Rep. Andy Harris tells reporters not to record him after debate with Dan Schwartz in Cambridge, Md.
After a Tuesday debate against Democratic challenger Dan Schwartz, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) told reporters they could not record him, citing Maryland's two-party consent law, and called for an officer. Outlets and legal sources say the law does not clearly apply to a public setting like this.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) told reporters at a post-debate press gathering in Cambridge, Maryland, on Tuesday night that they were not allowed to record him, threatened to refer them to a prosecutor, and asked for an officer to be brought in. Raw StoryL “threatening to refer them to a prosecutor for recording him and demanding that someone “get an officer in here.”” Read at Raw Story ↗ Washington ExaminerR “telling the journalist she could not record him during a press gaggle.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2The exchange followed a debate between Harris and his Democratic challenger Dan Schwartz in the race for Maryland's 1st Congressional District, moderated by the League of Women Voters; The Baltimore Banner published video of the confrontation. Washington ExaminerR “moderated by the League of Women Voters in Cambridge, Maryland” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Raw StoryL “according to a video The Baltimore Banner posted Wednesday.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Mixed · 2During the debate, while explaining rising fuel prices, Harris said Democrats' environmental regulations were responsible before an audience member's laughter interrupted him; he told her to let him finish and called her rude. Washington ExaminerR “Harris told the woman in the audience to let him finish his sentence and added, “You are rude.”” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Raw StoryL ““You should let me finish the sentence, ma’am. You are rude!”” Read at Raw Story ↗
Right · 1The moderator then asked both candidates to make sure their supporters were civil, and Schwartz told his supporters it was important that the audience could hear both candidates, according to Maryland Matters as cited by the Washington Examiner. Washington ExaminerR “The debate moderator then asked the two candidates to ensure their supporters in the audience were civil during the debate, according to Maryland Matters.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2In the video, Harris told a reporter, "You do not have my permission to record," saying Maryland is a "two-party state"; the reporter replied that everyone in the room was recording. The Washington Examiner identifies her as Cat Murphy of the Capital News Service. Raw StoryL ““Everyone in here is recording,” the reporter replied.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Harris told a reporter for the Capital News Service during the gaggle” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Another reporter said it was a public forum; Harris asked whether the reporters knew the law and said that as a legislator he knows it well. Raw Story reports he also told others to "take her camera" and said audio and video need two-party approval in Maryland. Raw StoryL ““You’re going to have to take her camera!” Harris shouted.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Other journalists at the gaggle chimed in to support Murphy, with another reporter saying to Harris, “With due respect, this is a public forum.”” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Mixed · 2Reporters pressed him on his reported remarks about the war in Iran and on the First Amendment, and Raw Story says he told the others as he walked away that the reporter was "ruining all your chances to get an answer." Raw StoryL ““She’s ruining all your chances to get an answer about anything,” Harris told the other reporters as he walked away.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Murphy continued to attempt to ask Harris about the war in Iran” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Maryland's wiretap law requires consent of all parties to record a conversation, but Raw Story cites a 2011 legislative analysis noting a judge threw out 2010 charges against a motorcyclist who recorded a traffic stop in full public view, and says the Banner judged Harris wrong. The Washington Examiner cites the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press as saying the law applies to private, in-person conversations. Raw StoryL “The Banner said Harris was wrong to tell the reporter they were breaking the law.” Read at Raw Story ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Maryland’s law on two-party recording consent applies to private, in-person conversations” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Harris, an eight-term incumbent who chairs the House Freedom Caucus, won in 2024 by more than 22 points in a seat Cook Political Report rates Solid Republican; the Examiner said it had asked his campaign for comment. Washington ExaminerR “The eight-term incumbent won his last election in 2024 by over 22 percentage points”“The Washington Examiner has reached out to Harris’s campaign for comment.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Raw StoryL “Harris, who chairs the House Freedom Caucus” Read at Raw Story ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Presents the episode as a 'meltdown' following a 'disastrous debate', centring Harris's behaviour and his legal error.
- Emphasis
- Harris's verbatim outbursts, threats to involve a prosecutor, and the Banner's finding that he was wrong on the law.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not name the reporter or the outlet she works for, nor mention the moderator's civility request or Harris's electoral standing.
- Charged language
- “melts down”“disastrous debate”“lashed out”
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Reports the confrontation as a clash with a named reporter, tied to voters laughing at Harris's energy-cost claim; more measured, adds electoral context.
- Emphasis
- The named reporter, the moderator's civility request, the Reporters Committee's reading of the law, and Harris's safe-seat status.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits Harris's 'take her camera' remark and his closing 'thank her profusely' jab, and the 2010 court case; notes the campaign had not yet commented.
- Charged language
- “lashes out”“railed against”
- For example
-
“Andy Harris lashes out at reporter after voters laugh at his blaming of Democrats for energy costs” — Washington Examiner
“Harris’s seat is listed as a Solid Republican seat by the Cook Political Report.” — Washington Examiner
What every side reports
- The confrontation took place Tuesday night in Cambridge, Maryland, after Harris's debate with Dan Schwartz.
- The Baltimore Banner published video of it.
- Harris told a reporter she could not record him, threatened a prosecutor referral and asked for an officer.
- An audience member laughed during Harris's answer on fuel prices and he called her rude.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether recording Harris at the press event was illegal
- Left
- Raw Story says the Banner found Harris wrong and cites a court dismissing a public-recording case.
- Right
- The Examiner cites the Reporters Committee saying the two-party law covers private, in-person conversations.
Andy Harris person
Harris insisted that recording him without permission broke Maryland's two-party law, asked for an officer, and said he knows the law as a legislator; his campaign had not commented to the Examiner.
““Audio and video have to have two-party approval in Maryland,” Harris insisted.” — Raw Story
“The Washington Examiner has reached out to Harris’s campaign for comment.” — Washington Examiner
Dan Schwartz person
Schwartz, the Democratic challenger, asked his supporters in the audience to let voters hear both candidates.
““It’s very important that you guys are able to hear from both of us tonight,” Schwartz said to his supporters in the audience.” — Washington Examiner
The Baltimore Banner organisation
The Baltimore Banner posted the video and, per Raw Story, said Harris was wrong to say reporters were breaking the law.
“The Banner said Harris was wrong to tell the reporter they were breaking the law.” — Raw Story
Left2 articles
-
'Get an officer!' GOP lawmaker melts down at questions over disastrous debate
Critical Portrays Harris as having a 'meltdown', quoting him at length and noting the Banner's view that he misstated the law.
-
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Andy Harris lashes out at reporter after voters laugh at his blaming of Democrats for energy costs
Mixed Critical of Harris's behaviour in its headline but more restrained in tone, with legal and electoral context and a request for campaign comment.
- 14 Oct 17:12 First Raw StoryL 'Get an officer!' GOP lawmaker melts down at questions over disastrous debate
- 14 Oct 17:34 +23m Washington ExaminerR Andy Harris lashes out at reporter after voters laugh at his blaming of Democrats for energy costs
- 14 Oct 18:44 +1h 32m Raw StoryL 'Hell of a strategy': MS NOW panel ridicules GOP lawmaker's meltdown on laughing crowd
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…