Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Senate Democrats block Ratepayer Protection Act on data center costs, 57-43

On 30 September the Senate fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance the House-passed Ratepayer Protection Act, which aims to keep data center costs off household bills. Democrats called it toothless; Republicans called it obstruction.

10 outlets · 5L · 2C · 3R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 4). New coverage since the last version from Al Jazeera, CBS News, NBC News, New York Post, Raw Story, The Guardian, Washington Examiner. Previously: “Senator blocks fast-track Senate vote on House-passed data center ratepayer bill”.

Image: Newsweek
Image: NBC News
Image: Hot Air
Image: The Guardian
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: CBS News
Image: New York Post
Image: Raw Story

1 / 8

The story, neutrally told

Senate Democrats on Wednesday 30 September blocked the Ratepayer Protection Act, which is meant to shield consumers from higher electricity costs tied to data centers. The vote fell short of the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster. The House had passed the bill 417-3 earlier in September.

It would set a federal standard on the issue for states to consider, covering large users of 100 megawatts or more, and it lets states refuse the standard. Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio) led the bill in the Senate and is in a tight re-election race against Democrat Sherrod Brown, who attacks him over data centers. Earlier, Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) had objected to passing it by unanimous consent, saying Congress needs legislation with "real teeth".

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called the bill "a fraud" and "optional" for states, and urged votes on bills by Sens. Van Hollen and Heinrich. Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) rejected the idea that it was a political move, noting near-unanimous House support, including from Democrats such as Hakeem Jeffries. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who is retiring, said Husted was right to get the message out but, asked whether the bill would achieve more, said "No."

The Guardian says the vote was one of the Senate's last before the 3 November midterms, with the chamber due to finish its work Friday.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left5 outlets

Framing
Straight news on the failed vote, giving Democrats' reasoning (toothless, optional) alongside Republican rebuttals and the electoral stakes for Husted.
Emphasis
The 57-43 tally, Democrats' objections and midterm politics; the Guardian notes the vote posed a quandary for Democrats.
Leaves out or plays down
Little on the bill's detailed provisions beyond a summary.
Charged language
“toothless”“a fraud”
For example
“Republicans are offering a toothless messaging bill.” — NBC News
“it also presented a quandary for the chamber’s Democrats” — The Guardian

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Explanatory coverage of what the bill does, its bipartisan House support, and criticism that it does not go far enough, written before the final vote.
Emphasis
Bill mechanics, Heinrich's alternative GRID Savings Act, and data center impacts on prices.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report the 30 September vote result.
For example
“Critics argue that the bill trying to protect households from higher utility bills doesn’t go far enough.” — Newsweek
“it’s not clear if the bill would have any impact” — The Hill

Right3 outlets

Framing
Opinion piece accusing Democrats of hypocrisy: campaigning against data centers while obstructing a bipartisan bill.
Emphasis
Democratic campaign messaging on data centers and Schumer's 'fraud' remark.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give Democrats' substantive objections beyond Schumer's label; predates the final vote.
Charged language
“weaselly, turncoat”“Democrats are standing in the way of lower prices”
For example
“This is another instance of Democrats talking out of one side of their mouths while doing the exact opposite.” — Hot Air