Research: bots made 76% of responses to 2023 UK vape consultation
A study in Tobacco Control says 90,835 of 118,756 responses to the 2023 UK consultation on a smoke-free generation and disposable vapes were bot-generated. The Department of Health and Social Care excluded them from its decision-making.
1 / 4
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Research published on 27 October 2026 in the journal Tobacco Control says that about three-quarters of responses to the UK government's 2023 consultation on smoking and vaping laws were generated by bots. The GuardianLC “Three-quarters of all the responses to the 2023 consultation on the tobacco and vapes bill were machine-generated” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “Three out of every four responses to a Government consultation on smoking and vaping laws were submitted by bots, a new study has revealed.” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) identified 90,835 of the 118,756 responses it received, or 76%, as bot-submitted. The GuardianLC “90,835 of the 118,756 responses it received, 76%, were submitted by bots” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “Of the 118,756 submissions received, DHSC officials identified 90,835 — 76 per cent — as fraudulent.” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2The responses were often duplicated many times and sent at high frequency from a small number of IP addresses. Nearly all answered the same question, opposing restrictions on disposable vapes. The GuardianLC “often duplicated many times and sent at high frequency from a small number of IP addresses” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “all the bot-generated responses targeted a multiple-choice question opposing restrictions on disposable vapes” Read at GB News ↗
Mixed · 2The study's authors are the health policy experts Dr Nason Maani of the University of Edinburgh and Prof Anna Gilmore of the University of Bath, according to the Guardian. GB News attributes the work to researchers at the University of Edinburgh, who used published government reports and Freedom of Information responses from the DHSC. The GuardianLC “Dr Nason Maani, from the University of Edinburgh, and Prof Anna Gilmore, of the University of Bath” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “analysed published Government reports and information obtained through Freedom of Information requests” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2The researchers call it the first documented instance of large-scale automated interference in a formal public health policy consultation. The Guardian adds that it is thought to be the first coordinated attempt to use AI to derail UK health policymaking. The GuardianLC “appears to be the first documented instance of large-scale automated interference in a formal public health policy consultation” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “This appears to be the first documented instance of large-scale, automated interference in a formal public health policy consultation.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1The researchers said the scale and consistency of the submissions suggested a coordinated campaign. They stressed they could not establish who organised it, why, or whether commercial interests were involved, and could not independently verify the government's bot-detection methods. This detail appears in GB News. GB NewsR “they stressed they could not establish who organised the submissions, their intentions or whether commercial interests were involved.”“They also acknowledged they could not independently verify the Government's bot-detection methods.” Read at GB News ↗
Mixed · 2The DHSC excluded the automated responses from its decision-making. GB News reports that almost eight in ten valid respondents then backed restrictions. The GuardianLC “The DHSC excluded the 90,835 automated responses from its decision-making.” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “almost eight in ten valid respondents backed restrictions” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2Keir Starmer's Labour government inherited the bill from Rishi Sunak's Conservative government in 2024 and passed it. GB News says the Tobacco and Vapes Act received Royal Assent in April, that a disposable vape ban came into force in June 2025, and that the tobacco sales ban for anyone born on or after 1 January 2009 starts from January next year. The GuardianLC “Keir Starmer’s Labour government inherited the tobacco and vapes bill in 2024 and passed it into law” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “A separate ban on disposable vapes came into force in June 2025” Read at GB News ↗ Mixed · 2A DHSC spokesperson said its controls to prevent manipulation of consultations "worked effectively in this case", that the fake responses were removed, and that the department will stay alert to such interference. The GuardianLC “those controls worked effectively in this case.” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “We will remain alert to interference of this kind in future consultation processes” Read at GB News ↗
