Saudi alert system silent before deadly Riyadh airport attacks, Reuters reports
Saudi Arabia issued no public warnings before a series of Houthi strikes on Riyadh airport last week, and has not said why. Officials and analysts told Reuters the silence raises questions about vulnerability and reflects an effort to maintain normalcy.
1 / 1
The story, neutrally told
Right · 1Saudi Arabia stopped issuing public warnings of imminent military attacks days before a series of strikes on Riyadh airport that, according to Reuters, killed at least 18 people and wounded more than 300. The Straits TimesRC “Saudi Arabia stopped issuing public warnings of imminent military attacks days before a series of deadly strikes on Riyadh airport that killed at least 18 people and wounded more than 300.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Centre · 1Hindustan Times, citing Reuters, describes Houthi attacks on the airport including one strike that killed at least 13 people, among them an Indian, and injured over 300. Hindustan TimesN “including a strike that killed at least 13 people, including an Indian, and injured over 300 others” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2The government has not said why there were no alerts before the four Riyadh attacks of the past week, and the civil defence authority and the government media office did not respond to Reuters' questions. The Straits TimesRC “The government has not said why there were no alerts to the public before the four Riyadh attacks in the past week.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Hindustan TimesN “The government has, however, not been able to answer why there were no alerts in place.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Right · 1Saudi Arabia began sending threat alerts to mobile phones and social media accounts through a national early warning system in May. The last alert before the attacks was on Sept 29, for Najran province, according to the civil defence X account; the authority issued its first alerts since then on Oct 12, warning of potential threats in Riyadh and southern cities. The Straits TimesRC “The last alert before last week’s attacks was issued on Sept 29, for the southern province of Najran, according to posts on the civil defence X account.”“On Oct 12, Saudi Arabia’s civil defence authority issued its first alerts since Sept 29, warning of potential threats in Riyadh and southern cities.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Reuters could not establish whether the Oct 12 alerts were a response to the airport attacks. The Straits TimesRC “Reuters was unable to ascertain whether the decision to issue alerts again was a response to the airport attacks” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Four Western and Arab officials and political analysts told Reuters the absence of warnings raised questions about the kingdom's vulnerability and ability to protect residents and visitors, and reflected efforts to maintain a sense of normalcy during its war with Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis. The Straits TimesRC “Their absence during the airport strikes raised questions about Saudi Arabia’s vulnerability to attack and about its ability to protect residents and visitors”“It also reflected efforts to maintain a sense of normalcy, they said.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 1Sultan Alamer of the Middle East Policy Council said the government wants "to have it both ways: to launch a military operation and at the same time try to give confidence to the population and external stakeholders". Former US ambassador Michael Ratney said the lack of alerts "creates the very nervousness they are trying to avoid". The Straits TimesRC ““They (the Saudi government) want to have it both ways: to launch a military operation and at the same time try to give confidence to the population and external stakeholders,””““But the lack of alerts of incoming Houthi attacks creates the very nervousness they are trying to avoid.”” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Two officials said an allied Western government asked Saudi authorities before the attacks why alerts had stopped, and were told they were too disruptive and many citizens complained of being woken at night. Saudi officials did not respond to requests for comment on that assertion. The Straits TimesRC “The response was that the alerts were too disruptive and many citizens had complained they were being woken by them at night, the officials said.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2Ali Shihabi, a Saudi analyst close to the government, said that with or without warnings the kingdom would struggle to defend all its assets given its size and a shortage of Patriots and interceptors. The Straits TimesRC “There is just not enough coverage to defend everything at once, not enough Patriots (missile defence systems), interceptors and missile batteries to do it all,”” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Hindustan TimesN “because of its size, the kingdom will find it hard to protect itself with or without early warnings” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Right · 1Western embassies have been sending their own internal missile and drone alerts to staff, but according to people familiar with the matter even the embassies received no warning before the Oct 10 airport strike, the deadliest of the attacks; Reuters could not determine why. The Straits TimesRC “They said that even the embassies had received no internal warning before the Oct 10 airport strike, without offering an explanation.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Other Gulf states have handled warnings differently since the US-Iran war began in February: Qatar has sent phone alerts before nearly every attack, while Bahrain and Kuwait have repeatedly sounded sirens. The Straits TimesRC “Qatar’s interior ministry has issued mobile phone alerts before nearly every attack”“Bahrain and Kuwait have repeatedly sounded sirens urging people to take shelter.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2Saudi Arabia hosted the World Petroleum Council Energy Congress in Riyadh on Monday, where Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said "this country is safe" but that the gathering "does not mean the risk is gone"; major oil bosses dropped out. US President Donald Trump said the Houthis were "misbehaving very badly". The Straits TimesRC “Despite the attacks, Saudi Arabia hosted an international conference on Monday, though major oil bosses dropped out.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Hindustan TimesN ““The Houthis are misbehaving very badly. No good,”” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Short rewrite of the Reuters report, framed as the alert system 'under scrutiny', adding an Indian victim, Indian embassy advice and Trump's comments.
- Emphasis
- Absence of warning, Indian angle, Trump's criticism of the Houthis.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the Western officials' account of why alerts stopped, the embassy alerts and the Gulf comparison.
- Charged language
- “misbehaving very badly”
- For example
-
“Saudi Arabia reportedly did not alert its public with warning ahead of the repeated fatal strikes in Riyadh over the last week.” — Hindustan Times
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Carries Reuters' investigative piece on why Saudi alerts went silent, weighing official silence against analysts' and officials' accounts.
- Emphasis
- Alert gaps, Western officials' account of 'too disruptive' alerts, embassy warnings, comparison with other Gulf states.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No Saudi government explanation available.
- For example
-
“The government has not said why there were no alerts to the public before the four Riyadh attacks in the past week.” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- Saudi Arabia issued no public alerts before the Riyadh airport strikes of the past week.
- The previous alert was on Sept 29 and alerts resumed on Oct 12.
- The alert system began in May and is run by the civil defence authority under the interior ministry.
- The government has not explained the absence of alerts.
- Houthi attacks injured over 300 people.
Where accounts differ
-
Death toll
- Centre
- Hindustan Times says one strike killed at least 13 people, including an Indian.
- Right
- Reuters copy in the Straits Times says the airport strikes killed at least 18 people.
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
No warning, deadly attack: Saudi Arabia's alert system under scrutiny after Riyadh strikes
Neutral Condensed secondhand account of Reuters' findings, with added Indian and US angles.
Right1 article
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Reuters
Saudi warning system stayed silent before deadly airport attacks
Critical Reuters copy examining why Saudi Arabia's public alerts stopped and what it says about vulnerability and image management.
- 13 Oct 00:40 First The Straits TimesRC Saudi warning system stayed silent before deadly airport attacks via Reuters
- 13 Oct 04:43 +4h 3m Hindustan TimesN No warning, deadly attack: Saudi Arabia's alert system under scrutiny after Riyadh strikes
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…