3L · 4C · 6R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 4). New coverage since the last version from ABC News (Australia), Arab News, Fox News, Hindustan Times, IJR, The Times of India. Previously: “Two men seen at Harry and Meghan's children's school; Sussexes call conduct 'reckless'”.

Image: BBC News
Image: Daily Mirror
Image: Daily Express
Image: The Times of India
Image: Metro
Image: Irish Independent
Image: ABC News (Australia)
Image: IJR

1 / 8

The story, neutrally told

Two young men carrying backpacks were seen by private security and school staff walking the perimeter of the school attended by Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, stopping to look into the grounds, according to the BBC and the Mirror. They returned to a van that police later established was a rental vehicle. The BBC says police identified one of them as an international press photographer, believed to work for a European press agency; the Mirror says officers determined both were international photographers.

Good Morning Britain, as reported by the Express, said police were investigating the men, who were believed to be paparazzi. A spokesman for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex called the photographers' conduct "extraordinarily reckless" and an "unacceptable intrusion into the privacy of children". The spokesman blamed "certain European paparazzi" and, in the Mirror's version, referred to the earlier incident at RAF Fairford, which the coverage does not explain; the spokesman also said British press had been broadly respectful.

The family returned to the UK at the end of August after six years in the US, and the children changed schools after a few days over security concerns about school-run traffic. The BBC reports that Ravec, the committee overseeing royal and VIP security, is to reconsider the couple's police protection now they are full-time residents. Reuters says the couple have their own security team but want government-provided police protection.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left3 outlets

Framing
Security-scare narrative with detail on the men, the van and the earlier school change; ABC (Reuters text) leads with the spokesperson's 'stalked' claim.
Emphasis
The men's movements, the rental van, the school-run problems.
Leaves out or plays down
Little on the Ravec review or on police protection debate in the Mirror.
Charged language
“security scare”“stalked”
For example
“Two young men carrying backpacks are understood to have been seen by both private security and school staff” — Daily Mirror
“Prince Harry's children have been stalked by "certain European paparazzi"” — ABC News (Australia)

Centre4 outlets

Framing
Reports the Sussexes' condemnation and police details, with context on security review; Indian outlets carry the spokesperson's claim with attribution.
Emphasis
The statement, Ravec review, family's return.
Leaves out or plays down
Indian outlets omit the police detail on the van and identification.
Charged language
“lashed out”“allegedly targeted”
For example
“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have lashed out at "extraordinarily reckless" photographers” — BBC News
“were allegedly targeted by “certain European paparazzi”” — The Times of India

Right6 outlets

Framing
Express leads with a TV report of police investigating and viewer anger over taxpayer-funded security; Reuters/PA copy carried by others is factual.
Emphasis
Police investigation, cost of protection, viewer reaction (Express).
Leaves out or plays down
Express omits the spokesman's statement.
Charged language
“security bombshell”“grifters”“surveilling”
For example
“The update left viewers fuming as they took to social media to voice their complaints.” — Daily Express
“have their own security team but want the British government to provide their family with automatic police protection” — The Straits Times