Skip to content
Bramble

World

Latinobarometro poll: 65% in Latin America see China's influence as positive, 57% the US's

The 2026 Latinobarometro survey, published on 2 October, found Latin Americans rate China's influence more positively than America's for the first time since 1995. The US remains more popular than China in overall favourability.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Straits Times
Image: Al Jazeera

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The 2026 Latinobarometro survey, published on 2 October, found that China is seen as a more positive influence than the United States in Latin America, the first time this has happened since the annual poll began in 1995. Left · 1Some 65% of respondents in 17 countries called China a positive influence, against 57% for the US. Mixed · 2China's figure was up from 48% in 2020, while the US figure fell from 60% over the same period.

Mixed · 2Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic were the only countries where US influence was rated more positively than China's. Mixed · 2On overall favourability the US still led China, 63% to 58%, but the US figure was down from 73% in 2024. Mixed · 2Both outlets place the findings in the context of President Donald Trump's second term and his "Donroe Doctrine" of asserting US dominance in Latin America.

Left · 1Al Jazeera adds that the administration has struck alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, which rights groups have decried as extrajudicial killings. Mixed · 2The survey also asked about the US capture of Venezuela's president Nicolas Maduro: a majority in every country except Argentina approved. Mixed · 2Opinion was split on the effect on Venezuela, with 35% saying it benefited the country and 28% saying it harmed it, and Venezuelans were among those most positive about US influence.

Mixed · 2Latinobarometro is a Chile-based non-profit; the poll rests on about 19,200 face-to-face interviews in 17 countries between 7 May and 17 June, with a 1% margin of error.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Leads on the poll result, then ties it to the Trump administration's military actions in the region, including boat strikes criticised by rights groups.
Emphasis
US military force and rights-group criticism as context for declining US standing.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote the report's own conclusion that China has more influence than the US.
Charged language
“abducting”“extrajudicial killings”
For example
“which rights groups have decried as extrajudicial killings” — Al Jazeera
“abducting Venezuela’s then-leader Nicolas Maduro in Brazil” — Al Jazeera

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
AFP wire copy carried by the Straits Times; frames the result as growing disaffection with the US under Trump's openly asserted hegemony.
Emphasis
Trump's 'Donroe Doctrine' and the explanation of its Monroe origin; the report's conclusion that China has more influence.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the boat strikes or rights-group criticism.
Charged language
“hegemony”“overthrew”“Donroe Doctrine”
For example
“Trump’s push to restore US dominance in what Washington calls “our hemisphere” was in evidence in January when the United States overthrew Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro.” — The Straits Times