Skip to content
Bramble

Crime

Russell Brand trial: former assistant's statement read to jury as prosecution case nears end

In the third week of Russell Brand's rape and sexual assault trial at Southwark Crown Court, a former personal assistant's witness statement describing his behaviour in the 2000s was read to the jury. The prosecution case is nearly finished and the defence is due to begin on Tuesday.

2 outlets · 0L · 2C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Deadline
Image: Evening Standard

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Centre · 2A witness statement from Russell Brand's former personal assistant was read to the jury at Southwark Crown Court on Monday 26 October, in the third week of his trial for rape and sexual assault. Centre · 2Brand faces three charges of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one of indecent assault, based on allegations made by six women; he denies all charges and has pleaded not guilty. Centre · 1The Evening Standard names the assistant as Helen Berger, who worked with Brand from June 2006 to February 2007 through his agent, John Noel, and often went to his flat in Camden, north London.

Centre · 2In the statement she said Brand had an "insane sexual appetite", was like a "peacock" whom women approached, and "never seemed happy after sex, more so depressed". Centre · 2She said she had worked with celebrities before and seen people normalising bad behaviour, but that this was "on another level", and that the normalising of Brand's behaviour made her think "this is just the way it is here". Centre · 1The Evening Standard reports she said she saw Brand "treat women poorly", that he used MySpace to find women, and that she once refused to keep getting female fans' phone numbers for him after feeling uncomfortable.

Centre · 1Deadline reports she also said she never witnessed Brand doing anything against the law, and that nobody disclosed anything like that to her. Centre · 2She said she left after about nine months because she was "sick of him and feeling burned out". Centre · 1Deadline adds that earlier statements read to the jury came from people linked to three of the accusers, including a Channel 4 colleague of one complainant, who described being told Brand's associates "watched and laughed" during an alleged assault in 2009, and a sister of another alleged victim.

Centre · 2Mr Justice Bennathan told jurors the prosecution case has nearly finished and the defence case will begin on Tuesday lunchtime; Deadline says Brand is expected to give evidence.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets report the assistant's statement as the latest prosecution evidence, leading on her description of Brand's sexual behaviour and mood; Deadline's headline quotes "Never Seemed Happy After Sex", the Standard's quotes that he "treated women poorly".
Emphasis
Deadline places the statement within wider trial evidence from witnesses linked to accusers and notes her remark that she never saw anything illegal; the Standard gives more detail on her job, dates and anecdotes (Sadie Frost interview, MySpace).
Leaves out or plays down
The Standard does not mention her statement that she never witnessed anything unlawful or the earlier witness statements; Deadline omits her name, dates of employment and the 'treated women poorly' remark.
Charged language
“insane sexual appetite”“peacock”“normalising bad behaviour”
For example
“Deadline has been reporting daily from a live video feed of the courtroom since the trial began.” — Deadline
“Ms Berger said Brand once conducted an interview with actress Sadie Frost while dressed only in his pants and an open robe.” — Evening Standard

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…