2026 iPad Mini reviewed: OLED, IP67 and A20 Pro, but a $699 starting price
The Verge and Wired both review Apple's 2026 iPad Mini, praising its OLED screen, faster chip and water resistance. Both criticise the higher price, which starts at $699.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2Apple's 2026 iPad Mini has an 8.5-inch OLED display in place of the previous 8.3-inch LCD, and the Verge and Wired both reviewed it positively. The VergeLC “It now measures 8.5 inches instead of 8.3, and it’s now a 2316 x 1512 OLED panel instead of an LCD.” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “The star attraction of the new iPad Mini is its 8.5-inch display.” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 2Both reviewers say the display lacks the 120Hz refresh rate found on other recent Apple devices. The Verge's David Pierce calls the omission of ProMotion an odd choice and says he notices the difference with the Apple Pencil, scrolling and games. Wired's Luke Larsen notes the missing 120Hz and says the screen is less bright than the iPad Pro's, at 600 nits in SDR and 1,200 nits in HDR. The VergeLC “which has a refresh rate capped at 60Hz rather than the 120Hz you’ll get on most other recent Apple devices” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “It can reach 600 nits in SDR and 1,200 nits in HDR, which is 400 nits less than the iPad Pro.” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 2The Mini is the first iPad with an IP67 rating. Wired describes this as handling submersion for 30 minutes in about three feet of water. To achieve the rating Apple removed the speaker holes and introduced what it calls an Acoustic Display, which fires sound from the front panel. WiredLC “the IP67 rating means it can handle submersion for 30 minutes in about three feet of water” Read at Wired ↗ The VergeLC “like ditching the speaker holes and opting for what it calls an Acoustic Display” Read at The Verge ↗
Left · 2The Mini uses Apple's A20 Pro chip. The Verge measures it at about 50 percent faster than the 2024 Mini for standard computing and about three times as fast for graphics. Wired says the iPad Mini plays games such as Fortnite and Assassin's Creed Mirage smoothly at 60 frames per second, with textures and effects turned down. The VergeLC “benchmarks about 50 percent faster than the 2024 Mini for standard computing tasks, and about three times as fast for graphics-intensive ones” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “the iPad Mini played them smoothly at 60 frames per second” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 2Wired reports that all models have 12GB of memory, four more than the previous Mini. It also says only the 512GB model gets the full six-core CPU and dual Neural Engines. The Verge's review unit had one more CPU core than the cheaper models. WiredLC “All come with 12 GB of unified memory, four more than the previous iPad Mini”“Only the 512-GB model gets the full six-core CPU and dual 16-core Neural Engines.” Read at Wired ↗ The VergeLC “The chip in my review unit has one more CPU core than the A20 Pro in the cheaper Minis” Read at The Verge ↗ Left · 2The front camera has moved to the landscape side of the device. Both reviewers note that the Mini still has Touch ID and no Face ID. The VergeLC “it’s still TouchID or nothing on the Mini” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “One thing the iPad Mini is still missing is Face ID.” Read at Wired ↗
Left · 2Both reviewers have reservations about the price. The Verge says the cheapest version, with Wi-Fi, 128GB and a regular OLED display, starts at $699, the highest starting price ever for a Mini. It says the 512GB cellular unit with nano-texture it tested costs $1,249, and that it cannot in good conscience tell readers to buy it. Wired says the previous Mini cost $499 at launch and that $699 is harder to justify. It puts the most powerful model with nano-texture at $1,099. The VergeLC “starts at $699, by a wide margin the highest starting price ever for a Mini”“The one in my hands also costs $1,249, and I cannot in good conscience tell you to buy it.” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “The previous iPad Mini cost $499 when it came out (before the price increases)” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 2The reviewers differ on nano-texture, the matte display option that costs $100 more. Wired calls it totally worth the extra cost. The Verge praises its glare reduction but says it dulls the screen slightly and advises readers not to spend the money. WiredLC “a nano-texture display, which is totally worth the extra $100 it costs” Read at Wired ↗ The VergeLC “Spend the extra money on the cellular version or, better yet, don’t spend it at all.” Read at The Verge ↗ Left · 2Their verdicts on the target buyer also differ. The Verge says people who already love the Mini and can afford it get the best Mini in years, and that others should look at other iPads. It sees the ideal user as someone using it in the field. Wired says it loves the tablet but asks who it is for among the other iPads. The VergeLC “But if you’re an iPad Mini Person and you can stomach the price? You’re getting the best Mini in years.” Read at The Verge ↗ WiredLC “I’ll come straight out with it: I love this little tablet.” Read at Wired ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both reviews call the iPad Mini the best yet and then question the higher price. The Verge's headline sets a terrific tiny tablet against a big price, and Wired's asks who a dream device is for.
- Emphasis
- The Verge stresses ruggedness and use in the field. Wired stresses the display, the 12GB of memory and local AI tests.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither review gives a long-term battery or durability test. The Verge says little about the memory increase, and Wired says little about the front camera's effect on use in portrait.
- Charged language
- “terrific tiny tablet”“A dream device”“massive glow-up”
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The 2026 iPad Mini has an 8.5-inch OLED display without a 120Hz refresh rate.
- It is rated IP67 and has no speaker holes, using an Acoustic Display instead.
- It uses the A20 Pro chip, with the best-configured version tested by both reviewers.
- It has no Face ID, only Touch ID.
- The starting price is $699, which both reviewers see as a drawback.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the nano-texture display option is worth $100 more
- Left
- Wired says it is totally worth it and gives a paperlike crispness. The Verge says it dulls the screen slightly and advises readers not to spend the money.
-
How much the missing 120Hz hurts
- Left
- The Verge says it is not an immediate dealbreaker but that you feel the difference. Wired mentions the missing 120Hz as a limit without calling it a serious flaw.
Apple organisation
Apple, as the reviewers relay it, argues that 120Hz is irrelevant because OLED's faster pixel response solves the problems. It made the Mini more durable and more capable. The reviewers say Apple pitches it for field and creator uses, but they are critical of the price.
““120Hz is irrelevant, OLED’s faster pixel response solves the problems.”” — The Verge
“Most of the demos Apple has been using to show off with the iPad Mini were more creator-focused than I expected.” — Wired
Left2 articles
-
WiredLC ·
Apple iPad Mini (2026) Review: A Dream Device, but Who Is It For?
Mixed An enthusiastic hardware review that praises the upgrades and asks whether the higher price fits the Mini's audience.

-
The VergeLC · · Opinion
The 2026 iPad Mini is a terrific tiny tablet — for a big price
Mixed A first-person opinion review that loves the hardware but says the price makes it hard to recommend, with an emphasis on durability and use in the field.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 3 Nov 14:00 First The VergeLC The 2026 iPad Mini is a terrific tiny tablet — for a big price Opinion
- 3 Nov 14:00 First WiredLC Apple iPad Mini (2026) Review: A Dream Device, but Who Is It For?
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…