Researchers drill over 60 feet at Turkey's Durupınar site, await lab results on 'Noah's Ark' theory
The Noah's Ark Research Project says it drilled to about 20 metres at the Durupınar site and found mainly soil rather than solid rock. Lab tests on 300-plus samples are due this winter, and geologists have long called the formation natural.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2The Noah's Ark Research Project has finished its first full field season at the Durupınar site near Mount Ararat in eastern Turkey, drilling more than 60 feet (20 metres) beneath the boat-shaped formation. Fox NewsR “drilling more than 60 feet beneath the site and collecting hundreds of samples now undergoing laboratory analysis” Read at Fox News ↗ BreitbartR “they have been able to go down more than 60 feet to collect samples” Read at Breitbart ↗ Right · 1The project, supported by Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, collected over 300 soil samples from varying depths inside and outside the formation, according to its vice president, Andrew Jones. He said deep-core drilling was used at the site for the first time. Fox NewsR “researchers collected over 300 soil samples from varying depths inside and outside the formation, Noah's Ark Research Project vice president Andrew Jones told Fox News Digital” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1Jones said the drilling did not hit a solid block of limestone or other rock, only mainly soil, though boulders were found in some places. He said this should give sceptics pause when they call the site a rock formation, but added that the team is still studying its results. Fox NewsR “we did not encounter any solid block of rock, of limestone, [or] of any type of a rock," Jones said. "We were hitting mainly soil."” Read at Fox News ↗
Right · 1The decision to drill deeper followed 2024 sampling that Jones said showed three times more organic matter inside the site than outside, 38% more potassium, and differences in pH. Fox NewsR “contained three times more organic matter inside the site, along with 38% more potassium and differences in pH” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 2Samples from inside the formation have gone to laboratories, and testing this winter will look for signs of human activity or material suggesting decayed wood. No such evidence has been reported yet. Fox NewsR “"That's what we'll be testing this winter," Jones said. "Just to see if we can find any type of manmade activity or something that suggests decayed wood."” Read at Fox News ↗ BreitbartR ““That’s what we’ll be testing this winter. Just to see if we can find any type of man-made activity or something that suggests decayed wood,”” Read at Breitbart ↗ Right · 1The formation was first identified in 1959. In a 1996 paper, geologists Lorence Gene Collins and David Franklin Fasold concluded it was "a natural rock structure", and geologists have generally argued it is natural. Fox NewsR “In a 1996 paper, geologists Lorence Gene Collins and David Franklin Fasold rejected claims that the formation was Noah's Ark, concluding instead that it was "a natural rock structure."” Read at Fox News ↗
Right · 1Jones said pottery found beside the formation, not within it, was tentatively dated by style from the early Chalcolithic (Copper Age) to the Iron Age. He noted two ancient settlements nearby, one unexcavated, and said "You can connect the dots" if the site were the Ark. He identified himself as a Christian who believes the biblical story, urged people not to jump to conclusions, and said the team still has "a lot of work to do." Fox NewsR “Jones, however, clarified that the pottery was found beside the formation, not within it.”“"You can connect the dots," Jones said” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 1Separately, Ken Ham, founder of Kentucky's Ark Encounter and Answers in Genesis, urged caution about claims that the ark has been found, made by the American company Noah's Ark Scans. Breitbart, citing World, said Ham warned that Christians risk their credibility by exaggerating evidence, and said "Let's see the actual data." BreitbartR “Ham urged caution amid those claims, made by Noah’s Ark Scans, an American Christian research company, arguing that Christians risked their own credibility when they exaggerated evidence”““Let’s see the actual data. After all, good science welcomes careful investigation,”” Read at Breitbart ↗ Right · 1No conclusive proof of Noah's Ark has been established, and earlier claimed finds have met scepticism and lacked rigorous scientific validation. BreitbartR “no conclusive proof of Noah’s ark has been established” Read at Breitbart ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present the project's drilling as a fresh step in the search for Noah's Ark, relying mainly on the project's vice president. Fox leads with the finding of no solid rock; Breitbart, a short video-led item, leads with deep-core drilling and the hundreds of samples and cites Fox.
- Emphasis
- Fox stresses the lack of solid rock, the soil differences and that lab work is pending. Breitbart adds Ken Ham's call for caution and Answers in Genesis's account of the ark.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither quotes an independent geologist responding to the new drilling claims. Breitbart omits the no-solid-rock claim and the soil figures.
- Charged language
- “Noah's Ark mystery”“the search for Noah's Ark”
What every side reports
- The Noah's Ark Research Project used deep-core drilling at the Durupınar site for the first time and reached more than 60 feet.
- Hundreds of samples are in laboratory analysis, with testing this winter.
- Some geologists argue the formation is natural.
- The researchers are looking for signs of human activity or decayed wood.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the drilling undermines the view that the formation is natural rock
- Right
- Fox News relays Jones's view that finding mainly soil and no solid rock block should give sceptics pause; Breitbart repeats that geologists consider it natural without endorsing either view, and adds Ken Ham's call for caution.
Durupınar site place
Project representatives call it a boat-shaped formation near Mount Ararat that they are testing for signs of human activity or decayed wood. Geologists have argued it is natural.
“geologists have argued it is a natural formation” — Fox News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Noah's Ark mystery enters new phase as researchers probe deep beneath site
Neutral Interview-driven report that relays project claims alongside the geologists' natural-formation view and Jones's caveats.

-
VIDEO: Researchers Use Deep-Core Drilling in Search for Noah's Ark
Sympathetic Brief video-led item summarising Fox's report, adding Ken Ham's caution and Answers in Genesis's biblical background.

- 2 Oct 13:00 First Fox NewsR Noah's Ark mystery enters new phase as researchers probe deep beneath site
- 2 Oct 23:05 +10h 5m BreitbartR VIDEO: Researchers Use Deep-Core Drilling in Search for Noah's Ark
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.