Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Royal College of Nursing drops Teva UK as commercial partner after campaign pressure

The Royal College of Nursing has ended its commercial partnership with Teva UK, the British arm of the Israeli drugmaker, after pressure from pro-Palestine groups. The RCN cited due diligence on Teva's legal sanctions; Teva said it was disappointed and that healthcare had been politicised.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: Arab News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN), the UK nursing union, has ended its commercial partnership with Teva UK, the British arm of the Israeli drugmaker Teva Pharmaceuticals. Teva UK will no longer sponsor the RCNi nursing leadership summit on migraine and headache services on 30 October 2026, which will go ahead as planned. Carmel O’Boyle, chair of the RCN's ruling council, confirmed the decision in a letter to the campaign group Nurses for Palestine.

She said further due diligence showed that a number of Teva Pharmaceuticals’ operations, which have been the subject of legal sanction and public scrutiny, are not in line with the values of RCNi, the union's publishing and education arm, and of the RCN. The Guardian's headline summary and Arab News, which relayed the Guardian's report, say the move was over Teva's links to Israel's military and its corporate misconduct record; the quoted RCN letter itself refers only to legal sanctions and public scrutiny and does not mention Israel. The RCN acted after pressure from Nurses for Palestine and UK Healthcare Petitions to Royal Colleges (UKHPRC). The RCN represents more than 500,000 nurses, and Teva is one of the biggest suppliers of medicines to the NHS.

The campaigners called the decision “a major breakthrough for grassroots healthcare organising and the international boycott, divestment and sanctions movement”. A Nurses for Palestine spokesperson said Teva has no place sponsoring professional bodies dedicated to healing, care and preserving human life. UKHPRC said it was unthinkable that healthcare organisations continue commercial relationships with companies linked to state systems accused or found by international bodies to involve grave violations of international law, including crimes against humanity, apartheid and genocide. Teva said it was disappointed, that it valued its longstanding partnership with the RCN, that it is seeking further dialogue, and that healthcare is at its best when focused on patients rather than politicised.

Teva's record includes a €462.6m European Commission fine in 2024 for blocking rivals to its multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone in seven European countries, a $225m US Department of Justice settlement in 2023 over price-fixing of three drugs, and a $519m settlement in 2016 over bribery in Russia, Ukraine and Mexico. The Guardian puts total fines and payments over the last decade at about £1bn, while Arab News gives about $1.3 billion. Campaigners are now urging the Royal College of Pharmacy to drop Teva UK as a sponsor of its annual conference next month and cancel the company's exhibition presence.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Guardian reports the decision as a news item on a union dropping a sponsor, giving the RCN letter, campaigner statements and Teva's response, and detailing Teva's fines.
Emphasis
Campaigners' pressure, the RCN's due-diligence rationale, Teva's regulatory penalties and Teva's reply.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote the RCN on any Israel-related reason; the stated rationale is legal sanction and public scrutiny.
For example
“Britain’s nursing union axes Teva UK as commercial partner over links to Israel’s military and corporate track record” — The Guardian
“Teva said it was “disappointed” at the RCN’s decision and that healthcare had been “politicised.”” — The Guardian

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Arab News rewrites the Guardian report for a Middle East audience, leading with the Israel Defense Forces link and the campaigners' boycott framing.
Emphasis
Links to the IDF, the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, and Teva's fines converted into dollars.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits Teva's response, including its disappointment and its claim that healthcare was being politicised.
Charged language
“axed ties”“record of corporate misconduct”
For example
“The UK’s nursing union has axed ties with an Israeli pharmaceuticals firm over its links to the Israel Defense Forces and record of corporate misconduct, The Guardian reported on Friday.” — Arab News