Policy Exchange report calls draft Conversion Practices Bill unworkable; Government rejects it
A Policy Exchange report by Akua Reindorf KC and Baroness Falkner says the draft Conversion Practices Bill is flawed and could criminalise parents. The Government calls the report misleading and says the Bill targets a specific form of abuse.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Policy Exchange, a think tank, has published a report on the Government's draft Conversion Practices Bill, which it describes as "ideological, authoritarian and unworkable" and "wholly unsuitable" for a democratic and pluralistic society. GB NewsR “the legislation is "ideological, authoritarian and unworkable"” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “brands the draft legislation 'ideological, authoritarian, unworkable and wholly unsuitable for a democratic and pluralistic society'” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2The report's author is the barrister Akua Reindorf KC, and Baroness Kishwer Falkner, a Policy Exchange Distinguished Fellow and former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is also named in the coverage. Sharron Davies, the former Olympic swimmer and campaigner, endorsed the findings. GB NewsR “Barrister Akua Reindorf KC, author of the report, and Policy Exchange Distinguished Fellow Baroness Kishwer Falkner”“endorsed by former Olympic swimmer and women’s rights campaigner Sharron Davies” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “Baroness Falkner, former Chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1The Bill aims to outlaw abusive attempts to change someone's sexuality or gender identity, with offenders facing up to five years in prison. GB NewsR “offenders facing up to five years in prison” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2The authors argue that parents could face up to five years in jail for refusing to finance a child's gender reassignment, or for trying "in good faith and with love and care" to stop a transition they fear could harm the child. GB NewsR “parents could face five years in prison for refusing to finance a child’s gender reassignment” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “for refusing to finance a child's gender reassignment or for trying in good faith and with love and care” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1GB News adds that, according to the report, complaints against parents could trigger safeguarding investigations even without criminal charges, and potentially child protection plans or care proceedings. It also notes that simply disagreeing with a child would not be a crime, and that prosecutors would have to prove abusive conduct intended to change someone's sexuality or transgender identity. GB NewsR “complaints against parents could trigger safeguarding investigations, even if no criminal charges followed”“Simply disagreeing with a child would not be a crime.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2The report also says that, because there is no minimum age for prosecution, primary school children could be liable for comments or questions made about classmates "without malice or harmful intent". Daily MailR “Because there is no minimum age for prosecution” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “children as young as 10, the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 1According to the Daily Mail, the report says the Bill's definition of transgender identity, which includes people who identify as "neither male nor female or as not solely male or female", is so broad that it could cover "catgender" people. It says a person "may face imprisonment for trying to persuade another that they are not, in fact, a cat". Daily MailR “a person may face imprisonment for trying to persuade another that they are not, in fact, a cat”“identifies as neither male nor female or as not solely male or female” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1The Daily Mail also reports that the study says the Bill breaches the right to a fair trial, would allow private prosecutions by activists, and rests on prevalence figures, such as a survey suggesting 30 per cent of transgender people had undergone exorcism, that it calls "wildly improbable". It notes that practices such as electric shock therapy and "corrective rape" are already unlawful. Daily MailR “will allow activists to bring private prosecutions against their opponents”“are 'wildly improbable'”“are already unlawful” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2Falkner said the draft Bill "appears oblivious to human rights law in Britain" and would be unworkable unless considerably revised and put to a full public consultation. Davies wrote that the Bill risks gender self-identification "by the back door". Daily MailR “This draft bill appears oblivious to human rights law in Britain.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “Ms Davies warned that the legislation could effectively introduce gender self-identification "by the back door"” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 1A Government spokesman said the report was "misleading and based on a number of inaccurate claims" and that the Bill targets a specific form of abuse and "does not touch regular parenting". Unnamed sources called the claim about cats "nonsense" and said the Bill defines no new genders in law. Daily MailR “This report is misleading and based on a number of inaccurate claims.”“Sources added that the claim about cats was 'nonsense'” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1Equalities minister Simon Lightwood said in a parliamentary answer on 29 October that the Bill "will not prevent parents from making choices on how to raise their children". Ministers say it is meant to close gaps in existing law, particularly around psychological abuse. The draft Bill is undergoing parliamentary scrutiny and is not yet law. GB NewsR “The draft Bill will not prevent parents from making choices on how to raise their children.”“The draft Bill is undergoing parliamentary scrutiny and has not yet become law.” Read at GB News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets lead with the report's warnings about the Bill's reach, GB News on parents facing prison and the Daily Mail on the 'catgender' example, and present the Bill as Labour's overreach.
- Emphasis
- Risks to parents, children and free speech; the report's strongest language and examples. The Government response comes lower down.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither carries independent legal views or a supporter of the Bill. GB News does not mention the Government's 'misleading' rebuttal or its 'nonsense' reply on the cat claim. The Daily Mail does not repeat that mere disagreement is not a crime and that prosecutors must prove abusive intent.
- Charged language
- “Jail threat”“Absurdity of Labour's 'unworkable' gay and trans Bill”“damning assessment”“extraordinary prospect”
- For example
-
“Parents could face prison for opposing child's gender transition under draft Bill, report warns” — GB News
“Jail threat if you insist a human can't be a cat: Absurdity of Labour's 'unworkable' gay and trans Bill” — Daily Mail
“according to the damning assessment of Labour's Conversion Practices Bill” — Daily Mail
What every side reports
- Policy Exchange published a report critical of the draft Conversion Practices Bill.
- The Bill carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
- The Government rejects the claim that ordinary parenting would be criminalised.
- The draft Bill is still under parliamentary scrutiny.
Where accounts differ
-
point
- Left
- left
- Centre
- centre
- Right
- right
Policy Exchange organisation
Through its report, the think tank says the draft Bill is of "exceptionally low quality" and that a competent legislature would not enact it.
“The draft Bill is a piece of proposed legislation of exceptionally low quality.” — GB News
Akua Reindorf person
As author of the report, Reindorf and co-authors argue the Bill would criminalise parents who seek to dissuade children from transitioning and legislate gender self-ID into law.
“criminalise parents who seek to dissuade children from transitioning” — GB News
Conversion Practices Bill law
The Government says the draft Bill closes gaps in criminal law on a specific, severe form of abuse and does not touch regular parenting. It rejects the report as misleading.
“it does not touch regular parenting” — Daily Mail
“We are preventing a very specific, severe form of abuse.” — GB News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
GB NewsR ·
Parents could face prison for opposing child's gender transition under draft Bill, report warns
Critical Leads with the report's warning that parents could be jailed, quoting the authors at length, then gives the minister's rebuttal and the prosecution threshold near the end.

-
Critical Uses the 'catgender' example as a headline-level illustration of absurdity and quotes the report and Falkner heavily, with a Government rebuttal at the end.

- 2 Nov 22:00 First GB NewsR Parents could face prison for opposing child's gender transition under draft Bill, report warns
- 3 Nov 08:08 +10h 9m Daily MailR Jail threat if you insist a human can't be a cat: Absurdity of Labour's 'unworkable' gay and trans Bill
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…