Mixed · 2Maani warned that future campaigns may be harder to catch and could make "a handful of powerful interests" look like a mass movement. The researchers' paper stresses the need for better detection, especially where screening is weak. The GuardianLC “the threat is that future campaigns become harder to catch” Read at The Guardian ↗ GB NewsR “strengthening detection capacity and governance safeguards will be essential” Read at GB News ↗ Left · 1The Guardian quotes Caroline Cerny of Action on Smoking and Health, who cited the tobacco industry's history of undermining public health regulation. It also quotes Azzurra Moores of Demos, who called the findings "pretty alarming" and said there is no single fix. The GuardianLC “Given the tobacco industry’s history of seeking to undermine public health regulation”“These findings are pretty alarming” Read at The Guardian ↗ Right · 1GB News compares the case with a US scandal in which investigators found nearly 18 million of 22 million responses to a 2017 internet regulation consultation were fake. New York Attorney General Letitia James reported this in 2021. GB NewsR “nearly 18 million of 22 million responses to a 2017 consultation on internet regulation were fake” Read at GB News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- The Guardian leads with AI bots 'flooding' the consultation in a 'failed attempt' to stop the ban, and treats it as a threat to policymaking and trust.
- Emphasis
- Expert and campaigner alarm (ASH, Demos), the tobacco industry's history, and the risk of future undetected campaigns.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention that the researchers could not identify who was behind the campaign or verify the DHSC's detection methods, or the share of valid respondents backing restrictions.
- Charged language
- “flooded”“swamp”“pretty alarming”
- For example
-
“AI bots flooded a government consultation with tens of thousands of fake responses in a failed attempt to stop the UK’s ban on disposable vapes.” — The Guardian
“Evidence that AI bots have been used to swamp a Department of Health consultation is deeply concerning.” — The Guardian
Centre1 outlet
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- GB News presents the study as a factual finding on bogus submissions and stresses the limits of what is known, with a US precedent for context.
- Emphasis
- The researchers' caveats about not knowing who organised the submissions or whether commercial interests were involved, and that almost eight in ten valid respondents backed restrictions.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not carry the ASH or Demos comments, and does not name the Bath co-author.
- Charged language
- “bogus”“fraudulent”“scandal”
What every side reports
- Bots accounted for 90,835 of 118,756 responses (76%) to the 2023 consultation.
- The bot responses were duplicated and sent from a small number of IP addresses.
- The DHSC excluded the bot responses.
- The researchers call it the first documented instance of large-scale automated interference in a public health consultation.
- A DHSC spokesperson said its controls worked effectively.
Where accounts differ
-
Who is behind the bots and whether the tobacco industry is implicated
- Left
- The Guardian quotes ASH pointing to the tobacco industry's history, and Maani on 'powerful interests', without identifying a culprit.
- Right
- GB News says the researchers could not establish who organised the submissions or whether commercial interests were involved.
-
Whether the bots used AI
- Left
- The Guardian describes the responses as AI-generated and 'machine-generated'.
- Right
- GB News says 'bots' and 'automated' without mentioning AI.
-
DHSC identified 90,835 of 118,756 consultation responses (76%) as bot-submitted.
Reported- Supports 1
- The Guardian
- Reports 3
- Daily Mirror, Evening Standard, GB News
Disposable vape ban topic
The DHSC says its controls worked, the fake responses were removed, and the consultation informed its smoke-free generation policy. The researchers say the bots opposed the disposable vape ban.
“those controls worked effectively in this case.” — The Guardian
“More than 90,000 bogus submissions opposed plans to restrict disposable vapes” — GB News
Artificial intelligence topic
The Guardian frames AI as making fake responses harder to spot. Demos says it makes fake responses 'far harder to spot'.
“AI makes fake responses far harder to spot.” — The Guardian
Left2 articles
-
AI bots flooded 2023 UK government consultation on disposable vapes ban
Alarmist Presents the bot flood as a serious threat to consultations, with expert warnings.

-

Centre1 article
Right1 article
-
GB NewsR ·
New study reveals 75% of respondents to Government's smoking and vaping laws consultation were bots
Neutral Reports the study with its caveats and the 'eight in ten' valid support, adding a US comparison.

- 27 Oct 22:30 First The GuardianLC AI bots flooded 2023 UK government consultation on disposable vapes ban
- 27 Oct 23:30 +59m Evening StandardN Majority of responses to consultation on smoking Bill ‘generated by AI bots’
- 27 Oct 23:31 +1h GB NewsR New study reveals 75% of respondents to Government's smoking and vaping laws consultation were bots
- 28 Oct 00:12 +1h 42m Daily MirrorL AI robots 'hijacked Government consultation on laws to curb vape sales'
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…
